Kansas

Jayhawks · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
440.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
8,065
2025–26 season
Positive share
44.1%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
56.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Kansas fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 89th percentile · Sports Betting: 89th percentile · Explicit Language: 75th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Kansas Harm: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Identity-Based Abuse: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Explicit Language: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas College Sports: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Off-Field Storylines: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Sports Betting: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Team & Front Office: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive44.1%3,556
Neutral12.7%1,028
Negative41.5%3,346
Mixed1.7%135

Signature subtags

What Kansas fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
3.8×

Mentioned Athletic Department at 3.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.9×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

14 per 1,000 comments
Sports Betting
1.6×

Mentioned Gambling at 1.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +56% · W 27–20 at UCFLow: −48% · L 17–42 vs Kansas StateAug 23: W 31–7 vs Fresno StateWAug 29: W 46–7 vs WagnerWSep 6: L 31–42 at MissouriLSep 20: W 41–10 vs West VirginiaWSep 27: L 34–37 vs CincinnatiLOct 4: W 27–20 at UCFWOct 11: L 17–42 at Texas TechLOct 25: L 17–42 vs Kansas StateLNov 1: W 38–21 vs Oklahoma StateWNov 8: L 20–24 at ArizonaLNov 22: L 14–38 at Iowa StateLNov 28: L 21–31 vs UtahLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+42%564193875W 31–7 vs Fresno State; W 46–7 vs Wagner
2025-08-30+8%273220625No game
2025-09-06−10%219276565L 31–42 at Missouri
2025-09-13+16%9356232No game
2025-09-20+48%18752284W 41–10 vs West Virginia
2025-09-27−28%139273476L 34–37 vs Cincinnati
2025-10-04+56%565136768W 27–20 at UCF
2025-10-11−22%114191346L 17–42 at Texas Tech
2025-10-18+32%20673417No game
2025-10-25−48%180604878L 17–42 vs Kansas State
2025-11-01+9%166133355W 38–21 vs Oklahoma State
2025-11-08−41%94256391L 20–24 at Arizona
2025-11-15+40%562187No game
2025-11-22−33%2896241,008L 14–38 at Iowa State; L 21–31 vs Utah
2025-11-29+23%8752152No game
2025-12-06+22%10061180No game
2025-12-13+16%5034100No game
2025-12-20+9%5411No game
2025-12-27+52%8322117No game
2026-01-03+15%443184No game
2026-01-10+40%5110No game
2026-01-17+4%3733104No game
Fan mood jumped 84 points the week they beat UCF by 7.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%74%Aug 23: W 31–7 vs Fresno StateWAug 29: W 46–7 vs WagnerWSep 6: L 31–42 at MissouriLSep 20: W 41–10 vs West VirginiaWSep 27: L 34–37 vs CincinnatiLOct 4: W 27–20 at UCFWOct 11: L 17–42 at Texas TechLOct 25: L 17–42 vs Kansas StateLNov 1: W 38–21 vs Oklahoma StateWNov 8: L 20–24 at ArizonaLNov 22: L 14–38 at Iowa StateLNov 28: L 21–31 vs UtahLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2364.5%22.1%875
2025-08-3043.7%35.2%625
2025-09-0638.8%48.8%565
2025-09-1340.1%24.1%232
2025-09-2065.8%18.3%284
2025-09-2729.2%57.4%476
2025-10-0473.6%17.7%768
2025-10-1132.9%55.2%346
2025-10-1849.4%17.5%417
2025-10-2520.5%68.8%878
2025-11-0146.8%37.5%355
2025-11-0824%65.5%391
2025-11-1564.4%24.1%87
2025-11-2228.7%61.9%1,008
2025-11-2957.2%34.2%152
2025-12-0655.6%33.9%180
2025-12-1350%34%100
2025-12-2045.5%36.4%11
2025-12-2770.9%18.8%117
2026-01-0352.4%36.9%84
2026-01-1050%10%10
2026-01-1735.6%31.7%104

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm48.4 per 1,000 · 390
Personal Attacks 361Group Hate 21Harm Wish 7Sexual Content 13Violent Threat 1
Identity-Based Abuse8.4 per 1,000 · 68
Gender 15Physical Appearance 15Age 11Race 8Disability 14LGBTQIA+ 6Religion 1
Explicit Language32.7 per 1,000 · 264
Explicit Words 226Explicit Acronym 31Explicit Emoji 8Violent Language 5
College Sports13.3 per 1,000 · 107
NIL 34Recruiting 26Conference Realignment 7Student Section 9Transfer Portal 21Band 14
Off-Field Storylines30.9 per 1,000 · 249
Broadcast & Media 129Officiating 59Injuries 52Player Conduct 5Politics & Activism 4
Sports Betting5.2 per 1,000 · 42
Gambling 35Prop Bet 6Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office134.9 per 1,000 · 1,088
Stadium Experience 113Opponent Hostility 234Coaching 609Crowd & Attendance 92Front Office 18Opponent Respect 31Athletic Department 15

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

75th percentile
264 explicit comments32.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words226
  • Explicit Acronym31
  • Explicit Emoji8
  • Violent Language5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 32.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 26th of 100 nationally, the 75th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 56.884.4 per 1,000 · L 20–24 at ArizonaWWLWLWLLWLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2383.4W 31–7 vs Fresno State; W 46–7 vs Wagner
2025-08-3065.6No game
2025-09-0661.9L 31–42 at Missouri
2025-09-1364.7No game
2025-09-2052.8W 41–10 vs West Virginia
2025-09-2742L 34–37 vs Cincinnati
2025-10-0424.7W 27–20 at UCF
2025-10-1143.4L 17–42 at Texas Tech
2025-10-1821.6No game
2025-10-2575.2L 17–42 vs Kansas State
2025-11-0176.1W 38–21 vs Oklahoma State
2025-11-0884.4L 20–24 at Arizona
2025-11-1511.5No game
2025-11-2259.5L 14–38 at Iowa State; L 21–31 vs Utah
2025-11-2952.6No game
2025-12-0650No game
2025-12-1340No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-2717.1No game
2026-01-0347.6No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-1719.2No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 84.4 per 1,000 comments (L 20–24 at Arizona) against a season average of 56.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks361
  • Group Hate21
  • Sexual Content13
  • Harm Wish7
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender15
  • Physical Appearance15
  • Disability14
  • Age11
  • Race8
  • LGBTQIA+6
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Let's do this Jayhawks!! We believe in you! Never give up, Rock Chalk!

positiveFacebook

THIS MADE MY DAY!! Kory’s confidence in “IT’S THE ONLY RIGHT WAY TO DO IT”😂. The classical piece in the background made me giggle even more. One of my favorite pieces.

positiveFacebook

No final score post? Cowards run this social media at KU!

negativeFacebook

The game was an embarrassment, but the program is not! 🏈

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.