Navy

Midshipmen · 11–2 in 2025–26

Fan Score
862
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
5,239
2025–26 season
Positive share
86.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
6.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Navy fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 1st percentile · Explicit Language: 16th percentile · Team & Front Office: 18th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Harm, Identity-Based Abuse, College Sports, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Navy Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Navy Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Navy Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Navy College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Navy Off-Field Storylines: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Navy Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Navy Team & Front Office: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive86.2%4,516
Neutral5.4%284
Negative7.1%372
Mixed1.3%67

Signature subtags

What Navy fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
2.2×

Mentioned Opponent Hostility at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

63.2 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.4×

Mentioned Opponent Respect at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.5 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
0.3×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 0.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Sep 20Low: +20% · W 52–7 vs VMIAug 30: W 52–7 vs VMIWSep 6: W 38–24 vs UABWSep 13: W 42–23 at TulsaWSep 27: W 21–13 vs RiceWOct 4: W 34–31 vs Air ForceWOct 11: W 32–31 at TempleWOct 25: W 42–32 vs Florida AtlanticWNov 1: L 17–31 at North TexasLNov 8: L 10–49 at Notre DameLNov 15: W 41–38 vs South FloridaWNov 27: W 28–17 at MemphisWDec 13: W 17–16 vs ArmyWJan 2: W 35–13 vs CincinnatiWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+95%19020No game
2025-08-30+20%325W 52–7 vs VMI
2025-09-06+72%16118199W 38–24 vs UAB
2025-09-13+83%20123W 42–23 at Tulsa
2025-09-20+100%202No game
2025-09-27+78%1168139W 21–13 vs Rice
2025-10-04+84%35323395W 34–31 vs Air Force
2025-10-11+84%66944745W 32–31 at Temple
2025-10-18+83%37341No game
2025-10-25+88%31410346W 42–32 vs Florida Atlantic
2025-11-01+65%14926190L 17–31 at North Texas
2025-11-08+54%671597L 10–49 at Notre Dame
2025-11-15+82%43627500W 41–38 vs South Florida
2025-11-22+81%57242655W 28–17 at Memphis
2025-11-29+80%22018253No game
2025-12-06+73%30737369No game
2025-12-13+76%70673833W 17–16 vs Army
2025-12-20+57%16323No game
2025-12-27+77%80893W 35–13 vs Cincinnati
2026-01-03+82%26114301No game
2026-01-10+75%608No game
2026-01-17+100%202No game
Fan mood fell 75 points the week they beat VMI by 45.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: W 52–7 vs VMIWSep 6: W 38–24 vs UABWSep 13: W 42–23 at TulsaWSep 27: W 21–13 vs RiceWOct 4: W 34–31 vs Air ForceWOct 11: W 32–31 at TempleWOct 25: W 42–32 vs Florida AtlanticWNov 1: L 17–31 at North TexasLNov 8: L 10–49 at Notre DameLNov 15: W 41–38 vs South FloridaWNov 27: W 28–17 at MemphisWDec 13: W 17–16 vs ArmyWJan 2: W 35–13 vs CincinnatiWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2395%0%20
2025-08-3060%40%5
2025-09-0680.9%9%199
2025-09-1387%4.3%23
2025-09-20100%0%2
2025-09-2783.5%5.8%139
2025-10-0489.4%5.8%395
2025-10-1189.8%5.9%745
2025-10-1890.2%7.3%41
2025-10-2590.8%2.9%346
2025-11-0178.4%13.7%190
2025-11-0869.1%15.5%97
2025-11-1587.2%5.4%500
2025-11-2287.3%6.4%655
2025-11-2987%7.1%253
2025-12-0683.2%10%369
2025-12-1384.8%8.8%833
2025-12-2069.6%13%23
2025-12-2786%8.6%93
2026-01-0386.7%4.7%301
2026-01-1075%0%8
2026-01-17100%0%2

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm4.4 per 1,000 · 23
Personal Attacks 15Group Hate 7Sexual Content 3Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse1.9 per 1,000 · 10
Disability 3Race 5Gender 2
Explicit Language7.3 per 1,000 · 38
Explicit Words 32Explicit Acronym 4Violent Language 2
College Sports2.3 per 1,000 · 12
Band 4Transfer Portal 3NIL 4Recruiting 1
Off-Field Storylines8.2 per 1,000 · 43
Injuries 12Broadcast & Media 20Officiating 5Politics & Activism 5Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting1.7 per 1,000 · 9
Gambling 9
Team & Front Office90.5 per 1,000 · 474
Opponent Respect 50Coaching 79Opponent Hostility 331Stadium Experience 7Crowd & Attendance 10

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

16th percentile
38 explicit comments7.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words32
  • Explicit Acronym4
  • Violent Language2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 86th of 100 nationally, the 16th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 6.348.8 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Oct 18)WWWWWWWLLWWWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300W 52–7 vs VMI
2025-09-060W 38–24 vs UAB
2025-09-130W 42–23 at Tulsa
2025-09-200No game
2025-09-2714.4W 21–13 vs Rice
2025-10-0420.3W 34–31 vs Air Force
2025-10-114W 32–31 at Temple
2025-10-1848.8No game
2025-10-250W 42–32 vs Florida Atlantic
2025-11-0110.5L 17–31 at North Texas
2025-11-080L 10–49 at Notre Dame
2025-11-158W 41–38 vs South Florida
2025-11-223.1W 28–17 at Memphis
2025-11-294No game
2025-12-062.7No game
2025-12-132.4W 17–16 vs Army
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-2743W 35–13 vs Cincinnati
2026-01-036.6No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 48.8 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Oct 18)) against a season average of 6.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks15
  • Group Hate7
  • Sexual Content3
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Race5
  • Disability3
  • Gender2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

GO NAVY!!!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸⚓️⚓️⚓️⚓️🍺🍺🍺🍺🏉🏉🏉🏉

positiveFacebook

True college athletes in the era of NIL

positiveNILFacebook

yes with the same results, my brother played for Navy in the early 90's and said the ND players tried to hurt them bad enough to get them out of the game---real sportsmanship there, esp when Navy was outmanned

negativeOpponent HostilityFacebook

Great game Navy!!! -AAC Champs!?!? Sorry for the loss in a couple weeks! Go Army, BEAT navy!!!!

mixedOpponent HostilityFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.