Colorado State

Rams · 2–10 in 2025–26

Compare Colorado State with…
Fan Score
431.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,505
2025–26 season
Positive share
43.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
34
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Colorado State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 98th percentile · College Sports: 96th percentile · Explicit Language: 18th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Colorado State Harm: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado State Explicit Language: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State College Sports: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Off-Field Storylines: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado State Team & Front Office: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive43.2%1,945
Neutral9.7%436
Negative45.4%2,045
Mixed1.8%79

Signature subtags

What Colorado State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
15.8×

Mentioned Player Conduct at 15.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.5 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
5.7×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 5.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

10.9 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
3×

Mentioned Recruiting at 3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

14.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +71% · week of Dec 13Low: −46% · L 3–20 vs Washington State, L 24–45 at San Diego StateAug 30: L 21–38 at WashingtonLSep 6: W 21–17 vs N ColoradoWSep 20: L 16–17 vs UTSALSep 27: L 3–20 vs Washington StateLOct 3: L 24–45 at San Diego StateLOct 10: W 49–21 vs Fresno StateWOct 18: L 19–31 vs HawaiiLOct 25: L 0–28 at WyomingLNov 8: L 10–42 vs UNLVLNov 15: L 17–20 at New MexicoLNov 22: L 21–49 at Boise StateLNov 28: L 21–42 vs Air ForceLAug 23Jan 10
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+67%59876No game
2025-08-30+39%21178337L 21–38 at Washington
2025-09-06−40%85232369W 21–17 vs N Colorado
2025-09-13+17%10718No game
2025-09-20−34%69156255L 16–17 vs UTSA
2025-09-27−46%83248360L 3–20 vs Washington State; L 24–45 at San Diego State
2025-10-04−25%118209371W 49–21 vs Fresno State
2025-10-11+55%23557326No game
2025-10-18−8%151181381L 19–31 vs Hawaii
2025-10-25−39%123302463L 0–28 at Wyoming
2025-11-01+10%8620No game
2025-11-08−12%5269146L 10–42 vs UNLV
2025-11-15+16%5639107L 17–20 at New Mexico
2025-11-22−2%278290640L 21–49 at Boise State; L 21–42 vs Air Force
2025-11-29+31%262128436No game
2025-12-06+41%491875No game
2025-12-13+71%17221No game
2025-12-20+70%8110No game
2025-12-27+66%611176No game
2026-01-03+40%6210No game
2026-01-10+38%418No game
Fan mood fell 79 points the week they beat N Colorado by 4.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%41%81%Aug 30: L 21–38 at WashingtonLSep 6: W 21–17 vs N ColoradoWSep 20: L 16–17 vs UTSALSep 27: L 3–20 vs Washington StateLOct 3: L 24–45 at San Diego StateLOct 10: W 49–21 vs Fresno StateWOct 18: L 19–31 vs HawaiiLOct 25: L 0–28 at WyomingLNov 8: L 10–42 vs UNLVLNov 15: L 17–20 at New MexicoLNov 22: L 21–49 at Boise StateLNov 28: L 21–42 vs Air ForceLAug 23Jan 10
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2377.6%10.5%76
2025-08-3062.6%23.1%337
2025-09-0623%62.9%369
2025-09-1355.6%38.9%18
2025-09-2027.1%61.2%255
2025-09-2723.1%68.9%360
2025-10-0431.8%56.3%371
2025-10-1172.1%17.5%326
2025-10-1839.6%47.5%381
2025-10-2526.6%65.2%463
2025-11-0140%30%20
2025-11-0835.6%47.3%146
2025-11-1552.3%36.4%107
2025-11-2243.4%45.3%640
2025-11-2960.1%29.4%436
2025-12-0665.3%24%75
2025-12-1381%9.5%21
2025-12-2080%10%10
2025-12-2780.3%14.5%76
2026-01-0360%20%10
2026-01-1050%12.5%8

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments 2 times this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm32 per 1,000 · 144
Personal Attacks 137Group Hate 3Sexual Content 3Harm Wish 3
Identity-Based Abuse2 per 1,000 · 9
Age 3Gender 2Physical Appearance 3LGBTQIA+ 1
Explicit Language7.5 per 1,000 · 34
Explicit Acronym 25Violent Language 1Explicit Words 10
College Sports40 per 1,000 · 180
Recruiting 64NIL 25Conference Realignment 49Transfer Portal 38Student Section 9Band 2
Off-Field Storylines34.9 per 1,000 · 157
Officiating 65Injuries 17Player Conduct 43Broadcast & Media 27Politics & Activism 5
Sports Betting4.4 per 1,000 · 20
Gambling 15Moneyline 1Prop Bet 2Parlay 2
Team & Front Office236.6 per 1,000 · 1,066
Crowd & Attendance 47Opponent Respect 30Coaching 850Stadium Experience 57Opponent Hostility 68Front Office 33Athletic Department 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

18th percentile
34 explicit comments7.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym25
  • Explicit Words10
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 83rd of 100 nationally, the 18th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 34125 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 10)LWLLLWLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-10
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3014.8L 21–38 at Washington
2025-09-0643.4W 21–17 vs N Colorado
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-2011.8L 16–17 vs UTSA
2025-09-2741.7L 3–20 vs Washington State; L 24–45 at San Diego State
2025-10-0424.3W 49–21 vs Fresno State
2025-10-1121.5No game
2025-10-1839.4L 19–31 vs Hawaii
2025-10-2536.7L 0–28 at Wyoming
2025-11-010No game
2025-11-0841.1L 10–42 vs UNLV
2025-11-1518.7L 17–20 at New Mexico
2025-11-2251.6L 21–49 at Boise State; L 21–42 vs Air Force
2025-11-2941.3No game
2025-12-0640No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-2739.5No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-10125No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 125 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 10)) against a season average of 34 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks137
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish3
  • Sexual Content3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age3
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Gender2
  • LGBTQIA+1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Awesome work, can't wait for the next one! 🐏 Like coming to Chick-fil-A

positiveFacebook

Continued success and thanks for your RAM contribution

positiveFacebook

Where's the team that played last week?

negativeFacebook

Redefining starts by getting Norvell out of here & bringing in someone that can truly turn the program around. Not another ‘meh’ MWC coach. Pony up and go get a stud!!!

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.