UCF

Knights · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
656.2
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
5,718
2025–26 season
Positive share
65.6%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
25.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UCF fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 84th percentile · College Sports: 72nd percentile · Team & Front Office: 34th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UCF Harm: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCF Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UCF Explicit Language: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCF College Sports: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCF Off-Field Storylines: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCF Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UCF Team & Front Office: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive65.6%3,752
Neutral8.3%474
Negative24.3%1,390
Mixed1.8%102

Signature subtags

What UCF fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
2×

Mentioned Injuries at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

12.6 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.7×

Mentioned Recruiting at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8.2 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.6×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

18.7 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +89% · W 34–9 vs North CarolinaLow: −18% · L 20–27 vs KansasAug 28: W 17–10 vs Jacksonville StateWSep 6: W 68–7 vs NC A&TWSep 20: W 34–9 vs North CarolinaWSep 27: L 20–34 at Kansas StateLOct 4: L 20–27 vs KansasLOct 11: L 11–20 at CincinnatiLOct 18: W 45–13 vs West VirginiaWNov 1: L 3–30 at BaylorLNov 7: L 27–30 vs HoustonLNov 15: L 9–48 at Texas TechLNov 22: W 17–14 vs Oklahoma StateWNov 29: L 21–41 at BYULAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+33%334148569W 17–10 vs Jacksonville State
2025-08-30+28%401974No game
2025-09-06+64%56096726W 68–7 vs NC A&T
2025-09-13+68%10010133No game
2025-09-20+89%67622737W 34–9 vs North Carolina
2025-09-27+32%259121429L 20–34 at Kansas State
2025-10-04−18%200302565L 20–27 vs Kansas
2025-10-11+12%8362170L 11–20 at Cincinnati
2025-10-18+81%1167134W 45–13 vs West Virginia
2025-10-25+86%1437159No game
2025-11-01−15%147206384L 3–30 at Baylor; L 27–30 vs Houston
2025-11-08−1%6769152No game
2025-11-15+8%120100244L 9–48 at Texas Tech
2025-11-22+54%20647292W 17–14 vs Oklahoma State
2025-11-29+51%17853246L 21–41 at BYU
2025-12-06+8%131126No game
2025-12-13+57%561375No game
2025-12-20+73%8410102No game
2025-12-27+43%24935No game
2026-01-03+66%16026204No game
2026-01-10+54%671989No game
2026-01-17+50%11933173No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 7 to Kansas, gaining 104 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%46%92%Aug 28: W 17–10 vs Jacksonville StateWSep 6: W 68–7 vs NC A&TWSep 20: W 34–9 vs North CarolinaWSep 27: L 20–34 at Kansas StateLOct 4: L 20–27 vs KansasLOct 11: L 11–20 at CincinnatiLOct 18: W 45–13 vs West VirginiaWNov 1: L 3–30 at BaylorLNov 7: L 27–30 vs HoustonLNov 15: L 9–48 at Texas TechLNov 22: W 17–14 vs Oklahoma StateWNov 29: L 21–41 at BYULAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2358.7%26%569
2025-08-3054.1%25.7%74
2025-09-0677.1%13.2%726
2025-09-1375.2%7.5%133
2025-09-2091.7%3%737
2025-09-2760.4%28.2%429
2025-10-0435.4%53.5%565
2025-10-1148.8%36.5%170
2025-10-1886.6%5.2%134
2025-10-2589.9%4.4%159
2025-11-0138.3%53.6%384
2025-11-0844.1%45.4%152
2025-11-1549.2%41%244
2025-11-2270.5%16.1%292
2025-11-2972.4%21.5%246
2025-12-0650%42.3%26
2025-12-1374.7%17.3%75
2025-12-2082.4%9.8%102
2025-12-2768.6%25.7%35
2026-01-0378.4%12.7%204
2026-01-1075.3%21.3%89
2026-01-1768.8%19.1%173

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm22.6 per 1,000 · 129
Personal Attacks 123Sexual Content 2Group Hate 3Harm Wish 2
Identity-Based Abuse3.3 per 1,000 · 19
Gender 5Disability 2Physical Appearance 9LGBTQIA+ 2Age 1Race 1
Explicit Language14.5 per 1,000 · 83
Explicit Words 66Explicit Acronym 17Violent Language 3
College Sports21.7 per 1,000 · 124
Transfer Portal 31Band 9Recruiting 47Conference Realignment 11NIL 22Student Section 13
Off-Field Storylines38.6 per 1,000 · 221
Broadcast & Media 107Injuries 72Officiating 38Player Conduct 5
Sports Betting1.9 per 1,000 · 11
Gambling 8Prop Bet 2Parlay 1
Team & Front Office109.7 per 1,000 · 627
Coaching 373Opponent Hostility 96Front Office 16Crowd & Attendance 62Stadium Experience 43Opponent Respect 47Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

39th percentile
83 explicit comments14.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words66
  • Explicit Acronym17
  • Violent Language3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 14.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 62nd of 100 nationally, the 39th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 25.967.4 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 10)WWWLLLWLLLWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2342.2W 17–10 vs Jacksonville State
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-0615.2W 68–7 vs NC A&T
2025-09-137.5No game
2025-09-204.1W 34–9 vs North Carolina
2025-09-2735L 20–34 at Kansas State
2025-10-0431.9L 20–27 vs Kansas
2025-10-1141.2L 11–20 at Cincinnati
2025-10-180W 45–13 vs West Virginia
2025-10-2525.2No game
2025-11-0146.9L 3–30 at Baylor; L 27–30 vs Houston
2025-11-0859.2No game
2025-11-1536.9L 9–48 at Texas Tech
2025-11-220W 17–14 vs Oklahoma State
2025-11-2948.8L 21–41 at BYU
2025-12-0638.5No game
2025-12-1313.3No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0319.6No game
2026-01-1067.4No game
2026-01-1728.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 67.4 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 10)) against a season average of 25.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks123
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish2
  • Sexual Content2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance9
  • Gender5
  • Disability2
  • LGBTQIA+2
  • Age1
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Win or lose, it would be nice if the football team went over and applauded the marching band for their amazing support at the end of every game. Start a tradition. 🖤 Go Knights 💛

positiveBandFacebook

Can't wait to cheer on our team 🐥 Let's Go Man!!!!

positiveFacebook

Kinda weak compared to previous years

negativeFacebook

Gus left the program in a shambles with nothing to build from. I'll give Frost a fair amount of time.

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.