Penn State

Nittany Lions · 7–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
424.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
57,708
2025–26 season
Positive share
42.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
46.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Penn State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 89th percentile · Harm: 76th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Penn State Harm: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Identity-Based Abuse: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Explicit Language: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State College Sports: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Sports Betting: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Team & Front Office: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive42.5%24,518
Neutral11.8%6,783
Negative44.3%25,556
Mixed1.5%851

Signature subtags

What Penn State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
1.8×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

158.6 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.5×

Mentioned Front Office at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

5.2 per 1,000 comments
Sports Betting
1.5×

Mentioned Moneyline at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

0.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +71% · week of Jan 10Low: −55% · L 37–42 at UCLAAug 30: W 46–11 vs NevadaWSep 6: W 34–0 vs FIUWSep 13: W 52–6 vs VillanovaWSep 27: L 24–30 (2OT) vs OregonLOct 4: L 37–42 at UCLALOct 11: L 21–22 vs NorthwesternLOct 18: L 24–25 at IowaLNov 1: L 14–38 at Ohio StateLNov 8: L 24–27 vs IndianaLNov 15: W 28–10 at Michigan StateWNov 22: W 37–10 vs NebraskaWNov 29: W 40–36 at RutgersWDec 27: W 22–10 vs ClemsonWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+28%537264959No game
2025-08-30+1%6686551,628W 46–11 vs Nevada
2025-09-06−25%7921,4322,576W 34–0 vs FIU
2025-09-13−22%4377321,366W 52–6 vs Villanova
2025-09-20+18%6333261,709No game
2025-09-27−46%1,2643,9675,893L 24–30 (2OT) vs Oregon
2025-10-04−55%1,1985,1127,134L 37–42 at UCLA
2025-10-11−34%1,4983,3395,411L 21–22 vs Northwestern
2025-10-18−20%1,0431,6623,114L 24–25 at Iowa
2025-10-25+11%5294141,047No game
2025-11-01−9%8411,0412,139L 14–38 at Ohio State
2025-11-08−14%9191,3032,794L 24–27 vs Indiana
2025-11-15+40%1,8026972,734W 28–10 at Michigan State
2025-11-22+58%2,0224502,720W 37–10 vs Nebraska
2025-11-29+3%1,2641,1862,777W 40–36 at Rutgers
2025-12-06+35%3,7101,5686,139No game
2025-12-13+56%1,0622451,459No game
2025-12-20+50%662180969No game
2025-12-27+48%2,6738053,852W 22–10 vs Clemson
2026-01-03+37%8632147No game
2026-01-10+71%42648532No game
2026-01-17+58%45298609No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 5 at UCLA, gaining 66 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%40%80%Aug 30: W 46–11 vs NevadaWSep 6: W 34–0 vs FIUWSep 13: W 52–6 vs VillanovaWSep 27: L 24–30 (2OT) vs OregonLOct 4: L 37–42 at UCLALOct 11: L 21–22 vs NorthwesternLOct 18: L 24–25 at IowaLNov 1: L 14–38 at Ohio StateLNov 8: L 24–27 vs IndianaLNov 15: W 28–10 at Michigan StateWNov 22: W 37–10 vs NebraskaWNov 29: W 40–36 at RutgersWDec 27: W 22–10 vs ClemsonWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2356%27.5%959
2025-08-3041%40.2%1,628
2025-09-0630.7%55.6%2,576
2025-09-1332%53.6%1,366
2025-09-2037%19.1%1,709
2025-09-2721.4%67.3%5,893
2025-10-0416.8%71.7%7,134
2025-10-1127.7%61.7%5,411
2025-10-1833.5%53.4%3,114
2025-10-2550.5%39.5%1,047
2025-11-0139.3%48.7%2,139
2025-11-0832.9%46.6%2,794
2025-11-1565.9%25.5%2,734
2025-11-2274.3%16.5%2,720
2025-11-2945.5%42.7%2,777
2025-12-0660.4%25.5%6,139
2025-12-1372.8%16.8%1,459
2025-12-2068.3%18.6%969
2025-12-2769.4%20.9%3,852
2026-01-0358.5%21.8%147
2026-01-1080.1%9%532
2026-01-1774.2%16.1%609

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments 2 times this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm40 per 1,000 · 2,310
Group Hate 61Harm Wish 28Personal Attacks 2,207Sexual Content 45Violent Threat 4
Identity-Based Abuse6.5 per 1,000 · 373
Disability 86Age 37Gender 73LGBTQIA+ 23Physical Appearance 141Race 17Religion 4
Explicit Language11.8 per 1,000 · 679
Explicit Acronym 303Explicit Emoji 28Explicit Words 346Usual Suspects 1Violent Language 11
College Sports15.1 per 1,000 · 869
Band 64Conference Realignment 21NIL 168Recruiting 399Student Section 56Transfer Portal 194
Off-Field Storylines21.2 per 1,000 · 1,224
Broadcast & Media 595Injuries 179Officiating 424Player Conduct 19Politics & Activism 15
Sports Betting4 per 1,000 · 233
Gambling 191Moneyline 17Parlay 3Prop Bet 22
Team & Front Office199.1 per 1,000 · 11,491
Coaching 9,152Crowd & Attendance 647Front Office 301Opponent Hostility 793Opponent Respect 380Athletic Department 41Stadium Experience 362

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

31st percentile
679 explicit comments11.8 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words346
  • Explicit Acronym303
  • Explicit Emoji28
  • Violent Language11
  • Usual Suspects1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 11.8 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 70th of 100 nationally, the 31st percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 46.586.6 per 1,000 · W 46–11 vs NevadaWWWLLLLLLWWWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2365.7No game
2025-08-3086.6W 46–11 vs Nevada
2025-09-0658.2W 34–0 vs FIU
2025-09-1346.9W 52–6 vs Villanova
2025-09-2029.3No game
2025-09-2761.8L 24–30 (2OT) vs Oregon
2025-10-0458.6L 37–42 at UCLA
2025-10-1152.9L 21–22 vs Northwestern
2025-10-1841.4L 24–25 at Iowa
2025-10-2529.6No game
2025-11-0135.1L 14–38 at Ohio State
2025-11-0841.5L 24–27 vs Indiana
2025-11-1537.7W 28–10 at Michigan State
2025-11-2227.9W 37–10 vs Nebraska
2025-11-2937.1W 40–36 at Rutgers
2025-12-0644.8No game
2025-12-1330.2No game
2025-12-2033No game
2025-12-2729.3W 22–10 vs Clemson
2026-01-0354.4No game
2026-01-1018.8No game
2026-01-1752.5No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 86.6 per 1,000 comments (W 46–11 vs Nevada) against a season average of 46.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2,207
  • Group Hate61
  • Sexual Content45
  • Harm Wish28
  • Violent Threat4
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance141
  • Disability86
  • Gender73
  • Age37
  • LGBTQIA+23
  • Race17
  • Religion4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

That's our Blue Ban. We Are!

positiveBandFacebook

My favorite player next to Lavar. Ki-jana and that 94’ team is the reason i became a life long penn state football fan! Congrats Ki! So happy for you!

positiveFacebook

Just sucks that the season is over after only 5 games.

negativeFacebook

DBs couldn’t cover all year. Not sure why they brought this DC in. The pass defense has sucked all year. But hats off to the players. Great game

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.