Auburn

Tigers · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
554.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
59,608
2025–26 season
Positive share
55.4%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
34.6
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Auburn fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 93rd percentile · Team & Front Office: 87th percentile · Explicit Language: 16th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Auburn Harm: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Identity-Based Abuse: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn College Sports: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Off-Field Storylines: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Team & Front Office: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive55.4%33,026
Neutral9.3%5,540
Negative33.6%20,034
Mixed1.7%1,008

Signature subtags

What Auburn fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
2.9×

Mentioned Officiating at 2.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

35.3 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.2×

Mentioned Athletic Department at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.1 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.7×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

146.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +59% · W 42–3 vs Ball StateLow: −35% · L 10–16 at Texas A&MAug 29: W 38–24 at BaylorWSep 6: W 42–3 vs Ball StateWSep 13: W 31–15 vs South AlabamaWSep 20: L 17–24 at OklahomaLSep 27: L 10–16 at Texas A&MLOct 11: L 10–20 vs GeorgiaLOct 18: L 17–23 (2OT) vs MissouriLOct 25: W 33–24 at ArkansasWNov 1: L 3–10 vs KentuckyLNov 8: L 38–45 (OT) at VanderbiltLNov 22: W 62–17 vs MercerWNov 29: L 20–27 vs AlabamaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+59%623120857W 38–24 at Baylor
2025-08-30+57%1,8734282,551No game
2025-09-06+59%1,6073342,161W 42–3 vs Ball State
2025-09-13+54%1,5944052,212W 31–15 vs South Alabama
2025-09-20+0%1,4621,4563,253L 17–24 at Oklahoma
2025-09-27−35%9252,0983,326L 10–16 at Texas A&M
2025-10-04+17%8045361,551No game
2025-10-11−18%1,3992,0943,863L 10–20 vs Georgia
2025-10-18−24%8541,4702,600L 17–23 (2OT) vs Missouri
2025-10-25+39%1,7817312,710W 33–24 at Arkansas
2025-11-01−24%8531,4962,680L 3–10 vs Kentucky
2025-11-08+41%2,4479433,692L 38–45 (OT) at Vanderbilt
2025-11-15+40%411146669No game
2025-11-22+56%4,7301,0586,504W 62–17 vs Mercer
2025-11-29+14%6,9255,06913,613L 20–27 vs Alabama
2025-12-06+37%1,5156092,454No game
2025-12-13+34%542241880No game
2025-12-20+36%19483311No game
2025-12-27+39%13051205No game
2026-01-03+54%1,4463362,055No game
2026-01-10+52%625148912No game
2026-01-17+19%286182549No game
Fan mood jumped 65 points the week they lost by 7 in OT at Vanderbilt.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%74%Aug 29: W 38–24 at BaylorWSep 6: W 42–3 vs Ball StateWSep 13: W 31–15 vs South AlabamaWSep 20: L 17–24 at OklahomaLSep 27: L 10–16 at Texas A&MLOct 11: L 10–20 vs GeorgiaLOct 18: L 17–23 (2OT) vs MissouriLOct 25: W 33–24 at ArkansasWNov 1: L 3–10 vs KentuckyLNov 8: L 38–45 (OT) at VanderbiltLNov 22: W 62–17 vs MercerWNov 29: L 20–27 vs AlabamaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2372.7%14%857
2025-08-3073.4%16.8%2,551
2025-09-0674.4%15.5%2,161
2025-09-1372.1%18.3%2,212
2025-09-2044.9%44.8%3,253
2025-09-2727.8%63.1%3,326
2025-10-0451.8%34.6%1,551
2025-10-1136.2%54.2%3,863
2025-10-1832.8%56.5%2,600
2025-10-2565.7%27%2,710
2025-11-0131.8%55.8%2,680
2025-11-0866.3%25.5%3,692
2025-11-1561.4%21.8%669
2025-11-2272.7%16.3%6,504
2025-11-2950.9%37.2%13,613
2025-12-0661.7%24.8%2,454
2025-12-1361.6%27.4%880
2025-12-2062.4%26.7%311
2025-12-2763.4%24.9%205
2026-01-0370.4%16.4%2,055
2026-01-1068.5%16.2%912
2026-01-1752.1%33.2%549

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm27.9 per 1,000 · 1,663
Group Hate 73Harm Wish 32Personal Attacks 1,563Sexual Content 44Violent Threat 2
Identity-Based Abuse6.7 per 1,000 · 399
Disability 71Age 46Gender 69LGBTQIA+ 11Physical Appearance 164Race 51Religion 1
Explicit Language7.3 per 1,000 · 438
Explicit Acronym 270Explicit Emoji 34Explicit Words 125Violent Language 19
College Sports16.9 per 1,000 · 1,006
Band 27Conference Realignment 51NIL 214Recruiting 358Student Section 16Transfer Portal 376
Off-Field Storylines46.8 per 1,000 · 2,789
Broadcast & Media 462Injuries 154Officiating 2,106Player Conduct 60Politics & Activism 22
Sports Betting2.4 per 1,000 · 142
Gambling 110Moneyline 12Parlay 2Prop Bet 18
Team & Front Office182.8 per 1,000 · 10,895
Coaching 8,717Crowd & Attendance 342Front Office 338Opponent Hostility 995Opponent Respect 347Athletic Department 65Stadium Experience 267

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

16th percentile
438 explicit comments7.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym270
  • Explicit Words125
  • Explicit Emoji34
  • Violent Language19

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 85th of 100 nationally, the 16th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 34.687.4 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWLLLLWLLWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2335W 38–24 at Baylor
2025-08-3020.8No game
2025-09-0625.5W 42–3 vs Ball State
2025-09-1320.3W 31–15 vs South Alabama
2025-09-2032.6L 17–24 at Oklahoma
2025-09-2734.9L 10–16 at Texas A&M
2025-10-0435.5No game
2025-10-1144L 10–20 vs Georgia
2025-10-1844.2L 17–23 (2OT) vs Missouri
2025-10-2532.1W 33–24 at Arkansas
2025-11-0135.8L 3–10 vs Kentucky
2025-11-0824.4L 38–45 (OT) at Vanderbilt
2025-11-1519.4No game
2025-11-2219.4W 62–17 vs Mercer
2025-11-2942.2L 20–27 vs Alabama
2025-12-0656.6No game
2025-12-1347.7No game
2025-12-2032.2No game
2025-12-2743.9No game
2026-01-0325.3No game
2026-01-1032.9No game
2026-01-1787.4No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 87.4 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 34.6 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks1,563
  • Group Hate73
  • Sexual Content44
  • Harm Wish32
  • Violent Threat2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance164
  • Disability71
  • Gender69
  • Race51
  • Age46
  • LGBTQIA+11
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Go cousin 75.See you in Oklahoma 😄

positiveFacebook

"C'MON JARRETT", just like BO, show 'em, who be 'da cheese! 🙂 🏈 👌 "W D E"

positiveFacebook

Freeze gonna be laughing all the way to the bank on Monday

negativeFacebook

Always an Auburn fan good or horribly bad war Eagle! Freeze gotta go though

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.