Who they are
The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Maryland fans raise more than anyone else.
Comment-section fingerprint
- Maryland Harm: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Identity-Based Abuse: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Explicit Language: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland College Sports: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Team & Front Office: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
Sentiment
Signature subtags
What Maryland fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.
Mentioned Athletic Department at 4.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Mentioned Conference Realignment at 4.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Mentioned Transfer Portal at 3.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.
How the season felt
Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.
Season heartbeat
Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.
| Week of | Net mood | Positive | Negative | Comments | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | −3% | 83 | 89 | 196 | No game |
| 2025-08-30 | +21% | 296 | 179 | 557 | W 39–7 vs Florida Atlantic; W 20–9 vs Northern Illinois |
| 2025-09-06 | −30% | 106 | 221 | 387 | No game |
| 2025-09-13 | −7% | 219 | 255 | 540 | W 44–17 vs Towson |
| 2025-09-20 | +51% | 594 | 165 | 843 | W 27–10 at Wisconsin |
| 2025-09-27 | +58% | 157 | 31 | 219 | No game |
| 2025-10-04 | −42% | 162 | 424 | 623 | L 20–24 vs Washington |
| 2025-10-11 | −34% | 189 | 413 | 654 | L 31–34 vs Nebraska |
| 2025-10-18 | −53% | 124 | 469 | 653 | L 17–20 at UCLA |
| 2025-10-25 | −21% | 82 | 139 | 272 | No game |
| 2025-11-01 | −59% | 151 | 725 | 966 | L 10–55 vs Indiana |
| 2025-11-08 | −66% | 97 | 599 | 755 | L 20–35 at Rutgers |
| 2025-11-15 | −55% | 130 | 530 | 733 | L 6–24 at Illinois |
| 2025-11-22 | −45% | 131 | 410 | 616 | L 20–45 vs Michigan |
| 2025-11-29 | −49% | 157 | 542 | 782 | L 28–38 vs Michigan State |
| 2025-12-06 | −4% | 45 | 50 | 112 | No game |
| 2025-12-13 | +4% | 49 | 45 | 100 | No game |
| 2025-12-20 | +36% | 61 | 26 | 98 | No game |
| 2025-12-27 | +21% | 91 | 54 | 173 | No game |
| 2026-01-03 | +38% | 72 | 27 | 120 | No game |
| 2026-01-10 | +17% | 53 | 35 | 108 | No game |
| 2026-01-17 | +85% | 88 | 3 | 100 | No game |
Season trend
Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.
| Week of | Positive | Negative | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 42.3% | 45.4% | 196 |
| 2025-08-30 | 53.1% | 32.1% | 557 |
| 2025-09-06 | 27.4% | 57.1% | 387 |
| 2025-09-13 | 40.6% | 47.2% | 540 |
| 2025-09-20 | 70.5% | 19.6% | 843 |
| 2025-09-27 | 71.7% | 14.2% | 219 |
| 2025-10-04 | 26% | 68.1% | 623 |
| 2025-10-11 | 28.9% | 63.1% | 654 |
| 2025-10-18 | 19% | 71.8% | 653 |
| 2025-10-25 | 30.1% | 51.1% | 272 |
| 2025-11-01 | 15.6% | 75.1% | 966 |
| 2025-11-08 | 12.8% | 79.3% | 755 |
| 2025-11-15 | 17.7% | 72.3% | 733 |
| 2025-11-22 | 21.3% | 66.6% | 616 |
| 2025-11-29 | 20.1% | 69.3% | 782 |
| 2025-12-06 | 40.2% | 44.6% | 112 |
| 2025-12-13 | 49% | 45% | 100 |
| 2025-12-20 | 62.2% | 26.5% | 98 |
| 2025-12-27 | 52.6% | 31.2% | 173 |
| 2026-01-03 | 60% | 22.5% | 120 |
| 2026-01-10 | 49.1% | 32.4% | 108 |
| 2026-01-17 | 88% | 3% | 100 |
Season timeline
Won the game, lost the comments once this season; open a game below for that night’s story.
- Aug 30W 39–7vs Florida Atlantic
- Sep 5W 20–9vs Northern Illinois
- Sep 13W 44–17vs Towson
- Sep 20W 27–10at Wisconsin
- Oct 4L 20–24vs Washington
- Oct 11L 31–34vs Nebraska
- Oct 18L 17–20at UCLA
- Nov 1L 10–55vs Indiana
- Nov 8L 20–35at Rutgers
- Nov 15L 6–24at Illinois
- Nov 22L 20–45vs Michigan
- Nov 29L 28–38vs Michigan StateNeutral
What they actually said
The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.
Comment insights
Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.
Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.
The Swear Jar
- Explicit Words278
- Explicit Acronym57
- Explicit Emoji4
- Violent Language3
Tag applications, which may overlap.
Moderation snapshot
| Week of | Rate per 1,000 | Games |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 40.8 | No game |
| 2025-08-30 | 34.1 | W 39–7 vs Florida Atlantic; W 20–9 vs Northern Illinois |
| 2025-09-06 | 59.4 | No game |
| 2025-09-13 | 46.3 | W 44–17 vs Towson |
| 2025-09-20 | 35.6 | W 27–10 at Wisconsin |
| 2025-09-27 | 4.6 | No game |
| 2025-10-04 | 32.1 | L 20–24 vs Washington |
| 2025-10-11 | 53.5 | L 31–34 vs Nebraska |
| 2025-10-18 | 88.8 | L 17–20 at UCLA |
| 2025-10-25 | 102.9 | No game |
| 2025-11-01 | 55.9 | L 10–55 vs Indiana |
| 2025-11-08 | 34.4 | L 20–35 at Rutgers |
| 2025-11-15 | 65.5 | L 6–24 at Illinois |
| 2025-11-22 | 50.3 | L 20–45 vs Michigan |
| 2025-11-29 | 60.1 | L 28–38 vs Michigan State |
| 2025-12-06 | 53.6 | No game |
| 2025-12-13 | 50 | No game |
| 2025-12-20 | 51 | No game |
| 2025-12-27 | 11.6 | No game |
| 2026-01-03 | 100 | No game |
| 2026-01-10 | 0 | No game |
| 2026-01-17 | 0 | No game |
Season subtag split
Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.
- Personal Attacks367
- Group Hate13
- Sexual Content13
- Harm Wish4
- Physical Appearance29
- Gender27
- Race15
- Disability13
- Age9
- LGBTQIA+5
Tag applications, which may overlap.
Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.
From the comment section
“I remeber games when they had to add addional seats in the end zone because of demand.”
“KG is one in a million. He is a community legend and finds ways to help.”
“Typical Md. Game. Lose big to teams that are ranked and lose big to teams they should beat. I feel sorry for these players, apparently there is no leadership.”
“Time to Shock the college football world. Oh and all the negative Terps fans that post nothing but negative items.”