Tulsa ranks 3rd of 120 ranked FBS teams for Fan Score.
Tulsa ranks 110th of 138 ranked FBS teams for Comment volume.
Tulsa ranks 3rd of 120 ranked FBS teams for Positive share.
Who they are
The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Tulsa fans raise more than the average fanbase.
Comment-section fingerprint
- Tulsa Harm: low volume, not ranked
- Tulsa Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Tulsa Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- Tulsa College Sports: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulsa Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulsa Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Tulsa Team & Front Office: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
Sentiment
Signature subtags
What Tulsa fans bring up more than the average classified fanbase, across all 138 FBS fanbases. Harm and identity-based abuse are left out here; they sit in this team’s own moderation snapshot.
Mentioned Recruiting at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.
Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.
How the season felt
Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.
Season heartbeat
Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.
| Week of | Net mood | Positive | Negative | Comments | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | +63% | 28 | 3 | 40 | No game |
| 2025-08-30 | +89% | 181 | 3 | 201 | W 35–7 vs Abilene Chrstn |
| 2025-09-06 | +64% | 111 | 21 | 140 | L 14–21 at New Mexico State |
| 2025-09-13 | +58% | 101 | 22 | 136 | L 23–42 vs Navy; W 19–12 at Oklahoma State |
| 2025-09-20 | +75% | 281 | 32 | 331 | No game |
| 2025-09-27 | +46% | 44 | 13 | 68 | L 14–31 vs Tulane |
| 2025-10-04 | +61% | 68 | 13 | 90 | L 7–45 at Memphis |
| 2025-10-11 | +79% | 82 | 8 | 94 | L 27–41 at East Carolina |
| 2025-10-18 | +80% | 47 | 3 | 55 | No game |
| 2025-10-25 | +73% | 39 | 4 | 48 | L 37–38 (OT) vs Temple |
| 2025-11-01 | +86% | 43 | 1 | 49 | No game |
| 2025-11-08 | +53% | 55 | 13 | 80 | L 21–40 at Florida Atlantic |
| 2025-11-15 | +95% | 183 | 3 | 190 | W 31–14 vs Oregon State |
| 2025-11-22 | +85% | 396 | 22 | 439 | W 26–25 at Army |
| 2025-11-29 | +73% | 161 | 16 | 199 | L 24–31 vs UAB |
| 2025-12-06 | +95% | 19 | 0 | 20 | No game |
| 2025-12-13 | +95% | 36 | 0 | 38 | No game |
| 2025-12-20 | +100% | 20 | 0 | 20 | No game |
| 2025-12-27 | +50% | 79 | 18 | 123 | No game |
| 2026-01-03 | +76% | 129 | 9 | 158 | No game |
| 2026-01-10 | +91% | 84 | 0 | 92 | No game |
| 2026-01-17 | +85% | 59 | 3 | 66 | No game |
Season trend
Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.
| Week of | Positive | Negative | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 70% | 7.5% | 40 |
| 2025-08-30 | 90% | 1.5% | 201 |
| 2025-09-06 | 79.3% | 15% | 140 |
| 2025-09-13 | 74.3% | 16.2% | 136 |
| 2025-09-20 | 84.9% | 9.7% | 331 |
| 2025-09-27 | 64.7% | 19.1% | 68 |
| 2025-10-04 | 75.6% | 14.4% | 90 |
| 2025-10-11 | 87.2% | 8.5% | 94 |
| 2025-10-18 | 85.5% | 5.5% | 55 |
| 2025-10-25 | 81.3% | 8.3% | 48 |
| 2025-11-01 | 87.8% | 2% | 49 |
| 2025-11-08 | 68.8% | 16.3% | 80 |
| 2025-11-15 | 96.3% | 1.6% | 190 |
| 2025-11-22 | 90.2% | 5% | 439 |
| 2025-11-29 | 80.9% | 8% | 199 |
| 2025-12-06 | 95% | 0% | 20 |
| 2025-12-13 | 94.7% | 0% | 38 |
| 2025-12-20 | 100% | 0% | 20 |
| 2025-12-27 | 64.2% | 14.6% | 123 |
| 2026-01-03 | 81.6% | 5.7% | 158 |
| 2026-01-10 | 91.3% | 0% | 92 |
| 2026-01-17 | 89.4% | 4.5% | 66 |
Season timeline
- Aug 30W 35–7vs Abilene Chrstn
- Sep 6L 14–21at New Mexico State
- Sep 13L 23–42vs Navy
- Sep 19W 19–12at Oklahoma State
- Sep 27L 14–31vs Tulane
- Oct 4L 7–45at Memphis
- Oct 16L 27–41at East Carolina
- Oct 25L 37–38vs Temple (OT)
- Nov 8L 21–40at Florida Atlantic
- Nov 15W 31–14vs Oregon State
- Nov 22W 26–25at Army
- Nov 29L 24–31vs UAB
What they actually said
The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.
Comment insights
Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.
Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.
The Swear Jar
Too few comments to rank nationally.
- Explicit Words17
- Explicit Acronym3
- Violent Language2
- Explicit Emoji1
Tag applications, which may overlap.
How toxic is the Tulsa fanbase?
Over the 2025–26 season, Tulsa’s comment section ran at 7.1 harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments. The page falls under the comment volume Sence ranks on, so it is not placed against other fanbases.
Moderation snapshot
| Week of | Rate per 1,000 | Games |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-08-30 | 0 | W 35–7 vs Abilene Chrstn |
| 2025-09-06 | 28.6 | L 14–21 at New Mexico State |
| 2025-09-13 | 7.4 | L 23–42 vs Navy; W 19–12 at Oklahoma State |
| 2025-09-20 | 12.1 | No game |
| 2025-09-27 | 0 | L 14–31 vs Tulane |
| 2025-10-04 | 0 | L 7–45 at Memphis |
| 2025-10-11 | 0 | L 27–41 at East Carolina |
| 2025-10-18 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-10-25 | 0 | L 37–38 (OT) vs Temple |
| 2025-11-01 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-11-08 | 0 | L 21–40 at Florida Atlantic |
| 2025-11-15 | 0 | W 31–14 vs Oregon State |
| 2025-11-22 | 4.6 | W 26–25 at Army |
| 2025-11-29 | 5 | L 24–31 vs UAB |
| 2025-12-06 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-12-13 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-12-20 | 0 | No game |
| 2025-12-27 | 24.4 | No game |
| 2026-01-03 | 19 | No game |
| 2026-01-10 | 0 | No game |
| 2026-01-17 | 15.2 | No game |
Season subtag split
Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.
- Personal Attacks15
- Group Hate1
- Harm Wish1
- Gender2
Tag applications, which may overlap.
Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.
From the comment section
“Congratulations!! #ReignCane🌀”
“What a gift Grant is , that young man is going places !”
“Why can’t TU hire a good coach anymore?”
“ECU fan here. Glad you won! You guys look like us. Get too conservative... Play to lose”