Syracuse

Orange · 3–9 in 2025–26

Fan Score
386.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
9,364
2025–26 season
Positive share
38.7%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
57.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Syracuse fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 91st percentile · Harm: 90th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 86th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Syracuse Harm: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Identity-Based Abuse: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Explicit Language: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse College Sports: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Off-Field Storylines: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Team & Front Office: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive38.7%3,621
Neutral8.1%757
Negative50.9%4,764
Mixed2.4%222

Signature subtags

What Syracuse fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
2.8×

Mentioned Injuries at 2.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.4 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
2.5×

Mentioned Explicit Emoji at 2.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
2.4×

Mentioned Recruiting at 2.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

11.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +75% · week of Aug 23Low: −51% · L 7–70 at Notre DameAug 30: L 26–45 vs TennesseeLSep 6: W 27–20 (OT) vs UConnWSep 12: W 66–24 vs ColgateWSep 20: W 34–21 at ClemsonWSep 27: L 3–38 vs DukeLOct 4: L 18–31 at SMULOct 18: L 13–30 vs PittsburghLOct 25: L 16–41 at Georgia TechLOct 31: L 10–27 vs North CarolinaLNov 8: L 10–38 at MiamiLNov 22: L 7–70 at Notre DameLNov 29: L 12–34 vs Boston CollegeLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+75%14416170No game
2025-08-30−14%3955461,049L 26–45 vs Tennessee
2025-09-06−9%332411833W 27–20 (OT) vs UConn; W 66–24 vs Colgate
2025-09-13+29%244124416No game
2025-09-20+31%6263081,038W 34–21 at Clemson
2025-09-27−38%110266413L 3–38 vs Duke
2025-10-04−23%180303531L 18–31 at SMU
2025-10-11+30%7739125No game
2025-10-18−15%203285532L 13–30 vs Pittsburgh
2025-10-25−23%230378657L 16–41 at Georgia Tech; L 10–27 vs North Carolina
2025-11-01−33%151341576No game
2025-11-08−29%98191321L 10–38 at Miami
2025-11-15+13%10982212No game
2025-11-22−51%2348171,150L 7–70 at Notre Dame
2025-11-29−40%147372568L 12–34 vs Boston College
2025-12-06−2%139148380No game
2025-12-13−13%4056123No game
2025-12-20−6%151735No game
2025-12-27+60%415No game
2026-01-03+20%493285No game
2026-01-10+41%8631134No game
2026-01-17+73%8011No game
Fan mood fell 90 points the week they lost by 19 to Tennessee.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%42%85%Aug 30: L 26–45 vs TennesseeLSep 6: W 27–20 (OT) vs UConnWSep 12: W 66–24 vs ColgateWSep 20: W 34–21 at ClemsonWSep 27: L 3–38 vs DukeLOct 4: L 18–31 at SMULOct 18: L 13–30 vs PittsburghLOct 25: L 16–41 at Georgia TechLOct 31: L 10–27 vs North CarolinaLNov 8: L 10–38 at MiamiLNov 22: L 7–70 at Notre DameLNov 29: L 12–34 vs Boston CollegeLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2384.7%9.4%170
2025-08-3037.7%52%1,049
2025-09-0639.9%49.3%833
2025-09-1358.7%29.8%416
2025-09-2060.3%29.7%1,038
2025-09-2726.6%64.4%413
2025-10-0433.9%57.1%531
2025-10-1161.6%31.2%125
2025-10-1838.2%53.6%532
2025-10-2535%57.5%657
2025-11-0126.2%59.2%576
2025-11-0830.5%59.5%321
2025-11-1551.4%38.7%212
2025-11-2220.3%71%1,150
2025-11-2925.9%65.5%568
2025-12-0636.6%38.9%380
2025-12-1332.5%45.5%123
2025-12-2042.9%48.6%35
2025-12-2780%20%5
2026-01-0357.6%37.6%85
2026-01-1064.2%23.1%134
2026-01-1772.7%0%11

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments once this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm49.2 per 1,000 · 461
Group Hate 16Personal Attacks 444Sexual Content 6Harm Wish 2Violent Threat 3
Identity-Based Abuse8.7 per 1,000 · 81
Race 13Physical Appearance 16Age 14Gender 24Disability 18LGBTQIA+ 3
Explicit Language42.4 per 1,000 · 397
Explicit Acronym 60Explicit Words 323Explicit Emoji 19Violent Language 6Usual Suspects 1
College Sports25.5 per 1,000 · 239
NIL 53Student Section 12Transfer Portal 51Recruiting 106Conference Realignment 24Band 8
Off-Field Storylines39.1 per 1,000 · 366
Injuries 163Broadcast & Media 125Player Conduct 5Officiating 72Politics & Activism 4
Sports Betting4.7 per 1,000 · 44
Gambling 30Prop Bet 11Moneyline 3
Team & Front Office144.4 per 1,000 · 1,352
Coaching 1,034Opponent Hostility 126Crowd & Attendance 122Stadium Experience 29Opponent Respect 30Athletic Department 7Front Office 23

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

91st percentile
397 explicit comments42.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words323
  • Explicit Acronym60
  • Explicit Emoji19
  • Violent Language6
  • Usual Suspects1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 42.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 10th of 100 nationally, the 91st percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 57.9131.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)LWWWLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2317.6No game
2025-08-30105.8L 26–45 vs Tennessee
2025-09-0636W 27–20 (OT) vs UConn; W 66–24 vs Colgate
2025-09-1376.9No game
2025-09-2053W 34–21 at Clemson
2025-09-2755.7L 3–38 vs Duke
2025-10-0445.2L 18–31 at SMU
2025-10-1172No game
2025-10-1835.7L 13–30 vs Pittsburgh
2025-10-2550.2L 16–41 at Georgia Tech; L 10–27 vs North Carolina
2025-11-0148.6No game
2025-11-0862.3L 10–38 at Miami
2025-11-15113.2No game
2025-11-2220.9L 7–70 at Notre Dame
2025-11-2947.5L 12–34 vs Boston College
2025-12-06131.6No game
2025-12-1356.9No game
2025-12-2085.7No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-03129.4No game
2026-01-1067.2No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 131.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 57.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks444
  • Group Hate16
  • Sexual Content6
  • Violent Threat3
  • Harm Wish2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender24
  • Disability18
  • Physical Appearance16
  • Age14
  • Race13
  • LGBTQIA+3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

To go bowling, we’ll need to win at least two out of three versus Duke, Pitt and UNC and hopefully pick off SMU and/or Georgia Tech on the road. Best of luck to SU football in 2025.

positiveFacebook

Wish they had these when I was in high school.

positiveFacebook

Syracuse sucks. Giving up my season tickets and seriously considering not buying them again until we have a new coach that can actually get the job done with some fundamentals and football knowledge. Swag on Fran Brown.

negativeCoachingFacebook

Was planning on going till I broke my foot 2 weeks ago! So disappointed ☹️. Let’s Go Orange! 🍊 🏈

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.