Pittsburgh

Panthers · 8–5 in 2025–26

Fan Score
520.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
26,366
2025–26 season
Positive share
52%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
41.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Pittsburgh fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 71st percentile · Explicit Language: 33rd percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 40th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Pittsburgh Harm: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh Identity-Based Abuse: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh Explicit Language: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh College Sports: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh Off-Field Storylines: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh Sports Betting: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Pittsburgh Team & Front Office: 51st percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive52%13,720
Neutral11.3%2,971
Negative35.1%9,266
Mixed1.6%409

Signature subtags

What Pittsburgh fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.6×

Mentioned Student Section at 2.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.8 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.8×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.5 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.6×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.7 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +59% · W 53–34 vs NC StateLow: −48% · L 27–34 vs LouisvilleAug 30: W 61–9 vs DuquesneWSep 6: W 45–17 vs Central MichiganWSep 13: L 24–31 (OT) at West VirginiaLSep 27: L 27–34 vs LouisvilleLOct 4: W 48–7 vs Boston CollegeWOct 11: W 34–31 at Florida StateWOct 18: W 30–13 at SyracuseWOct 25: W 53–34 vs NC StateWNov 1: W 35–20 at StanfordWNov 15: L 15–37 vs Notre DameLNov 22: W 42–28 at Georgia TechWNov 29: L 7–38 vs MiamiLDec 27: L 17–23 vs East CarolinaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+45%25868425No game
2025-08-30+25%8344681,469W 61–9 vs Duquesne
2025-09-06+34%572257933W 45–17 vs Central Michigan
2025-09-13−38%4681,1381,758L 24–31 (OT) at West Virginia
2025-09-20+20%217138393No game
2025-09-27−48%2428041,159L 27–34 vs Louisville
2025-10-04+55%42496600W 48–7 vs Boston College
2025-10-11+54%8502231,169W 34–31 at Florida State
2025-10-18+48%587177863W 30–13 at Syracuse
2025-10-25+59%9211931,240W 53–34 vs NC State
2025-11-01+46%9262661,422W 35–20 at Stanford
2025-11-08+37%1,1574082,031No game
2025-11-15+12%1,3521,0272,705L 15–37 vs Notre Dame
2025-11-22+26%1,4217752,528W 42–28 at Georgia Tech
2025-11-29+20%7284681,318L 7–38 vs Miami
2025-12-06+0%4354351,012No game
2025-12-13+26%9785241,751No game
2025-12-20+45%522161796No game
2025-12-27−38%4741,1541,810L 17–23 vs East Carolina
2026-01-03−21%110180335No game
2026-01-10−7%168198448No game
2026-01-17−16%76108201No game
Fan mood jumped 103 points the week they beat Boston College by 41.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%74%Aug 30: W 61–9 vs DuquesneWSep 6: W 45–17 vs Central MichiganWSep 13: L 24–31 (OT) at West VirginiaLSep 27: L 27–34 vs LouisvilleLOct 4: W 48–7 vs Boston CollegeWOct 11: W 34–31 at Florida StateWOct 18: W 30–13 at SyracuseWOct 25: W 53–34 vs NC StateWNov 1: W 35–20 at StanfordWNov 15: L 15–37 vs Notre DameLNov 22: W 42–28 at Georgia TechWNov 29: L 7–38 vs MiamiLDec 27: L 17–23 vs East CarolinaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2360.7%16%425
2025-08-3056.8%31.9%1,469
2025-09-0661.3%27.5%933
2025-09-1326.6%64.7%1,758
2025-09-2055.2%35.1%393
2025-09-2720.9%69.4%1,159
2025-10-0470.7%16%600
2025-10-1172.7%19.1%1,169
2025-10-1868%20.5%863
2025-10-2574.3%15.6%1,240
2025-11-0165.1%18.7%1,422
2025-11-0857%20.1%2,031
2025-11-1550%38%2,705
2025-11-2256.2%30.7%2,528
2025-11-2955.2%35.5%1,318
2025-12-0643%43%1,012
2025-12-1355.9%29.9%1,751
2025-12-2065.6%20.2%796
2025-12-2726.2%63.8%1,810
2026-01-0332.8%53.7%335
2026-01-1037.5%44.2%448
2026-01-1737.8%53.7%201

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm35.2 per 1,000 · 928
Personal Attacks 878Group Hate 42Sexual Content 20Harm Wish 10
Identity-Based Abuse6 per 1,000 · 159
Physical Appearance 46LGBTQIA+ 17Race 13Religion 7Gender 38Disability 28Age 17
Explicit Language13.1 per 1,000 · 346
Explicit Acronym 91Explicit Words 229Explicit Emoji 19Violent Language 12
College Sports14.8 per 1,000 · 389
Band 49Student Section 48Transfer Portal 81Recruiting 106NIL 92Conference Realignment 29
Off-Field Storylines30.3 per 1,000 · 799
Injuries 246Officiating 235Broadcast & Media 307Player Conduct 9Politics & Activism 8
Sports Betting2.9 per 1,000 · 77
Gambling 65Moneyline 4Prop Bet 7Parlay 1
Team & Front Office123 per 1,000 · 3,242
Stadium Experience 202Coaching 1,787Crowd & Attendance 461Opponent Hostility 660Opponent Respect 126Front Office 84Athletic Department 17

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

33rd percentile
346 explicit comments13.1 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words229
  • Explicit Acronym91
  • Explicit Emoji19
  • Violent Language12

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 13.1 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 68th of 100 nationally, the 33rd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 41.281.4 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Sep 20)WWLLWWWWWLWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2316.5No game
2025-08-3043.6W 61–9 vs Duquesne
2025-09-0646.1W 45–17 vs Central Michigan
2025-09-1366L 24–31 (OT) at West Virginia
2025-09-2081.4No game
2025-09-2769.9L 27–34 vs Louisville
2025-10-0416.7W 48–7 vs Boston College
2025-10-1126.5W 34–31 at Florida State
2025-10-1827.8W 30–13 at Syracuse
2025-10-2517.7W 53–34 vs NC State
2025-11-0121.1W 35–20 at Stanford
2025-11-0834.5No game
2025-11-1554L 15–37 vs Notre Dame
2025-11-2227.7W 42–28 at Georgia Tech
2025-11-2928.8L 7–38 vs Miami
2025-12-0635.6No game
2025-12-1355.4No game
2025-12-2033.9No game
2025-12-2763L 17–23 vs East Carolina
2026-01-0329.9No game
2026-01-1031.3No game
2026-01-1724.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 81.4 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Sep 20)) against a season average of 41.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks878
  • Group Hate42
  • Sexual Content20
  • Harm Wish10
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance46
  • Gender38
  • Disability28
  • Age17
  • LGBTQIA+17
  • Race13
  • Religion7

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Let’s Go Jake!! So proud of you!! It’s going to be a great season 💙💛 🏈

positiveFacebook

Now that Jax is gone, Mccort would win one match and Pinned in 8.

positiveFacebook

You all got your asses whooped today

negativeExplicit WordsFacebook

Amazing. Am I the only one that thinks they need to move on from him?

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.