Troy

Trojans · 8–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
779.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
5,404
2025–26 season
Positive share
77.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
8.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Troy fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 5th percentile · Team & Front Office: 8th percentile · College Sports: 12th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Troy Harm: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Troy Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Troy Explicit Language: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Troy College Sports: 12th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Troy Off-Field Storylines: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Troy Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Troy Team & Front Office: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive77.9%4,210
Neutral8.5%459
Negative12.5%675
Mixed1.1%60

Signature subtags

What Troy fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.3×

Mentioned Band at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.4×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.3×

Mentioned Injuries at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8.1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 27Low: +22% · L 0–33 at Old DominionAug 30: W 38–20 vs NichollsWSep 6: L 16–27 at ClemsonLSep 13: L 7–28 vs MemphisLSep 20: W 21–17 at BuffaloWOct 4: W 31–24 (OT) vs South AlabamaWOct 11: W 48–41 (OT) at Texas StateWOct 18: W 37–14 at UL MonroeWOct 25: W 35–23 vs LouisianaWNov 1: L 10–23 vs Arkansas StateLNov 13: L 0–33 at Old DominionLNov 22: W 31–19 vs Georgia StateWNov 29: W 28–18 at Southern MissWDec 5: L 14–31 at James MadisonLDec 16: L 13–17 vs Jacksonville StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+48%25248No game
2025-08-30+75%24123292W 38–20 vs Nicholls
2025-09-06+70%21429263L 16–27 at Clemson
2025-09-13+33%512289L 7–28 vs Memphis
2025-09-20+74%25230298W 21–17 at Buffalo
2025-09-27+80%65279No game
2025-10-04+69%31137395W 31–24 (OT) vs South Alabama
2025-10-11+89%32512353W 48–41 (OT) at Texas State
2025-10-18+82%25313291W 37–14 at UL Monroe
2025-10-25+87%1597174W 35–23 vs Louisiana
2025-11-01+34%11753190L 10–23 vs Arkansas State
2025-11-08+22%13281232L 0–33 at Old Dominion
2025-11-15+66%41358No game
2025-11-22+84%1657187W 31–19 vs Georgia State
2025-11-29+86%81538904W 28–18 at Southern Miss; L 14–31 at James Madison
2025-12-06+32%572259976No game
2025-12-13+58%24353325L 13–17 vs Jacksonville State
2025-12-20+80%13115No game
2025-12-27+100%14014No game
2026-01-03+94%61164No game
2026-01-10+92%55159No game
2026-01-17+87%86198No game
Fan mood fell 54 points the week of Dec 6.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: W 38–20 vs NichollsWSep 6: L 16–27 at ClemsonLSep 13: L 7–28 vs MemphisLSep 20: W 21–17 at BuffaloWOct 4: W 31–24 (OT) vs South AlabamaWOct 11: W 48–41 (OT) at Texas StateWOct 18: W 37–14 at UL MonroeWOct 25: W 35–23 vs LouisianaWNov 1: L 10–23 vs Arkansas StateLNov 13: L 0–33 at Old DominionLNov 22: W 31–19 vs Georgia StateWNov 29: W 28–18 at Southern MissWDec 5: L 14–31 at James MadisonLDec 16: L 13–17 vs Jacksonville StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2352.1%4.2%48
2025-08-3082.5%7.9%292
2025-09-0681.4%11%263
2025-09-1357.3%24.7%89
2025-09-2084.6%10.1%298
2025-09-2782.3%2.5%79
2025-10-0478.7%9.4%395
2025-10-1192.1%3.4%353
2025-10-1886.9%4.5%291
2025-10-2591.4%4%174
2025-11-0161.6%27.9%190
2025-11-0856.9%34.9%232
2025-11-1570.7%5.2%58
2025-11-2288.2%3.7%187
2025-11-2990.2%4.2%904
2025-12-0658.6%26.5%976
2025-12-1374.8%16.3%325
2025-12-2086.7%6.7%15
2025-12-27100%0%14
2026-01-0395.3%1.6%64
2026-01-1093.2%1.7%59
2026-01-1787.8%1%98

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm8.1 per 1,000 · 44
Personal Attacks 41Group Hate 3Sexual Content 1Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse0.4 per 1,000 · 2
Age 1Physical Appearance 1
Explicit Language6.7 per 1,000 · 36
Explicit Words 30Explicit Acronym 7Violent Language 1Explicit Emoji 1
College Sports8.7 per 1,000 · 47
Transfer Portal 6Student Section 6Band 16Recruiting 10NIL 5Conference Realignment 4
Off-Field Storylines18.1 per 1,000 · 98
Injuries 44Broadcast & Media 37Officiating 14Player Conduct 3
Sports Betting1.5 per 1,000 · 8
Prop Bet 2Gambling 5Parlay 1
Team & Front Office74.6 per 1,000 · 403
Coaching 198Crowd & Attendance 46Stadium Experience 38Opponent Respect 21Opponent Hostility 101Front Office 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

13th percentile
36 explicit comments6.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words30
  • Explicit Acronym7
  • Explicit Emoji1
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 6.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 89th of 100 nationally, the 13th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 8.527.7 per 1,000 · L 13–17 vs Jacksonville StateWLLWWWWWLLWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300W 38–20 vs Nicholls
2025-09-063.8L 16–27 at Clemson
2025-09-130L 7–28 vs Memphis
2025-09-206.7W 21–17 at Buffalo
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-042.5W 31–24 (OT) vs South Alabama
2025-10-110W 48–41 (OT) at Texas State
2025-10-180W 37–14 at UL Monroe
2025-10-250W 35–23 vs Louisiana
2025-11-0110.5L 10–23 vs Arkansas State
2025-11-088.6L 0–33 at Old Dominion
2025-11-150No game
2025-11-220W 31–19 vs Georgia State
2025-11-295.5W 28–18 at Southern Miss; L 14–31 at James Madison
2025-12-0623.6No game
2025-12-1327.7L 13–17 vs Jacksonville State
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0315.6No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 27.7 per 1,000 comments (L 13–17 vs Jacksonville State) against a season average of 8.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks41
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish1
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age1
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Wishing the best for both of you! I couldn’t be prouder.

positiveFacebook

great job! let's go trojans in 2026🏈Troy Trojans Footballan

positiveFacebook

DID WE EVEN PRACTICE GYALLLLEEEE WE LOOKED TERRIBLE LAST NIGHT

negativeFacebook

Make changes to that O-Line!! And this team better come out from halftime with their butts on fire!! 🔥⚔🏈⚔🔥

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.