Colorado

Buffaloes · 3–9 in 2025–26

Fan Score
595.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
13,180
2025–26 season
Positive share
59.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
15.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Colorado fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 3rd percentile · Explicit Language: 4th percentile · Harm: 21st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Colorado Harm: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado Explicit Language: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado College Sports: 55th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Off-Field Storylines: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Team & Front Office: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive59.5%7,848
Neutral8.5%1,122
Negative30.6%4,038
Mixed1.3%172

Signature subtags

What Colorado fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.2×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8.3 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.5×

Mentioned Recruiting at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.2 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.2×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

100.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 20Low: −32% · L 7–53 at UtahAug 29: L 20–27 vs Georgia TechLSep 6: W 31–7 vs DelawareWSep 12: L 20–36 at HoustonLSep 20: W 37–20 vs WyomingWSep 27: L 21–24 vs BYULOct 4: L 21–35 at TCULOct 11: W 24–17 vs Iowa StateWOct 25: L 7–53 at UtahLNov 1: L 17–52 vs ArizonaLNov 8: L 22–29 at West VirginiaLNov 22: L 17–42 vs Arizona StateLNov 29: L 14–24 at Kansas StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+62%47578638L 20–27 vs Georgia Tech
2025-08-30+21%360222645No game
2025-09-06+70%1,7762422,193W 31–7 vs Delaware; L 20–36 at Houston
2025-09-13−21%299490896No game
2025-09-20+55%669164918W 37–20 vs Wyoming
2025-09-27+17%421287780L 21–24 vs BYU
2025-10-04+5%222197459L 21–35 at TCU
2025-10-11+53%557156758W 24–17 vs Iowa State
2025-10-18+71%11715144No game
2025-10-25−32%266568930L 7–53 at Utah
2025-11-01−4%270296638L 17–52 vs Arizona
2025-11-08+30%371184631L 22–29 at West Virginia
2025-11-15+33%240112391No game
2025-11-22+45%459153681L 17–42 vs Arizona State
2025-11-29−1%400407899L 14–24 at Kansas State
2025-12-06+28%431220742No game
2025-12-13+36%572589No game
2025-12-20+100%27027No game
2025-12-27+30%12620No game
2026-01-03+23%241444No game
2026-01-10+40%16464250No game
2026-01-17+23%231138407No game
Fan mood fell 103 points the week they lost by 46 at Utah.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 29: L 20–27 vs Georgia TechLSep 6: W 31–7 vs DelawareWSep 12: L 20–36 at HoustonLSep 20: W 37–20 vs WyomingWSep 27: L 21–24 vs BYULOct 4: L 21–35 at TCULOct 11: W 24–17 vs Iowa StateWOct 25: L 7–53 at UtahLNov 1: L 17–52 vs ArizonaLNov 8: L 22–29 at West VirginiaLNov 22: L 17–42 vs Arizona StateLNov 29: L 14–24 at Kansas StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2374.5%12.2%638
2025-08-3055.8%34.4%645
2025-09-0681%11%2,193
2025-09-1333.4%54.7%896
2025-09-2072.9%17.9%918
2025-09-2754%36.8%780
2025-10-0448.4%42.9%459
2025-10-1173.5%20.6%758
2025-10-1881.3%10.4%144
2025-10-2528.6%61.1%930
2025-11-0142.3%46.4%638
2025-11-0858.8%29.2%631
2025-11-1561.4%28.6%391
2025-11-2267.4%22.5%681
2025-11-2944.5%45.3%899
2025-12-0658.1%29.6%742
2025-12-1364%28.1%89
2025-12-20100%0%27
2025-12-2760%30%20
2026-01-0354.5%31.8%44
2026-01-1065.6%25.6%250
2026-01-1756.8%33.9%407

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm13.8 per 1,000 · 182
Personal Attacks 174Group Hate 6Harm Wish 3
Identity-Based Abuse1.4 per 1,000 · 18
Age 7Race 3Physical Appearance 3Religion 1Gender 2LGBTQIA+ 1Disability 1
Explicit Language4 per 1,000 · 53
Explicit Acronym 27Explicit Words 24Violent Language 4
College Sports17.4 per 1,000 · 229
Recruiting 95Conference Realignment 5Transfer Portal 110NIL 28Student Section 4Band 2
Off-Field Storylines10.8 per 1,000 · 143
Broadcast & Media 92Injuries 33Officiating 18
Sports Betting4.1 per 1,000 · 54
Prop Bet 7Gambling 42Moneyline 1Parlay 4
Team & Front Office119 per 1,000 · 1,568
Coaching 1,329Crowd & Attendance 81Front Office 43Opponent Hostility 84Stadium Experience 17Opponent Respect 24Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

4th percentile
53 explicit comments4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym27
  • Explicit Words24
  • Violent Language4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 97th of 100 nationally, the 4th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 15.245.5 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 3)LWLWLLWLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2312.5L 20–27 vs Georgia Tech
2025-08-3012.4No game
2025-09-062.7W 31–7 vs Delaware; L 20–36 at Houston
2025-09-1322.3No game
2025-09-205.4W 37–20 vs Wyoming
2025-09-2712.8L 21–24 vs BYU
2025-10-0419.6L 21–35 at TCU
2025-10-116.6W 24–17 vs Iowa State
2025-10-180No game
2025-10-2530.1L 7–53 at Utah
2025-11-0126.6L 17–52 vs Arizona
2025-11-0815.8L 22–29 at West Virginia
2025-11-1530.7No game
2025-11-2211.7L 17–42 vs Arizona State
2025-11-2923.4L 14–24 at Kansas State
2025-12-0628.3No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0345.5No game
2026-01-1012No game
2026-01-1717.2No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 45.5 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 3)) against a season average of 15.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks174
  • Group Hate6
  • Harm Wish3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age7
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Race3
  • Gender2
  • Disability1
  • LGBTQIA+1
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

That is an elite suggestion 👌🏿

positiveFacebook

People stop hating, we are going to go 10-2, big 12 champions all the way to the CFP... #skobuffs

positiveFacebook

Utah up 43-0 @ halftime WOW. Still collecting receipts Coach Prime?

negativeFacebook

Good -they should take those other two clowns down !

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.