Sence
Sence Fan Index
College Football
2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence

Age-based abuse across college football fanbases

Age tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.

Compare two teamsWhat is Sence?

This board is published without a winner on purpose. No fanbase is named a leader on any single axis of abuse, so the figures below are listed alphabetically rather than ranked. Only the combined harm and identity-based abuse figure is ranked, on the toxicity leaderboard.

AllSECBig TenACCBig 12AmericanC-USAMACMountain WestPac-12Sun BeltIndependentFCS
Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuseRaceGenderLGBTQIA+AgeDisabilityPhysical Appearance
Team
Age / 1k
–
Alabama
SEC · 11–4
0.7
–
Arizona State
Big 12 · 8–5
1.2
–
Arkansas
SEC · 2–10
1.9
–
Auburn
SEC · 5–7
0.8
–
BYU
Big 12 · 12–2
0.9
–
Clemson
ACC · 7–6
1.1
–
Florida
SEC · 4–8
0.6
–
Florida State
ACC · 5–7
1
–
Georgia
SEC · 12–2
0.5
–
Georgia Tech
ACC · 9–4
0.4
–
Indiana
Big Ten · 16–0
0.6
–
Iowa
Big Ten · 9–4
1.7
–
Kansas State
Big 12 · 6–6
1.1
–
Kentucky
SEC · 5–7
0.9
–
LSU
SEC · 7–6
0.8
–
Miami
ACC · 13–3
0.8
–
Michigan
Big Ten · 9–4
1.9
–
Michigan State
Big Ten · 4–8
1.1
–
Minnesota
Big Ten · 8–5
1.6
–
Mississippi State
SEC · 5–8
1.1
–
Missouri
SEC · 8–5
1
–
Nebraska
Big Ten · 7–6
1.6
–
North Carolina
ACC · 4–8
6.1
–
Notre Dame
Independent · 10–2
0.7
–
Ohio State
Big Ten · 12–2
1
–
Oklahoma
SEC · 10–3
1.5
–
Oklahoma State
Big 12 · 1–11
1.8
–
Ole Miss
SEC · 13–2
0.5
–
Oregon
Big Ten · 13–2
0.7
–
Penn State
Big Ten · 7–6
0.6
–
Pittsburgh
ACC · 8–5
0.6
–
South Carolina
SEC · 4–8
1.2
–
Tennessee
SEC · 8–5
0.6
–
Texas
SEC · 10–3
0.8
–
Texas A&M
SEC · 11–2
0.7
–
Texas Tech
Big 12 · 12–2
0.3
–
UCLA
Big Ten · 3–9
0.9
–
USC
Big Ten · 9–4
1.5
–
Utah
Big 12 · 11–2
1
–
Vanderbilt
SEC · 10–3
2.6
–
Virginia Tech
ACC · 3–9
0.9
–
West Virginia
Big 12 · 4–8
0.7
–
Wisconsin
Big Ten · 4–8
1
Below volume threshold: too few comments to rate on Identity-based abuse: Age per 1,000
–
Boise State
Mountain West · 9–5
0.4
–
Iowa State
Big 12 · 8–4
0.5
–
Houston
Big 12 · 10–3
0.6
–
James Madison
Sun Belt · 12–2
0.5
–
South Florida
American · 9–4
0.5
–
Illinois
Big Ten · 9–4
0.6
–
Tulane
American · 11–3
0.4
–
Duke
ACC · 9–5
0.2
–
Virginia
ACC · 11–3
0.1
–
Arizona
Big 12 · 9–4
0.4
–
Hawaii
Mountain West · 9–4
0.3
–
Colorado
Big 12 · 3–9
0.5
–
Cincinnati
Big 12 · 7–6
0.6
–
Louisville
ACC · 9–4
0.2
–
Memphis
American · 8–5
0.6
–
Army
American · 7–6
0.2
–
TCU
Big 12 · 9–4
0.1
–
Maryland
Big Ten · 4–8
0.9
