Florida State

Seminoles · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
390.8
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
20,908
2025–26 season
Positive share
39.1%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
57.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Florida State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 100th percentile · Harm: 88th percentile · Team & Front Office: 88th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Florida State Harm: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State Identity-Based Abuse: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State Explicit Language: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State College Sports: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State Off-Field Storylines: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State Sports Betting: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Florida State Team & Front Office: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive39.1%8,170
Neutral7.9%1,645
Negative51.5%10,759
Mixed1.6%334

Signature subtags

What Florida State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
5.8×

Mentioned Politics & Activism at 5.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.9 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
3.9×

Mentioned Student Section at 3.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.7 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
2.3×

Mentioned Race at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.4 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +46% · W 77–3 vs E Texas A&MLow: −58% · L 31–34 vs PittsburghAug 30: W 31–17 vs AlabamaWSep 6: W 77–3 vs E Texas A&MWSep 20: W 66–10 vs Kent StateWSep 26: L 38–46 (2OT) at VirginiaLOct 4: L 22–28 vs MiamiLOct 11: L 31–34 vs PittsburghLOct 18: L 13–20 at StanfordLNov 1: W 42–7 vs Wake ForestWNov 8: L 10–24 at ClemsonLNov 15: W 34–14 vs Virginia TechWNov 21: L 11–21 at NC StateLNov 29: L 21–40 at FloridaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23−4%229251579No game
2025-08-30+45%1,1063571,649W 31–17 vs Alabama
2025-09-06+46%465145694W 77–3 vs E Texas A&M
2025-09-13+15%192136374No game
2025-09-20+15%6474621,271W 66–10 vs Kent State; L 38–46 (2OT) at Virginia
2025-09-27−36%5891,3832,218No game
2025-10-04−11%7659731,896L 22–28 vs Miami
2025-10-11−58%3471,4711,934L 31–34 vs Pittsburgh
2025-10-18−57%2421,0321,384L 13–20 at Stanford
2025-10-25−39%70179282No game
2025-11-01+25%512289877W 42–7 vs Wake Forest
2025-11-08−36%3086801,042L 10–24 at Clemson
2025-11-15+26%466261801W 34–14 vs Virginia Tech; L 11–21 at NC State
2025-11-22−51%3191,0851,504No game
2025-11-29−30%4318461,373L 21–40 at Florida
2025-12-06+33%11554186No game
2025-12-13−45%93293441No game
2025-12-20−42%47135211No game
2025-12-27+33%554260895No game
2026-01-03+21%9560168No game
2026-01-10+12%373280753No game
2026-01-17+21%205127376No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 3 to Pittsburgh, gaining 84 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%38%76%Aug 30: W 31–17 vs AlabamaWSep 6: W 77–3 vs E Texas A&MWSep 20: W 66–10 vs Kent StateWSep 26: L 38–46 (2OT) at VirginiaLOct 4: L 22–28 vs MiamiLOct 11: L 31–34 vs PittsburghLOct 18: L 13–20 at StanfordLNov 1: W 42–7 vs Wake ForestWNov 8: L 10–24 at ClemsonLNov 15: W 34–14 vs Virginia TechWNov 21: L 11–21 at NC StateLNov 29: L 21–40 at FloridaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2339.6%43.4%579
2025-08-3067.1%21.6%1,649
2025-09-0667%20.9%694
2025-09-1351.3%36.4%374
2025-09-2050.9%36.3%1,271
2025-09-2726.6%62.4%2,218
2025-10-0440.3%51.3%1,896
2025-10-1117.9%76.1%1,934
2025-10-1817.5%74.6%1,384
2025-10-2524.8%63.5%282
2025-11-0158.4%33%877
2025-11-0829.6%65.3%1,042
2025-11-1558.2%32.6%801
2025-11-2221.2%72.1%1,504
2025-11-2931.4%61.6%1,373
2025-12-0661.8%29%186
2025-12-1321.1%66.4%441
2025-12-2022.3%64%211
2025-12-2761.9%29.1%895
2026-01-0356.5%35.7%168
2026-01-1049.5%37.2%753
2026-01-1754.5%33.8%376

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm48.1 per 1,000 · 1,005
Personal Attacks 937Sexual Content 23Violent Threat 3Group Hate 60Harm Wish 9
Identity-Based Abuse9.8 per 1,000 · 204
LGBTQIA+ 32Race 29Physical Appearance 40Age 21Disability 43Gender 42Religion 1
Explicit Language60.4 per 1,000 · 1,263
Explicit Words 1,061Explicit Acronym 191Explicit Emoji 33Violent Language 14
College Sports22.4 per 1,000 · 468
Recruiting 139NIL 97Transfer Portal 164Student Section 57Band 13Conference Realignment 27
Off-Field Storylines31 per 1,000 · 649
Broadcast & Media 245Injuries 156Officiating 178Politics & Activism 61Player Conduct 14
Sports Betting3.3 per 1,000 · 70
Gambling 61Prop Bet 3Parlay 3Moneyline 3
Team & Front Office189.7 per 1,000 · 3,967
Coaching 2,629Opponent Hostility 881Crowd & Attendance 202Opponent Respect 127Stadium Experience 109Front Office 112Athletic Department 11

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

100th percentile
1,263 explicit comments60.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words1,061
  • Explicit Acronym191
  • Explicit Emoji33
  • Violent Language14

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 60.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 1st of 100 nationally, the 100th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 57.8102.2 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)WWWLLLLWLWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2388.1No game
2025-08-3047.9W 31–17 vs Alabama
2025-09-0643.2W 77–3 vs E Texas A&M
2025-09-1377.5No game
2025-09-2051.9W 66–10 vs Kent State; L 38–46 (2OT) at Virginia
2025-09-2770.8No game
2025-10-0464.9L 22–28 vs Miami
2025-10-1160L 31–34 vs Pittsburgh
2025-10-1863.6L 13–20 at Stanford
2025-10-2514.2No game
2025-11-0152.5W 42–7 vs Wake Forest
2025-11-0857.6L 10–24 at Clemson
2025-11-1549.9W 34–14 vs Virginia Tech; L 11–21 at NC State
2025-11-2248.5No game
2025-11-2961.9L 21–40 at Florida
2025-12-06102.2No game
2025-12-1345.4No game
2025-12-2071.1No game
2025-12-2759.2No game
2026-01-0341.7No game
2026-01-1031.9No game
2026-01-1763.8No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 102.2 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 57.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks937
  • Group Hate60
  • Sexual Content23
  • Harm Wish9
  • Violent Threat3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability43
  • Gender42
  • Physical Appearance40
  • LGBTQIA+32
  • Race29
  • Age21
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Time for the physical part.💪

positiveFacebook

Go Noles!! My 2 granddaughters are alumni

positiveFacebook

Lmao this team is the worse how do you lose 4 straight

negativeFacebook

Obviously don’t have the players to run the 3-3-5. Continue to run the 3-3-5. 👍🏼

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.