Akron

Zips · 5–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
622.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
1,038
2025–26 season
Positive share
62.2%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
13.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Akron fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Akron Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive62.2%646
Neutral10.2%106
Negative27.1%281
Mixed0.5%5
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Nov 22Low: −39% · L 0–10 vs WyomingAug 28: L 0–10 vs WyomingLSep 6: L 0–68 at NebraskaLSep 13: L 28–31 at UABLSep 20: W 51–7 vs DuquesneWSep 27: L 3–45 at ToledoLOct 4: W 28–22 vs Central MichiganWOct 11: L 7–20 vs Miami (Ohio)LOct 18: L 28–42 at Ball StateLOct 25: W 24–16 at BuffaloWNov 4: W 44–10 vs UMassWNov 11: L 35–42 (OT) vs Kent StateLNov 18: W 19–16 at Bowling GreenWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23−39%2566106L 0–10 vs Wyoming
2025-08-30+7%131127No game
2025-09-06−23%3763115L 0–68 at Nebraska
2025-09-13+30%211133L 28–31 at UAB
2025-09-20+71%8910112W 51–7 vs Duquesne
2025-09-27−23%244069L 3–45 at Toledo
2025-10-04+68%69890W 28–22 vs Central Michigan
2025-10-11+33%18927L 7–20 vs Miami (Ohio)
2025-10-18+59%22332L 28–42 at Ball State
2025-10-25+77%68582W 24–16 at Buffalo
2025-11-01+75%62773W 44–10 vs UMass
2025-11-08+18%442983L 35–42 (OT) vs Kent State
2025-11-15+70%721286W 19–16 at Bowling Green
2025-11-22+100%202No game
2025-11-29+94%31033No game
2025-12-06+100%505No game
2025-12-13+100%202No game
2025-12-20+100%404No game
2025-12-27+50%416No game
2026-01-03+50%12318No game
2026-01-10+60%10115No game
2026-01-17+56%12218No game
Fan mood fell 94 points the week they lost by 42 at Toledo.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 28: L 0–10 vs WyomingLSep 6: L 0–68 at NebraskaLSep 13: L 28–31 at UABLSep 20: W 51–7 vs DuquesneWSep 27: L 3–45 at ToledoLOct 4: W 28–22 vs Central MichiganWOct 11: L 7–20 vs Miami (Ohio)LOct 18: L 28–42 at Ball StateLOct 25: W 24–16 at BuffaloWNov 4: W 44–10 vs UMassWNov 11: L 35–42 (OT) vs Kent StateLNov 18: W 19–16 at Bowling GreenWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2323.6%62.3%106
2025-08-3048.1%40.7%27
2025-09-0632.2%54.8%115
2025-09-1363.6%33.3%33
2025-09-2079.5%8.9%112
2025-09-2734.8%58%69
2025-10-0476.7%8.9%90
2025-10-1166.7%33.3%27
2025-10-1868.8%9.4%32
2025-10-2582.9%6.1%82
2025-11-0184.9%9.6%73
2025-11-0853%34.9%83
2025-11-1583.7%14%86
2025-11-22100%0%2
2025-11-2993.9%0%33
2025-12-06100%0%5
2025-12-13100%0%2
2025-12-20100%0%4
2025-12-2766.7%16.7%6
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%18
2026-01-1066.7%6.7%15
2026-01-1766.7%11.1%18

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm10.6 per 1,000 · 11
Personal Attacks 7Harm Wish 3Group Hate 1
Identity-Based Abuse2.9 per 1,000 · 3
Physical Appearance 1Disability 2
Explicit Language7.7 per 1,000 · 8
Violent Language 3Explicit Acronym 3Explicit Words 2
College Sports27.9 per 1,000 · 29
Band 4NIL 5Recruiting 12Conference Realignment 3Transfer Portal 8
Off-Field Storylines40.5 per 1,000 · 42
Injuries 4Broadcast & Media 33Player Conduct 1Officiating 4
Sports Betting1.9 per 1,000 · 2
Prop Bet 1Gambling 1
Team & Front Office79 per 1,000 · 82
Stadium Experience 7Coaching 56Crowd & Attendance 8Front Office 4Opponent Hostility 5Opponent Respect 2

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

8 explicit comments7.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym3
  • Violent Language3
  • Explicit Words2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 13.543.5 per 1,000 · L 3–45 at ToledoLLLWLWLLWWLW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2337.7L 0–10 vs Wyoming
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-060L 0–68 at Nebraska
2025-09-130L 28–31 at UAB
2025-09-208.9W 51–7 vs Duquesne
2025-09-2743.5L 3–45 at Toledo
2025-10-0411.1W 28–22 vs Central Michigan
2025-10-110L 7–20 vs Miami (Ohio)
2025-10-180L 28–42 at Ball State
2025-10-250W 24–16 at Buffalo
2025-11-010W 44–10 vs UMass
2025-11-0824.1L 35–42 (OT) vs Kent State
2025-11-1534.9W 19–16 at Bowling Green
2025-11-220No game
2025-11-290No game
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 43.5 per 1,000 comments (L 3–45 at Toledo) against a season average of 13.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks7
  • Harm Wish3
  • Group Hate1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability2
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Great day to be a Zip! Beat the Cowgirls!

positiveFacebook

21st portal player. Let's get it

positiveTransfer PortalFacebook

Embarrassing to be an Alumni. . Furham has better grades and would have been more competitive.

negativeFacebook

Looks special! Transfer out first chance you get kid

mixedTransfer PortalFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.