–
North Texas
American · 12–2
0.2
–
Syracuse
ACC · 3–9
1.5
–
Baylor
Big 12 · 5–7
0.2
–
New Mexico
Mountain West · 9–4
0.1
–
Washington
Big Ten · 9–4
0.9
–
Kansas
Big 12 · 5–7
1.4
–
Wyoming
Mountain West · 4–8
0.3
–
SMU
ACC · 9–4
0.3
–
Marshall
Sun Belt · 5–7
0.7
–
Appalachian State
Sun Belt · 5–8
0.1
–
Washington State
Pac-12 · 7–6
0.9
–
Southern Miss
Sun Belt · 7–6
0
–
UNLV
Mountain West · 10–4
0.5
–
East Carolina
American · 9–4
0.6
–
Purdue
Big Ten · 2–10
1
–
Ohio
MAC · 9–4
0.2
–
UCF
Big 12 · 5–7
0.2
–
Rutgers
Big Ten · 5–7
0.2
–
Oregon State
Pac-12 · 2–10
0.2
–
Troy
Sun Belt · 8–6
0.2
–
Delaware
C-USA · 7–6
1.1
–
Navy
American · 11–2
0
–
UTEP
C-USA · 2–10
0.4
–
NC State
ACC · 8–5
0.4
–
Louisiana Tech
C-USA · 8–5
0.2
–
Liberty
C-USA · 4–8
0
–
Wake Forest
ACC · 9–4
0.2
–
Western Michigan
MAC · 10–4
0
–
Colorado State
Mountain West · 2–10
0.7
–
Georgia Southern
Sun Belt · 7–6
0.9
–
Coastal Carolina
Sun Belt · 6–7
0
–
UConn
Independent · 9–4
0.7
–
Kennesaw State
C-USA · 10–4
0
–
Louisiana
Sun Belt · 6–7
0
–
North Dakota State
FCS · 12–1
0.2
–
Toledo
MAC · 8–5
0.5
–
Central Michigan
MAC · 7–6
0.5
–
Stanford
ACC · 4–8
0.3
–
San Diego State
Mountain West · 9–4
1.3
–
Bowling Green
MAC · 4–8
0.3
–
UTSA
American · 7–6
0.3
–
Boston College
ACC · 2–10
0.9
–
Arkansas State
Sun Belt · 7–6
0.3
–
Fresno State
Mountain West · 9–4
0
–
UAB
American · 4–8
0.9
–
Middle Tennessee
C-USA · 3–9
0.7
–
Air Force
Mountain West · 4–8
1
–
WKU
C-USA · 9–4
0
–
Tulsa
American · 4–8
0
–
Utah State
Mountain West · 6–7
0.4
–
Sam Houston
C-USA · 2–10
0
–
Texas State
Sun Belt · 7–6
0
–
Missouri State
C-USA · 7–6
0.5
–
Temple
American · 5–7
0.5
–
Old Dominion
Sun Belt · 10–3
0
–
Northwestern
Big Ten · 7–6
0
–
FIU
C-USA · 7–6
0
–
New Mexico State
C-USA · 4–8
0
–
San Jose State
Mountain West · 3–9
0
–
South Alabama
Sun Belt · 4–8
0
–
UMass
MAC · 0–12
0
–
Charlotte
American · 1–11
0
–
Rice
American · 5–8
0
–
Florida Atlantic
American · 4–8
0
–
Nevada
Mountain West · 3–9
0.9
–
Miami (Ohio)
MAC · 7–7
0
–
Northern Illinois
MAC · 3–9
0
–
Akron
MAC · 5–7
0
–
UL Monroe
Sun Belt · 3–9
1.1
–
Ball State
MAC · 4–8
0
–
Kent State
MAC · 5–7
0
–
Sacramento State
FCS · 7–5
0
–
California
ACC · 7–6
0
–
Jacksonville State
C-USA · 9–5
0
–
Buffalo
MAC · 5–7
0
–
Georgia State
Sun Belt · 1–11
0
–
Eastern Michigan
MAC · 4–8
0

Identity-based abuse: Age per 1,000 is published for 43 of 138 fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.

Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.

See Sence on your communityAbout the data