Charlotte

49ers · 1–11 in 2025–26

Fan Score
416.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
1,447
2025–26 season
Positive share
41.7%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
22.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Charlotte fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Charlotte Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive41.7%603
Neutral9.3%134
Negative46.6%675
Mixed2.4%35
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Sep 20Low: −57% · L 26–54 at South FloridaAug 29: L 11–34 vs Appalachian StateLSep 6: L 3–20 vs North CarolinaLSep 13: W 42–35 vs MonmouthWSep 18: L 17–28 vs RiceLOct 3: L 26–54 at South FloridaLOct 11: L 7–24 at ArmyLOct 18: L 14–49 vs TempleLOct 24: L 20–54 vs North TexasLNov 8: L 22–48 at East CarolinaLNov 15: L 7–28 vs UTSALNov 22: L 3–35 at GeorgiaLNov 29: L 0–27 at TulaneLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+89%809L 11–34 vs Appalachian State
2025-08-30−33%123No game
2025-09-06−13%6923L 3–20 vs North Carolina
2025-09-13+63%618W 42–35 vs Monmouth; L 17–28 vs Rice
2025-09-20+100%303No game
2025-09-27−57%157L 26–54 at South Florida
2025-10-04−25%91524No game
2025-10-11−11%4557114L 7–24 at Army
2025-10-18−13%3750101L 14–49 vs Temple; L 20–54 vs North Texas
2025-10-25−35%44102164No game
2025-11-01+43%9314No game
2025-11-08−16%5276151L 22–48 at East Carolina
2025-11-15−24%69122220L 7–28 vs UTSA
2025-11-22+12%9673188L 3–35 at Georgia
2025-11-29−6%96110223L 0–27 at Tulane
2025-12-06+15%231648No game
2025-12-13−50%63048No game
2025-12-20+100%404No game
2025-12-27+100%808No game
2026-01-03+86%20122No game
2026-01-10+88%48252No game
2026-01-17+85%12113No game
Fan mood fell 157 points the week they lost by 28 at South Florida.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 29: L 11–34 vs Appalachian StateLSep 6: L 3–20 vs North CarolinaLSep 13: W 42–35 vs MonmouthWSep 18: L 17–28 vs RiceLOct 3: L 26–54 at South FloridaLOct 11: L 7–24 at ArmyLOct 18: L 14–49 vs TempleLOct 24: L 20–54 vs North TexasLNov 8: L 22–48 at East CarolinaLNov 15: L 7–28 vs UTSALNov 22: L 3–35 at GeorgiaLNov 29: L 0–27 at TulaneLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2388.9%0%9
2025-08-3033.3%66.7%3
2025-09-0626.1%39.1%23
2025-09-1375%12.5%8
2025-09-20100%0%3
2025-09-2714.3%71.4%7
2025-10-0437.5%62.5%24
2025-10-1139.5%50%114
2025-10-1836.6%49.5%101
2025-10-2526.8%62.2%164
2025-11-0164.3%21.4%14
2025-11-0834.4%50.3%151
2025-11-1531.4%55.5%220
2025-11-2251.1%38.8%188
2025-11-2943%49.3%223
2025-12-0647.9%33.3%48
2025-12-1312.5%62.5%48
2025-12-20100%0%4
2025-12-27100%0%8
2026-01-0390.9%4.5%22
2026-01-1092.3%3.8%52
2026-01-1792.3%7.7%13

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm19.4 per 1,000 · 28
Personal Attacks 25Sexual Content 1Harm Wish 1Group Hate 1
Identity-Based Abuse3.5 per 1,000 · 5
Disability 3Physical Appearance 2
Explicit Language20 per 1,000 · 29
Explicit Words 25Explicit Acronym 6Explicit Emoji 1
College Sports62.9 per 1,000 · 91
NIL 33Recruiting 28Transfer Portal 17Band 13Conference Realignment 12Student Section 3
Off-Field Storylines17.3 per 1,000 · 25
Injuries 5Broadcast & Media 20
Sports Betting18 per 1,000 · 26
Gambling 20Prop Bet 4Moneyline 2
Team & Front Office145.8 per 1,000 · 211
Coaching 139Athletic Department 6Crowd & Attendance 17Stadium Experience 12Opponent Hostility 21Front Office 14Opponent Respect 8

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

29 explicit comments20 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words25
  • Explicit Acronym6
  • Explicit Emoji1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 20 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 22.8125 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Oct 4)LLWLLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230L 11–34 vs Appalachian State
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-060L 3–20 vs North Carolina
2025-09-130W 42–35 vs Monmouth; L 17–28 vs Rice
2025-09-200No game
2025-09-270L 26–54 at South Florida
2025-10-04125No game
2025-10-1117.5L 7–24 at Army
2025-10-189.9L 14–49 vs Temple; L 20–54 vs North Texas
2025-10-256.1No game
2025-11-010No game
2025-11-0846.4L 22–48 at East Carolina
2025-11-1522.7L 7–28 vs UTSA
2025-11-2210.6L 3–35 at Georgia
2025-11-2926.9L 0–27 at Tulane
2025-12-0620.8No game
2025-12-13104.2No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 125 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Oct 4)) against a season average of 22.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks25
  • Group Hate1
  • Harm Wish1
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability3
  • Physical Appearance2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Where can we find temp face tattoos??

positiveFacebook

Get ready to bounce back this year

positiveFacebook

So bad we need a new coach

negativeCoachingFacebook

“Best coach we’ve ever had”. I know it’s year one but this teams horrendous

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.