Temple

Owls · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
738.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
1,915
2025–26 season
Positive share
73.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
16.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Temple fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Temple Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive73.9%1,415
Neutral9.2%176
Negative15.9%304
Mixed1%20
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 20Low: −100% · week of Jan 17Aug 30: W 42–10 at UMassWSep 6: W 55–7 vs HowardWSep 13: L 3–42 vs OklahomaLSep 20: L 24–45 at Georgia TechLOct 4: W 27–21 vs UTSAWOct 11: L 31–32 vs NavyLOct 18: W 49–14 at CharlotteWOct 25: W 38–37 (OT) at TulsaWNov 1: L 14–45 vs East CarolinaLNov 8: L 13–14 at ArmyLNov 22: L 13–37 vs TulaneLNov 28: L 25–52 at North TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+78%60373No game
2025-08-30+83%17312195W 42–10 at UMass
2025-09-06+76%998119W 55–7 vs Howard
2025-09-13+36%6125100L 3–42 vs Oklahoma
2025-09-20+66%671185L 24–45 at Georgia Tech
2025-09-27+89%31035No game
2025-10-04+73%13212164W 27–21 vs UTSA
2025-10-11+39%582292L 31–32 vs Navy
2025-10-18+74%18621224W 49–14 at Charlotte
2025-10-25+76%20121236W 38–37 (OT) at Tulsa
2025-11-01+58%8520113L 14–45 vs East Carolina
2025-11-08+69%32342L 13–14 at Army
2025-11-15+85%34139No game
2025-11-22+47%7022102L 13–37 vs Tulane; L 25–52 at North Texas
2025-11-29+58%491165No game
2025-12-06−33%45106186No game
2025-12-13+33%103No game
2025-12-20+100%707No game
2025-12-27+100%202No game
2026-01-03+50%15422No game
2026-01-10+60%7110No game
2026-01-17−100%011No game
Fan mood fell 160 points the week of Jan 17.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: W 42–10 at UMassWSep 6: W 55–7 vs HowardWSep 13: L 3–42 vs OklahomaLSep 20: L 24–45 at Georgia TechLOct 4: W 27–21 vs UTSAWOct 11: L 31–32 vs NavyLOct 18: W 49–14 at CharlotteWOct 25: W 38–37 (OT) at TulsaWNov 1: L 14–45 vs East CarolinaLNov 8: L 13–14 at ArmyLNov 22: L 13–37 vs TulaneLNov 28: L 25–52 at North TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2382.2%4.1%73
2025-08-3088.7%6.2%195
2025-09-0683.2%6.7%119
2025-09-1361%25%100
2025-09-2078.8%12.9%85
2025-09-2788.6%0%35
2025-10-0480.5%7.3%164
2025-10-1163%23.9%92
2025-10-1883%9.4%224
2025-10-2585.2%8.9%236
2025-11-0175.2%17.7%113
2025-11-0876.2%7.1%42
2025-11-1587.2%2.6%39
2025-11-2268.6%21.6%102
2025-11-2975.4%16.9%65
2025-12-0624.2%57%186
2025-12-1333.3%0%3
2025-12-20100%0%7
2025-12-27100%0%2
2026-01-0368.2%18.2%22
2026-01-1070%10%10
2026-01-170%100%1

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm13.1 per 1,000 · 25
Personal Attacks 24Group Hate 1Harm Wish 2
Identity-Based Abuse3.7 per 1,000 · 7
Age 1Physical Appearance 6
Explicit Language7.3 per 1,000 · 14
Explicit Words 11Explicit Acronym 3
College Sports19.3 per 1,000 · 37
Recruiting 16Conference Realignment 5Transfer Portal 6Student Section 6NIL 5Band 1
Off-Field Storylines17.8 per 1,000 · 34
Broadcast & Media 27Injuries 3Officiating 4
Sports Betting4.7 per 1,000 · 9
Prop Bet 1Gambling 8
Team & Front Office101.3 per 1,000 · 194
Stadium Experience 16Coaching 123Crowd & Attendance 36Opponent Hostility 16Opponent Respect 3Athletic Department 1Front Office 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

14 explicit comments7.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words11
  • Explicit Acronym3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 16.750 per 1,000 · L 3–42 vs OklahomaWWLLWLWWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3010.3W 42–10 at UMass
2025-09-060W 55–7 vs Howard
2025-09-1350L 3–42 vs Oklahoma
2025-09-2011.8L 24–45 at Georgia Tech
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-0424.4W 27–21 vs UTSA
2025-10-1110.9L 31–32 vs Navy
2025-10-1822.3W 49–14 at Charlotte
2025-10-254.2W 38–37 (OT) at Tulsa
2025-11-018.8L 14–45 vs East Carolina
2025-11-080L 13–14 at Army
2025-11-150No game
2025-11-2239.2L 13–37 vs Tulane; L 25–52 at North Texas
2025-11-2930.8No game
2025-12-0632.3No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 50 per 1,000 comments (L 3–42 vs Oklahoma) against a season average of 16.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks24
  • Harm Wish2
  • Group Hate1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance6
  • Age1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

I’ll see you there. Where’s the tailgate at? Lol

positiveStadium ExperienceFacebook

You have a home and home with Rutgers. Two for the knights

positiveFacebook

We stopped at tieing the game at 14 and disappeared. ECU's total yardage was mega!

negativeFacebook

Just wait until the transfer portal opens - Congrats Temple Football 🏈

mixedTransfer PortalFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.