North Dakota State

Bison · 12–1 in 2025–26

Compare North Dakota State with…
Fan Score
737.6
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,131
2025–26 season
Positive share
73.8%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
19.4
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects North Dakota State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 12th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 82nd percentile · Harm: 28th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • North Dakota State Harm: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • North Dakota State Explicit Language: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State College Sports: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Off-Field Storylines: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • North Dakota State Team & Front Office: 12th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive73.8%3,047
Neutral9.3%386
Negative15.9%657
Mixed1%41

Signature subtags

What North Dakota State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
3.2×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 3.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.1 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
2.2×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

25.7 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.5×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +89% · W 48–16 vs Northern IowaLow: −33% · week of Jan 10Aug 30: W 38–0 at The CitadelWSep 6: W 59–3 at Tennessee StWSep 13: W 41–14 vs SE MissouriWSep 27: W 51–13 vs South DakotaWOct 4: W 33–16 at Illinois StWOct 11: W 45–17 vs S IllinoisWOct 18: W 38–7 at Indiana StWOct 25: W 38–7 at S Dakota StWNov 1: W 38–30 vs Youngstown StWNov 8: W 15–10 at North DakotaWNov 15: W 48–16 vs Northern IowaWNov 22: W 62–7 vs St Thomas (MN)WDec 6: L 28–29 vs Illinois StLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+29%401973No game
2025-08-30+70%909115W 38–0 at The Citadel
2025-09-06+44%7721126W 59–3 at Tennessee St
2025-09-13+39%11843194W 41–14 vs SE Missouri
2025-09-20+53%21334No game
2025-09-27+78%1308156W 51–13 vs South Dakota
2025-10-04+57%10722150W 33–16 at Illinois St
2025-10-11+67%20632260W 45–17 vs S Illinois
2025-10-18+78%944115W 38–7 at Indiana St
2025-10-25+67%27046335W 38–7 at S Dakota St
2025-11-01+72%14715184W 38–30 vs Youngstown St
2025-11-08+50%26278366W 15–10 at North Dakota
2025-11-15+89%2238242W 48–16 vs Northern Iowa
2025-11-22+61%34063455W 62–7 vs St Thomas (MN)
2025-11-29+71%37650460No game
2025-12-06+6%218189466L 28–29 vs Illinois St
2025-12-13+66%11220139No game
2025-12-20+83%41346No game
2025-12-27+68%30537No game
2026-01-03+73%72888No game
2026-01-10−33%3712No game
2026-01-17+85%70478No game
Fan mood jumped 118 points the week of Jan 17.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%46%92%Aug 30: W 38–0 at The CitadelWSep 6: W 59–3 at Tennessee StWSep 13: W 41–14 vs SE MissouriWSep 27: W 51–13 vs South DakotaWOct 4: W 33–16 at Illinois StWOct 11: W 45–17 vs S IllinoisWOct 18: W 38–7 at Indiana StWOct 25: W 38–7 at S Dakota StWNov 1: W 38–30 vs Youngstown StWNov 8: W 15–10 at North DakotaWNov 15: W 48–16 vs Northern IowaWNov 22: W 62–7 vs St Thomas (MN)WDec 6: L 28–29 vs Illinois StLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2354.8%26%73
2025-08-3078.3%7.8%115
2025-09-0661.1%16.7%126
2025-09-1360.8%22.2%194
2025-09-2061.8%8.8%34
2025-09-2783.3%5.1%156
2025-10-0471.3%14.7%150
2025-10-1179.2%12.3%260
2025-10-1881.7%3.5%115
2025-10-2580.6%13.7%335
2025-11-0179.9%8.2%184
2025-11-0871.6%21.3%366
2025-11-1592.1%3.3%242
2025-11-2274.7%13.8%455
2025-11-2981.7%10.9%460
2025-12-0646.8%40.6%466
2025-12-1380.6%14.4%139
2025-12-2089.1%6.5%46
2025-12-2781.1%13.5%37
2026-01-0381.8%9.1%88
2026-01-1025%58.3%12
2026-01-1789.7%5.1%78

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm16.2 per 1,000 · 67
Personal Attacks 60Sexual Content 2Group Hate 5Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse3.1 per 1,000 · 13
Gender 6Disability 1Physical Appearance 2Age 1Race 3
Explicit Language13.3 per 1,000 · 55
Explicit Words 49Explicit Acronym 7
College Sports11.9 per 1,000 · 49
Recruiting 14Conference Realignment 25Band 2NIL 6Student Section 2Transfer Portal 3
Off-Field Storylines38.2 per 1,000 · 158
Broadcast & Media 106Politics & Activism 1Injuries 16Officiating 36
Sports Betting0 per 1,000 · 0
Team & Front Office83.8 per 1,000 · 346
Opponent Hostility 47Stadium Experience 30Crowd & Attendance 31Opponent Respect 16Coaching 223Front Office 3Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

35th percentile
55 explicit comments13.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words49
  • Explicit Acronym7

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 13.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 66th of 100 nationally, the 35th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 19.4416.7 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 10)WWWWWWWWWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2313.7No game
2025-08-300W 38–0 at The Citadel
2025-09-067.9W 59–3 at Tennessee St
2025-09-1320.6W 41–14 vs SE Missouri
2025-09-2029.4No game
2025-09-276.4W 51–13 vs South Dakota
2025-10-0420W 33–16 at Illinois St
2025-10-1142.3W 45–17 vs S Illinois
2025-10-188.7W 38–7 at Indiana St
2025-10-2511.9W 38–7 at S Dakota St
2025-11-010W 38–30 vs Youngstown St
2025-11-0813.7W 15–10 at North Dakota
2025-11-154.1W 48–16 vs Northern Iowa
2025-11-2228.6W 62–7 vs St Thomas (MN)
2025-11-298.7No game
2025-12-0627.9L 28–29 vs Illinois St
2025-12-1343.2No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-27108.1No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-10416.7No game
2026-01-1725.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 416.7 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 10)) against a season average of 19.4 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks60
  • Group Hate5
  • Sexual Content2
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender6
  • Race3
  • Physical Appearance2
  • Disability1
  • Age1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Amazing leaders, extraordinary team!

positiveFacebook

They should name the weight room after him.

positiveFacebook

Please get us out of this division. We don’t belong w these programs. :(

negativeFacebook

Happy for him but I hate seeing the Packers win🤣

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.