Coastal Carolina

Chanticleers · 6–7 in 2025–26

Compare Coastal Carolina with…
Fan Score
710.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,398
2025–26 season
Positive share
71%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
17.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Coastal Carolina fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 8th percentile · Team & Front Office: 80th percentile · Harm: 24th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Coastal Carolina Harm: 24th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Coastal Carolina Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Coastal Carolina Explicit Language: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Coastal Carolina College Sports: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Coastal Carolina Off-Field Storylines: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Coastal Carolina Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Coastal Carolina Team & Front Office: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive71%3,124
Neutral9%398
Negative18.7%823
Mixed1.2%53

Signature subtags

What Coastal Carolina fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
4.1×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 4.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

39.8 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
3.9×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 3.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

19.3 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.7×

Mentioned Recruiting at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 10Low: −7% · L 0–38 vs East CarolinaAug 30: L 7–48 at VirginiaLSep 6: W 13–0 vs Charleston SoWSep 13: L 0–38 vs East CarolinaLSep 20: W 38–20 at South AlabamaWOct 4: L 7–47 at Old DominionLOct 11: W 23–8 vs UL MonroeWOct 18: W 45–37 at Appalachian StateWOct 30: W 44–27 vs MarshallWNov 8: W 40–27 vs Georgia StateWNov 15: L 40–45 at Georgia SouthernLNov 22: L 7–51 at South CarolinaLNov 29: L 10–59 vs James MadisonLDec 30: L 14–23 vs Louisiana TechLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+68%14616191No game
2025-08-30+29%217112358L 7–48 at Virginia
2025-09-06+38%25199402W 13–0 vs Charleston So
2025-09-13−7%96114241L 0–38 vs East Carolina
2025-09-20+82%16011182W 38–20 at South Alabama
2025-09-27+95%19020No game
2025-10-04−5%90102221L 7–47 at Old Dominion
2025-10-11+75%20525240W 23–8 vs UL Monroe
2025-10-18+75%26331310W 45–37 at Appalachian State
2025-10-25+52%15635231W 44–27 vs Marshall
2025-11-01+74%45258No game
2025-11-08+77%29625352W 40–27 vs Georgia State
2025-11-15+52%13033185L 40–45 at Georgia Southern
2025-11-22+37%19578313L 7–51 at South Carolina
2025-11-29+36%9641151L 10–59 vs James Madison
2025-12-06+56%14333195No game
2025-12-13+84%32116362No game
2025-12-20+96%26027No game
2025-12-27+58%23249315L 14–23 vs Louisiana Tech
2026-01-03+83%34140No game
2026-01-10+100%101No game
2026-01-17+67%203No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 38 to East Carolina, gaining 102 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: L 7–48 at VirginiaLSep 6: W 13–0 vs Charleston SoWSep 13: L 0–38 vs East CarolinaLSep 20: W 38–20 at South AlabamaWOct 4: L 7–47 at Old DominionLOct 11: W 23–8 vs UL MonroeWOct 18: W 45–37 at Appalachian StateWOct 30: W 44–27 vs MarshallWNov 8: W 40–27 vs Georgia StateWNov 15: L 40–45 at Georgia SouthernLNov 22: L 7–51 at South CarolinaLNov 29: L 10–59 vs James MadisonLDec 30: L 14–23 vs Louisiana TechLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2376.4%8.4%191
2025-08-3060.6%31.3%358
2025-09-0662.4%24.6%402
2025-09-1339.8%47.3%241
2025-09-2087.9%6%182
2025-09-2795%0%20
2025-10-0440.7%46.2%221
2025-10-1185.4%10.4%240
2025-10-1884.8%10%310
2025-10-2567.5%15.2%231
2025-11-0177.6%3.4%58
2025-11-0884.1%7.1%352
2025-11-1570.3%17.8%185
2025-11-2262.3%24.9%313
2025-11-2963.6%27.2%151
2025-12-0673.3%16.9%195
2025-12-1388.7%4.4%362
2025-12-2096.3%0%27
2025-12-2773.7%15.6%315
2026-01-0385%2.5%40
2026-01-10100%0%1
2026-01-1766.7%0%3

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm14.8 per 1,000 · 65
Sexual Content 4Personal Attacks 57Group Hate 3Violent Threat 1Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse2.7 per 1,000 · 12
Disability 3Gender 4Physical Appearance 3Race 3
Explicit Language15.7 per 1,000 · 69
Explicit Words 61Explicit Acronym 10Explicit Emoji 1Violent Language 2
College Sports16.6 per 1,000 · 73
Recruiting 35Student Section 10Band 5NIL 6Transfer Portal 18Conference Realignment 2
Off-Field Storylines14.1 per 1,000 · 62
Injuries 14Officiating 7Broadcast & Media 37Politics & Activism 4
Sports Betting2.5 per 1,000 · 11
Gambling 9Moneyline 1Parlay 1
Team & Front Office168.9 per 1,000 · 743
Coaching 394Crowd & Attendance 175Stadium Experience 85Opponent Hostility 62Opponent Respect 29Front Office 5Athletic Department 4

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

41st percentile
69 explicit comments15.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words61
  • Explicit Acronym10
  • Violent Language2
  • Explicit Emoji1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 15.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 60th of 100 nationally, the 41st percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 17.550.3 per 1,000 · L 7–48 at VirginiaLWLWLWWWWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3050.3L 7–48 at Virginia
2025-09-0619.9W 13–0 vs Charleston So
2025-09-1341.5L 0–38 vs East Carolina
2025-09-200W 38–20 at South Alabama
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-0422.6L 7–47 at Old Dominion
2025-10-114.2W 23–8 vs UL Monroe
2025-10-1841.9W 45–37 at Appalachian State
2025-10-2521.6W 44–27 vs Marshall
2025-11-010No game
2025-11-088.5W 40–27 vs Georgia State
2025-11-150L 40–45 at Georgia Southern
2025-11-2216L 7–51 at South Carolina
2025-11-296.6L 10–59 vs James Madison
2025-12-0610.3No game
2025-12-1311No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-276.3L 14–23 vs Louisiana Tech
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 50.3 per 1,000 comments (L 7–48 at Virginia) against a season average of 17.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks57
  • Sexual Content4
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish1
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender4
  • Disability3
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Race3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Just told my wife I have some eligibility left....at 75 lol. She told me to jump right on it. I just wish she hadn't been looking for my life insurance paperwork lol.

positiveFacebook

Saturdays are for Football.

positiveFacebook

I’ll go back w Beck is gone!!

negativeCoachingFacebook

Chants up!!!! Stop running it up the middle

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.