Arkansas State

Red Wolves · 7–6 in 2025–26

Compare Arkansas State with…
Fan Score
717.8
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
3,373
2025–26 season
Positive share
71.8%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
11.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Arkansas State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 8th percentile · Team & Front Office: 29th percentile · College Sports: 66th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Explicit Language, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Arkansas State Harm: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State College Sports: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Off-Field Storylines: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State Team & Front Office: 29th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive71.8%2,421
Neutral11%370
Negative16%540
Mixed1.2%42

Signature subtags

What Arkansas State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.5×

Mentioned Recruiting at 2.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

11.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.8×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.8 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.3×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

15.4 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +98% · week of Jan 17Low: +3% · L 21–28 at Kennesaw StateAug 30: W 42–24 vs SE MissouriWSep 6: L 14–56 at ArkansasLSep 13: L 16–24 vs Iowa StateLSep 20: L 21–28 at Kennesaw StateLSep 27: L 16–28 at UL MonroeLOct 4: W 31–30 vs Texas StateWOct 14: W 15–14 at South AlabamaWOct 25: W 34–24 vs Georgia SouthernWNov 1: W 23–10 at TroyWNov 8: L 21–27 vs Southern MissLNov 20: L 30–34 vs LouisianaLNov 29: W 30–29 at Appalachian StateWDec 18: W 34–28 vs Missouri StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+74%66286No game
2025-08-30+52%14238201W 42–24 vs SE Missouri
2025-09-06+26%12871221L 14–56 at Arkansas
2025-09-13+35%10748170L 16–24 vs Iowa State
2025-09-20+3%6763140L 21–28 at Kennesaw State
2025-09-27+5%6054121L 16–28 at UL Monroe
2025-10-04+72%18422225W 31–30 vs Texas State
2025-10-11+44%12139186W 15–14 at South Alabama
2025-10-18+88%22025No game
2025-10-25+58%7213102W 34–24 vs Georgia Southern
2025-11-01+68%31411444W 23–10 at Troy
2025-11-08+73%11314136L 21–27 vs Southern Miss
2025-11-15+13%8059160L 30–34 vs Louisiana
2025-11-22+81%42348No game
2025-11-29+61%29357384W 30–29 at Appalachian State
2025-12-06+81%36143No game
2025-12-13+91%2473269W 34–28 vs Missouri State
2025-12-20+93%63167No game
2025-12-27+96%25026No game
2026-01-03+15%453382No game
2026-01-10+57%707111No game
2026-01-17+98%1241126No game
Fan mood fell 82 points the week of Jan 3.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%49%98%Aug 30: W 42–24 vs SE MissouriWSep 6: L 14–56 at ArkansasLSep 13: L 16–24 vs Iowa StateLSep 20: L 21–28 at Kennesaw StateLSep 27: L 16–28 at UL MonroeLOct 4: W 31–30 vs Texas StateWOct 14: W 15–14 at South AlabamaWOct 25: W 34–24 vs Georgia SouthernWNov 1: W 23–10 at TroyWNov 8: L 21–27 vs Southern MissLNov 20: L 30–34 vs LouisianaLNov 29: W 30–29 at Appalachian StateWDec 18: W 34–28 vs Missouri StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2376.7%2.3%86
2025-08-3070.6%18.9%201
2025-09-0657.9%32.1%221
2025-09-1362.9%28.2%170
2025-09-2047.9%45%140
2025-09-2749.6%44.6%121
2025-10-0481.8%9.8%225
2025-10-1165.1%21%186
2025-10-1888%0%25
2025-10-2570.6%12.7%102
2025-11-0170.7%2.5%444
2025-11-0883.1%10.3%136
2025-11-1550%36.9%160
2025-11-2287.5%6.3%48
2025-11-2976.3%14.8%384
2025-12-0683.7%2.3%43
2025-12-1391.8%1.1%269
2025-12-2094%1.5%67
2025-12-2796.2%0%26
2026-01-0354.9%40.2%82
2026-01-1063.1%6.3%111
2026-01-1798.4%0.8%126

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm9.2 per 1,000 · 31
Personal Attacks 29Group Hate 1Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse2.1 per 1,000 · 7
Race 2Disability 1Age 1Physical Appearance 3Gender 1
Explicit Language2.1 per 1,000 · 7
Explicit Acronym 5Explicit Words 1Violent Language 1
College Sports19.9 per 1,000 · 67
Student Section 4Band 11Recruiting 40NIL 9Transfer Portal 6Conference Realignment 1
Off-Field Storylines31.1 per 1,000 · 105
Broadcast & Media 52Injuries 7Officiating 48
Sports Betting1.8 per 1,000 · 6
Gambling 3Prop Bet 2Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office105.2 per 1,000 · 355
Coaching 197Stadium Experience 15Opponent Hostility 64Crowd & Attendance 60Opponent Respect 24Front Office 3Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

7 explicit comments2.1 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym5
  • Explicit Words1
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 2.1 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 11.336.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 3)WLLLLWWWWLLWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3034.8W 42–24 vs SE Missouri
2025-09-0631.7L 14–56 at Arkansas
2025-09-1311.8L 16–24 vs Iowa State
2025-09-2035.7L 21–28 at Kennesaw State
2025-09-2716.5L 16–28 at UL Monroe
2025-10-0413.3W 31–30 vs Texas State
2025-10-110W 15–14 at South Alabama
2025-10-180No game
2025-10-2519.6W 34–24 vs Georgia Southern
2025-11-010W 23–10 at Troy
2025-11-0822.1L 21–27 vs Southern Miss
2025-11-1512.5L 30–34 vs Louisiana
2025-11-220No game
2025-11-290W 30–29 at Appalachian State
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130W 34–28 vs Missouri State
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0336.6No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-1715.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 36.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 3)) against a season average of 11.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks29
  • Group Hate1
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Race2
  • Disability1
  • Age1
  • Gender1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

MeganAnn Jones uhhh yeaaa

positiveFacebook

Congratulations 🎉 Howl Yeah

positiveFacebook

Still sleeping evidently!!!

negativeFacebook

Offense is horrible, but how about the defense? They kept us in the game until our inept offense did just enough to win.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.