Memphis

Tigers · 8–5 in 2025–26

Fan Score
703.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
12,047
2025–26 season
Positive share
70.3%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
23.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Memphis fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 11th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 15th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Memphis Harm: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis College Sports: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Off-Field Storylines: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Sports Betting: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive70.3%8,474
Neutral10%1,201
Negative18.3%2,208
Mixed1.4%164

Signature subtags

What Memphis fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.8×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 2.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

5.3 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.7×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 2.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

26.6 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.2×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

11 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +86% · week of Jan 17Low: +2% · week of Nov 29Aug 30: W 45–10 vs ChattanoogaWSep 6: W 38–16 at Georgia StateWSep 13: W 28–7 at TroyWSep 20: W 32–31 vs ArkansasWSep 27: W 55–26 at Florida AtlanticWOct 4: W 45–7 vs TulsaWOct 18: L 24–31 at UABLOct 25: W 34–31 vs South FloridaWOct 31: W 38–14 at RiceWNov 7: L 32–38 vs TulaneLNov 15: L 27–31 at East CarolinaLNov 27: L 17–28 vs NavyLDec 19: L 7–31 vs NC StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+61%16929230No game
2025-08-30+54%48099707W 45–10 vs Chattanooga
2025-09-06+57%18640254W 38–16 at Georgia State
2025-09-13+53%38890562W 28–7 at Troy
2025-09-20+49%1,4804432,135W 32–31 vs Arkansas
2025-09-27+61%34559470W 55–26 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-04+77%56051662W 45–7 vs Tulsa
2025-10-11+35%15560272No game
2025-10-18+36%15766252L 24–31 at UAB
2025-10-25+67%785115998W 34–31 vs South Florida; W 38–14 at Rice
2025-11-01+56%30363429L 32–38 vs Tulane
2025-11-08+24%173100305No game
2025-11-15+24%10460186L 27–31 at East Carolina
2025-11-22+55%17040236L 17–28 vs Navy
2025-11-29+2%155149372No game
2025-12-06+55%1,5833952,173No game
2025-12-13+45%559187832L 7–31 vs NC State
2025-12-20+56%15836218No game
2025-12-27+47%12139176No game
2026-01-03+35%9341149No game
2026-01-10+46%11035164No game
2026-01-17+86%24011265No game
Fan mood fell 54 points the week of Nov 29.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%45%91%Aug 30: W 45–10 vs ChattanoogaWSep 6: W 38–16 at Georgia StateWSep 13: W 28–7 at TroyWSep 20: W 32–31 vs ArkansasWSep 27: W 55–26 at Florida AtlanticWOct 4: W 45–7 vs TulsaWOct 18: L 24–31 at UABLOct 25: W 34–31 vs South FloridaWOct 31: W 38–14 at RiceWNov 7: L 32–38 vs TulaneLNov 15: L 27–31 at East CarolinaLNov 27: L 17–28 vs NavyLDec 19: L 7–31 vs NC StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2373.5%12.6%230
2025-08-3067.9%14%707
2025-09-0673.2%15.7%254
2025-09-1369%16%562
2025-09-2069.3%20.7%2,135
2025-09-2773.4%12.6%470
2025-10-0484.6%7.7%662
2025-10-1157%22.1%272
2025-10-1862.3%26.2%252
2025-10-2578.7%11.5%998
2025-11-0170.6%14.7%429
2025-11-0856.7%32.8%305
2025-11-1555.9%32.3%186
2025-11-2272%16.9%236
2025-11-2941.7%40.1%372
2025-12-0672.8%18.2%2,173
2025-12-1367.2%22.5%832
2025-12-2072.5%16.5%218
2025-12-2768.8%22.2%176
2026-01-0362.4%27.5%149
2026-01-1067.1%21.3%164
2026-01-1790.6%4.2%265

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm19.7 per 1,000 · 237
Personal Attacks 224Group Hate 11Sexual Content 4Violent Threat 1Harm Wish 2
Identity-Based Abuse3.8 per 1,000 · 46
Age 7Physical Appearance 12Race 5Gender 12Religion 3Disability 6LGBTQIA+ 2
Explicit Language6.6 per 1,000 · 79
Explicit Acronym 27Violent Language 6Explicit Words 46
College Sports15.3 per 1,000 · 184
Transfer Portal 18Recruiting 64Conference Realignment 64NIL 34Band 10Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines17.4 per 1,000 · 210
Broadcast & Media 112Officiating 67Injuries 25Politics & Activism 8Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting2.7 per 1,000 · 32
Moneyline 1Gambling 24Prop Bet 4Parlay 3
Team & Front Office134.4 per 1,000 · 1,619
Crowd & Attendance 321Coaching 957Opponent Hostility 173Stadium Experience 133Opponent Respect 45Front Office 20Athletic Department 7

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

11th percentile
79 explicit comments6.6 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words46
  • Explicit Acronym27
  • Violent Language6

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 6.6 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 91st of 100 nationally, the 11th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 23.567.2 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Nov 29)WWWWWWLWWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2313No game
2025-08-3014.1W 45–10 vs Chattanooga
2025-09-063.9W 38–16 at Georgia State
2025-09-1337.4W 28–7 at Troy
2025-09-2022.5W 32–31 vs Arkansas
2025-09-2712.8W 55–26 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-0410.6W 45–7 vs Tulsa
2025-10-1122.1No game
2025-10-1815.9L 24–31 at UAB
2025-10-2515W 34–31 vs South Florida; W 38–14 at Rice
2025-11-012.3L 32–38 vs Tulane
2025-11-0855.7No game
2025-11-1532.3L 27–31 at East Carolina
2025-11-2216.9L 17–28 vs Navy
2025-11-2967.2No game
2025-12-0629No game
2025-12-1334.9L 7–31 vs NC State
2025-12-2032.1No game
2025-12-2711.4No game
2026-01-0347No game
2026-01-106.1No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 67.2 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Nov 29)) against a season average of 23.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks224
  • Group Hate11
  • Sexual Content4
  • Harm Wish2
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender12
  • Physical Appearance12
  • Age7
  • Disability6
  • Race5
  • Religion3
  • LGBTQIA+2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

We need a statue of Fred Smith on campus. Few have done as much as he has for the school.

positiveFacebook

Awesome 👏 Congratulations to all !!!

positiveFacebook

Carl F Ray must going to loose

negativeFacebook

How'd that work out!!?? Just messing.. yall had us in our heels.. our OC is terrible. He has the right game plan but came out in second half and did what he normally does.. kills us. Good game though for real.🌊

mixedCoachingOpponent RespectFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.