Michigan State

Spartans · 4–8 in 2025–26

Compare Michigan State with…
Fan Score
457.8
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
20,528
2025–26 season
Positive share
45.8%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
63.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Michigan State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 95th percentile · Team & Front Office: 91st percentile · Explicit Language: 89th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Michigan State Harm: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State Identity-Based Abuse: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State Explicit Language: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State College Sports: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State Off-Field Storylines: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan State Team & Front Office: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive45.8%9,398
Neutral7.9%1,628
Negative44.3%9,101
Mixed2%401

Signature subtags

What Michigan State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
4.5×

Mentioned Player Conduct at 4.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.7 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.2×

Mentioned Athletic Department at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.1 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.7×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

150.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +82% · week of Sep 27Low: −51% · L 13–38 vs UCLAAug 29: W 23–6 vs Western MichiganWSep 6: W 42–40 (2OT) vs Boston CollegeWSep 13: W 41–24 vs Youngstown StWSep 20: L 31–45 at USCLOct 4: L 27–38 at NebraskaLOct 11: L 13–38 vs UCLALOct 18: L 13–38 at IndianaLOct 25: L 20–31 vs MichiganLNov 1: L 20–23 (OT) at MinnesotaLNov 15: L 10–28 vs Penn StateLNov 22: L 17–20 at IowaLNov 29: W 38–28 vs MarylandWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+56%478111653W 23–6 vs Western Michigan
2025-08-30+17%522353972No game
2025-09-06+17%8215551,597W 42–40 (2OT) vs Boston College
2025-09-13+38%630268964W 41–24 vs Youngstown St
2025-09-20+9%4994061,013L 31–45 at USC
2025-09-27+82%18315205No game
2025-10-04−23%3806311,108L 27–38 at Nebraska
2025-10-11−51%3161,1111,563L 13–38 vs UCLA
2025-10-18−17%5508211,554L 13–38 at Indiana
2025-10-25−24%8191,3942,405L 20–31 vs Michigan
2025-11-01−2%168175383L 20–23 (OT) at Minnesota
2025-11-08+15%11180203No game
2025-11-15−24%329567985L 10–28 vs Penn State
2025-11-22−28%129246411L 17–20 at Iowa
2025-11-29+11%1,8891,4663,760W 38–28 vs Maryland
2025-12-06+27%310166534No game
2025-12-13+32%254119421No game
2025-12-20+67%9015112No game
2025-12-27+15%177125342No game
2026-01-03+30%237119396No game
2026-01-10+21%433275770No game
2026-01-17−6%7383177No game
Fan mood fell 105 points the week they lost by 11 at Nebraska.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%45%89%Aug 29: W 23–6 vs Western MichiganWSep 6: W 42–40 (2OT) vs Boston CollegeWSep 13: W 41–24 vs Youngstown StWSep 20: L 31–45 at USCLOct 4: L 27–38 at NebraskaLOct 11: L 13–38 vs UCLALOct 18: L 13–38 at IndianaLOct 25: L 20–31 vs MichiganLNov 1: L 20–23 (OT) at MinnesotaLNov 15: L 10–28 vs Penn StateLNov 22: L 17–20 at IowaLNov 29: W 38–28 vs MarylandWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2373.2%17%653
2025-08-3053.7%36.3%972
2025-09-0651.4%34.8%1,597
2025-09-1365.4%27.8%964
2025-09-2049.3%40.1%1,013
2025-09-2789.3%7.3%205
2025-10-0434.3%56.9%1,108
2025-10-1120.2%71.1%1,563
2025-10-1835.4%52.8%1,554
2025-10-2534.1%58%2,405
2025-11-0143.9%45.7%383
2025-11-0854.7%39.4%203
2025-11-1533.4%57.6%985
2025-11-2231.4%59.9%411
2025-11-2950.2%39%3,760
2025-12-0658.1%31.1%534
2025-12-1360.3%28.3%421
2025-12-2080.4%13.4%112
2025-12-2751.8%36.5%342
2026-01-0359.8%30.1%396
2026-01-1056.2%35.7%770
2026-01-1741.2%46.9%177

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm53.8 per 1,000 · 1,104
Personal Attacks 1,043Sexual Content 48Group Hate 38Harm Wish 14Violent Threat 2
Identity-Based Abuse9.5 per 1,000 · 196
Disability 44Physical Appearance 62Age 23Gender 47Race 11LGBTQIA+ 15Religion 2
Explicit Language40.8 per 1,000 · 838
Explicit Words 722Explicit Acronym 122Explicit Emoji 9Violent Language 8
College Sports21.6 per 1,000 · 443
Transfer Portal 118Recruiting 162NIL 109Conference Realignment 48Band 18Student Section 18
Off-Field Storylines33.6 per 1,000 · 689
Broadcast & Media 251Injuries 108Politics & Activism 11Officiating 270Player Conduct 55
Sports Betting4.2 per 1,000 · 86
Gambling 78Moneyline 2Prop Bet 3Parlay 3
Team & Front Office202.1 per 1,000 · 4,148
Stadium Experience 61Opponent Hostility 727Crowd & Attendance 120Coaching 3,084Front Office 107Opponent Respect 119Athletic Department 22

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

89th percentile
838 explicit comments40.8 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words722
  • Explicit Acronym122
  • Explicit Emoji9
  • Violent Language8

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 40.8 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 12th of 100 nationally, the 89th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 63.3186.4 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWLLLLLLLLW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2338.3W 23–6 vs Western Michigan
2025-08-3037No game
2025-09-0630.1W 42–40 (2OT) vs Boston College
2025-09-1337.3W 41–24 vs Youngstown St
2025-09-2080.9L 31–45 at USC
2025-09-274.9No game
2025-10-0496.6L 27–38 at Nebraska
2025-10-1171L 13–38 vs UCLA
2025-10-1851.5L 13–38 at Indiana
2025-10-2574.8L 20–31 vs Michigan
2025-11-0147L 20–23 (OT) at Minnesota
2025-11-0873.9No game
2025-11-1560.9L 10–28 vs Penn State
2025-11-2260.8L 17–20 at Iowa
2025-11-2957.7W 38–28 vs Maryland
2025-12-0652.4No game
2025-12-13111.6No game
2025-12-2026.8No game
2025-12-2796.5No game
2026-01-0358.1No game
2026-01-10119.5No game
2026-01-17186.4No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 186.4 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 63.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks1,043
  • Sexual Content48
  • Group Hate38
  • Harm Wish14
  • Violent Threat2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance62
  • Gender47
  • Disability44
  • Age23
  • LGBTQIA+15
  • Race11
  • Religion2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Love my Michigan State Spartans…..Go Green….💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍

positiveFacebook

Work and Discipline. How can you not love this guy?

positiveFacebook

Very sad…always a Sparty but come on man

negativeFacebook

31-20!!!! You guys need to recruit better jerseys????

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.