Sacramento State

Hornets · 7–5 in 2025–26

Compare Sacramento State with…
Fan Score
665.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
706
2025–26 season
Positive share
66.6%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
31.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Sacramento State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Sacramento State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Sacramento State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive66.6%470
Neutral8.6%61
Negative22.9%162
Mixed1.8%13
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · W 55–27 at Weber StLow: −77% · week of Dec 6Aug 30: L 3–20 at S Dakota StLSep 6: L 17–20 at NevadaLSep 13: W 49–28 vs MercyhurstWSep 20: W 45–16 vs C ArkansasWSep 27: L 24–32 vs Cal PolyLOct 11: W 55–27 at Weber StWOct 18: W 40–35 vs N ColoradoWOct 24: L 35–49 vs MontanaLNov 1: W 35–13 at E WashingtonWNov 8: W 52–24 at Portland StWNov 15: W 23–20 vs IdahoWNov 22: L 27–31 at UC DavisLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+78%23227No game
2025-08-30+60%16420L 3–20 at S Dakota St
2025-09-06−7%5614L 17–20 at Nevada
2025-09-13+75%43551W 49–28 vs Mercyhurst
2025-09-20+59%25632W 45–16 vs C Arkansas
2025-09-27−13%101324L 24–32 vs Cal Poly
2025-10-04+75%10112No game
2025-10-11+100%14014W 55–27 at Weber St
2025-10-18+45%271038W 40–35 vs N Colorado; L 35–49 vs Montana
2025-10-25−18%335093No game
2025-11-01+69%13216W 35–13 at E Washington
2025-11-08+73%18222W 52–24 at Portland St
2025-11-15+75%52365W 23–20 vs Idaho
2025-11-22+46%16426L 27–31 at UC Davis
2025-11-29−24%112037No game
2025-12-06−77%11113No game
2025-12-13+60%9116126No game
2025-12-20+82%35339No game
2025-12-27+0%001No game
2026-01-03No comments000No game
2026-01-10+67%719No game
2026-01-17+63%20327No game
Fan mood jumped 136 points the week of Dec 13.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: L 3–20 at S Dakota StLSep 6: L 17–20 at NevadaLSep 13: W 49–28 vs MercyhurstWSep 20: W 45–16 vs C ArkansasWSep 27: L 24–32 vs Cal PolyLOct 11: W 55–27 at Weber StWOct 18: W 40–35 vs N ColoradoWOct 24: L 35–49 vs MontanaLNov 1: W 35–13 at E WashingtonWNov 8: W 52–24 at Portland StWNov 15: W 23–20 vs IdahoWNov 22: L 27–31 at UC DavisLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2385.2%7.4%27
2025-08-3080%20%20
2025-09-0635.7%42.9%14
2025-09-1384.3%9.8%51
2025-09-2078.1%18.8%32
2025-09-2741.7%54.2%24
2025-10-0483.3%8.3%12
2025-10-11100%0%14
2025-10-1871.1%26.3%38
2025-10-2535.5%53.8%93
2025-11-0181.3%12.5%16
2025-11-0881.8%9.1%22
2025-11-1580%4.6%65
2025-11-2261.5%15.4%26
2025-11-2929.7%54.1%37
2025-12-067.7%84.6%13
2025-12-1372.2%12.7%126
2025-12-2089.7%7.7%39
2025-12-270%0%1
2026-01-030%0%0
2026-01-1077.8%11.1%9
2026-01-1774.1%11.1%27

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm29.7 per 1,000 · 21
Personal Attacks 19Sexual Content 1Group Hate 1
Identity-Based Abuse1.4 per 1,000 · 1
LGBTQIA+ 1
Explicit Language5.7 per 1,000 · 4
Explicit Acronym 4
College Sports26.9 per 1,000 · 19
NIL 3Transfer Portal 4Recruiting 10Conference Realignment 5Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines22.7 per 1,000 · 16
Broadcast & Media 10Injuries 1Officiating 5
Sports Betting0 per 1,000 · 0
Team & Front Office138.8 per 1,000 · 98
Coaching 79Opponent Hostility 12Front Office 1Crowd & Attendance 5Stadium Experience 1Opponent Respect 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

4 explicit comments5.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 5.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 31.2307.7 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)LLWWLWWLWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300L 3–20 at S Dakota St
2025-09-0671.4L 17–20 at Nevada
2025-09-1319.6W 49–28 vs Mercyhurst
2025-09-20156.3W 45–16 vs C Arkansas
2025-09-270L 24–32 vs Cal Poly
2025-10-040No game
2025-10-110W 55–27 at Weber St
2025-10-180W 40–35 vs N Colorado; L 35–49 vs Montana
2025-10-2586No game
2025-11-010W 35–13 at E Washington
2025-11-080W 52–24 at Portland St
2025-11-1515.4W 23–20 vs Idaho
2025-11-220L 27–31 at UC Davis
2025-11-290No game
2025-12-06307.7No game
2025-12-1315.9No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 307.7 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 31.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks19
  • Group Hate1
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • LGBTQIA+1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Let’s go Hornets 🐝. Hornets alumni here

positiveFacebook

Love seeing all these announcements about NorCal guys.

positiveFacebook

Maybe a little disciplinary practice to work on all them penalties. Thought I was watching a high school game 🤣 go griz

negativeFacebook

Good win. But a couple of SERIOUS coaching moments. Lateral on an INT? Catching a punted ball within the 5? Luckily, neither came back to hurt, but against stronger opponents, they will.

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.