San Diego State

Aztecs · 9–4 in 2025–26

Compare San Diego State with…
Fan Score
545.5
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
3,850
2025–26 season
Positive share
54.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
33.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects San Diego State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 79th percentile · Explicit Language: 64th percentile · College Sports: 61st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • San Diego State Harm: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • San Diego State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • San Diego State Explicit Language: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • San Diego State College Sports: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • San Diego State Off-Field Storylines: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • San Diego State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • San Diego State Team & Front Office: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive54.5%2,100
Neutral9.5%366
Negative33.5%1,291
Mixed2.4%93

Signature subtags

What San Diego State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
5.6×

Mentioned Student Section at 5.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
5×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

24.4 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
4.9×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 4.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

48.1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +90% · week of Oct 18Low: −37% · L 6–38 at HawaiiAug 28: W 42–0 vs Stony BrookWSep 6: L 13–36 at Washington StateLSep 20: W 34–0 vs CaliforniaWSep 27: W 6–3 at Northern IllinoisWOct 3: W 45–24 vs Colorado StateWOct 11: W 44–10 at NevadaWOct 25: W 23–0 at Fresno StateWNov 1: W 24–7 vs WyomingWNov 8: L 6–38 at HawaiiLNov 15: W 17–7 vs Boise StateWNov 22: W 25–3 vs San Jose StateWNov 28: L 17–23 (2OT) at New MexicoLDec 27: L 47–49 vs North TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+16%10269201W 42–0 vs Stony Brook
2025-08-30+18%302055No game
2025-09-06−31%3573123L 13–36 at Washington State
2025-09-13+40%7310No game
2025-09-20+66%17328221W 34–0 vs California
2025-09-27+43%13147196W 6–3 at Northern Illinois; W 45–24 vs Colorado State
2025-10-04+32%12457210No game
2025-10-11+64%9615126W 44–10 at Nevada
2025-10-18+90%26029No game
2025-10-25+49%22870322W 23–0 at Fresno State
2025-11-01+32%18486309W 24–7 vs Wyoming
2025-11-08−37%128317509L 6–38 at Hawaii
2025-11-15+33%17177283W 17–7 vs Boise State
2025-11-22+39%21482338W 25–3 vs San Jose State; L 17–23 (2OT) at New Mexico
2025-11-29−28%108218390No game
2025-12-06+38%7329116No game
2025-12-13+60%8210No game
2025-12-20+84%59367No game
2025-12-27+27%16389272L 47–49 vs North Texas
2026-01-03+42%15231No game
2026-01-10+57%15321No game
2026-01-17+82%10111No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week of Nov 29, gaining 112 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%45%91%Aug 28: W 42–0 vs Stony BrookWSep 6: L 13–36 at Washington StateLSep 20: W 34–0 vs CaliforniaWSep 27: W 6–3 at Northern IllinoisWOct 3: W 45–24 vs Colorado StateWOct 11: W 44–10 at NevadaWOct 25: W 23–0 at Fresno StateWNov 1: W 24–7 vs WyomingWNov 8: L 6–38 at HawaiiLNov 15: W 17–7 vs Boise StateWNov 22: W 25–3 vs San Jose StateWNov 28: L 17–23 (2OT) at New MexicoLDec 27: L 47–49 vs North TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2350.7%34.3%201
2025-08-3054.5%36.4%55
2025-09-0628.5%59.3%123
2025-09-1370%30%10
2025-09-2078.3%12.7%221
2025-09-2766.8%24%196
2025-10-0459%27.1%210
2025-10-1176.2%11.9%126
2025-10-1889.7%0%29
2025-10-2570.8%21.7%322
2025-11-0159.5%27.8%309
2025-11-0825.1%62.3%509
2025-11-1560.4%27.2%283
2025-11-2263.3%24.3%338
2025-11-2927.7%55.9%390
2025-12-0662.9%25%116
2025-12-1380%20%10
2025-12-2088.1%4.5%67
2025-12-2759.9%32.7%272
2026-01-0348.4%6.5%31
2026-01-1071.4%14.3%21
2026-01-1790.9%9.1%11

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm27.3 per 1,000 · 105
Personal Attacks 95Sexual Content 4Group Hate 8Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse6 per 1,000 · 23
Age 5Gender 2Physical Appearance 3Disability 8Race 4LGBTQIA+ 2Religion 1
Explicit Language27.5 per 1,000 · 106
Explicit Words 83Explicit Acronym 19Violent Language 4Explicit Emoji 2
College Sports18.2 per 1,000 · 70
Student Section 15Conference Realignment 27Recruiting 14Band 6NIL 2Transfer Portal 6
Off-Field Storylines28.3 per 1,000 · 109
Injuries 24Broadcast & Media 51Politics & Activism 8Officiating 24Player Conduct 3
Sports Betting3.9 per 1,000 · 15
Gambling 13Moneyline 1Prop Bet 1
Team & Front Office168.1 per 1,000 · 647
Opponent Respect 53Crowd & Attendance 185Opponent Hostility 102Coaching 225Stadium Experience 94Athletic Department 5Front Office 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

64th percentile
106 explicit comments27.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words83
  • Explicit Acronym19
  • Violent Language4
  • Explicit Emoji2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 27.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 38th of 100 nationally, the 64th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 33.271.2 per 1,000 · W 24–7 vs WyomingWLWWWWWWLWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2324.9W 42–0 vs Stony Brook
2025-08-3018.2No game
2025-09-0656.9L 13–36 at Washington State
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-209W 34–0 vs California
2025-09-270W 6–3 at Northern Illinois; W 45–24 vs Colorado State
2025-10-0442.9No game
2025-10-117.9W 44–10 at Nevada
2025-10-180No game
2025-10-2543.5W 23–0 at Fresno State
2025-11-0171.2W 24–7 vs Wyoming
2025-11-0839.3L 6–38 at Hawaii
2025-11-1531.8W 17–7 vs Boise State
2025-11-2223.7W 25–3 vs San Jose State; L 17–23 (2OT) at New Mexico
2025-11-2935.9No game
2025-12-068.6No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-2014.9No game
2025-12-2751.5L 47–49 vs North Texas
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 71.2 per 1,000 comments (W 24–7 vs Wyoming) against a season average of 33.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks95
  • Group Hate8
  • Sexual Content4
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability8
  • Age5
  • Race4
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Gender2
  • LGBTQIA+2
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Now it's time to lead, and return to Aztec winning ways.

positiveFacebook

Finally an Aztec with a National Championship Ring. Welcome to the Mesa.

positiveFacebook

We got bitch slapped all night and didn’t respond

negativeExplicit WordsFacebook

…in spite of the high-priced tickets & resulting weak attendance. Fight on, and on, Ye Aztec Men. Because that is what you do! In spite of the nonsense. It’ll come around soon.

mixedCrowd & AttendanceFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.