Illinois

Fighting Illini · 9–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
532.6
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
15,179
2025–26 season
Positive share
53.3%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
32.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Illinois fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 80th percentile · Sports Betting: 76th percentile · Team & Front Office: 24th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Illinois Harm: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Identity-Based Abuse: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Explicit Language: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois College Sports: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Off-Field Storylines: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Team & Front Office: 24th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive53.3%8,084
Neutral12.2%1,845
Negative32.7%4,964
Mixed1.9%286

Signature subtags

What Illinois fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
5.6×

Mentioned Athletic Department at 5.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.8 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
2.9×

Mentioned Student Section at 2.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.7×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

13 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +76% · week of Dec 13Low: −51% · L 10–63 at IndianaAug 29: W 52–3 vs W IllinoisWSep 6: W 45–19 at DukeWSep 13: W 38–0 vs Western MichiganWSep 20: L 10–63 at IndianaLSep 27: W 34–32 vs USCWOct 4: W 43–27 at PurdueWOct 11: L 16–34 vs Ohio StateLOct 25: L 25–42 at WashingtonLNov 1: W 35–13 vs RutgersWNov 15: W 24–6 vs MarylandWNov 22: L 10–27 at WisconsinLNov 29: W 20–13 vs NorthwesternWDec 30: W 30–28 vs TennesseeWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+51%13232198W 52–3 vs W Illinois
2025-08-30+43%382113629No game
2025-09-06+42%6882441,061W 45–19 at Duke
2025-09-13+18%348226684W 38–0 vs Western Michigan
2025-09-20−51%3551,3782,008L 10–63 at Indiana
2025-09-27+31%7603591,275W 34–32 vs USC
2025-10-04+41%604211957W 43–27 at Purdue
2025-10-11−17%274409806L 16–34 vs Ohio State
2025-10-18−2%125131303No game
2025-10-25−38%121304480L 25–42 at Washington
2025-11-01+42%25391390W 35–13 vs Rutgers
2025-11-08+50%13430207No game
2025-11-15+33%308138516W 24–6 vs Maryland
2025-11-22−36%208480746L 10–27 at Wisconsin
2025-11-29+48%8082221,228W 20–13 vs Northwestern
2025-12-06+48%21950349No game
2025-12-13+76%15014179No game
2025-12-20+75%1019123No game
2025-12-27+68%1,5542371,943W 30–28 vs Tennessee
2026-01-03+44%29994468No game
2026-01-10+13%199138456No game
2026-01-17+5%6254173No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 17 at Wisconsin, gaining 112 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%42%84%Aug 29: W 52–3 vs W IllinoisWSep 6: W 45–19 at DukeWSep 13: W 38–0 vs Western MichiganWSep 20: L 10–63 at IndianaLSep 27: W 34–32 vs USCWOct 4: W 43–27 at PurdueWOct 11: L 16–34 vs Ohio StateLOct 25: L 25–42 at WashingtonLNov 1: W 35–13 vs RutgersWNov 15: W 24–6 vs MarylandWNov 22: L 10–27 at WisconsinLNov 29: W 20–13 vs NorthwesternWDec 30: W 30–28 vs TennesseeWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2366.7%16.2%198
2025-08-3060.7%18%629
2025-09-0664.8%23%1,061
2025-09-1350.9%33%684
2025-09-2017.7%68.6%2,008
2025-09-2759.6%28.2%1,275
2025-10-0463.1%22%957
2025-10-1134%50.7%806
2025-10-1841.3%43.2%303
2025-10-2525.2%63.3%480
2025-11-0164.9%23.3%390
2025-11-0864.7%14.5%207
2025-11-1559.7%26.7%516
2025-11-2227.9%64.3%746
2025-11-2965.8%18.1%1,228
2025-12-0662.8%14.3%349
2025-12-1383.8%7.8%179
2025-12-2082.1%7.3%123
2025-12-2780%12.2%1,943
2026-01-0363.9%20.1%468
2026-01-1043.6%30.3%456
2026-01-1735.8%31.2%173

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm27 per 1,000 · 410
Personal Attacks 394Sexual Content 10Group Hate 12Violent Threat 1Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse5.9 per 1,000 · 89
Physical Appearance 40Age 9Gender 24Disability 15LGBTQIA+ 5Race 1Religion 1
Explicit Language26.7 per 1,000 · 405
Explicit Words 349Explicit Acronym 53Violent Language 8Explicit Emoji 12
College Sports17.5 per 1,000 · 265
Recruiting 91Band 38NIL 55Student Section 30Transfer Portal 55Conference Realignment 6
Off-Field Storylines36.4 per 1,000 · 553
Injuries 80Officiating 208Broadcast & Media 266Politics & Activism 6
Sports Betting4.1 per 1,000 · 62
Gambling 54Prop Bet 5Parlay 2Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office98.2 per 1,000 · 1,491
Crowd & Attendance 215Stadium Experience 197Opponent Hostility 248Athletic Department 42Opponent Respect 71Coaching 726Front Office 27

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

62nd percentile
405 explicit comments26.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words349
  • Explicit Acronym53
  • Explicit Emoji12
  • Violent Language8

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 26.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 39th of 100 nationally, the 62nd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 32.978.2 per 1,000 · L 16–34 vs Ohio StateWWWLWWLLWWLWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2310.1W 52–3 vs W Illinois
2025-08-3028.6No game
2025-09-0619.8W 45–19 at Duke
2025-09-1352.6W 38–0 vs Western Michigan
2025-09-2036.4L 10–63 at Indiana
2025-09-2721.2W 34–32 vs USC
2025-10-0420.9W 43–27 at Purdue
2025-10-1178.2L 16–34 vs Ohio State
2025-10-1872.6No game
2025-10-2537.5L 25–42 at Washington
2025-11-0176.9W 35–13 vs Rutgers
2025-11-0814.5No game
2025-11-1525.2W 24–6 vs Maryland
2025-11-2242.9L 10–27 at Wisconsin
2025-11-2923.6W 20–13 vs Northwestern
2025-12-0634.4No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-2032.5No game
2025-12-2721.1W 30–28 vs Tennessee
2026-01-0329.9No game
2026-01-1032.9No game
2026-01-1734.7No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 78.2 per 1,000 comments (L 16–34 vs Ohio State) against a season average of 32.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks394
  • Group Hate12
  • Sexual Content10
  • Harm Wish1
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance40
  • Gender24
  • Disability15
  • Age9
  • LGBTQIA+5
  • Race1
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Amazing. Gotta protect those “investments.” I’m curious to know about the investments in the sports psychology mental side of protecting/growing/motivating the athletes.

positiveFacebook

Welcome TO.ILLIN NATION. Darrell..👍🧡💙🧡🏈🏈🏈

positiveFacebook

Sorry, never going to use the paid-for name.

negativeFacebook

You might win all the other games but this week y'all's taking a loss go buckeyes 💪💪 but I'll root for you all the rest of the season

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.