Eastern Michigan

Eagles · 4–8 in 2025–26

Compare Eastern Michigan with…
Fan Score
611.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
67
2025–26 season
Positive share
61.2%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
29.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Eastern Michigan fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Eastern Michigan Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive61.2%41
Neutral11.9%8
Negative25.4%17
Mixed1.5%1
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Aug 23Low: −100% · L 23–48 at KentuckyAug 30: L 27–52 at Texas StateLSep 6: L 23–28 vs Long IslandLSep 13: L 23–48 at KentuckyLSep 20: W 34–31 vs LouisianaWSep 27: L 13–24 at Central MichiganLOct 4: L 30–31 (OT) at BuffaloLOct 11: W 16–10 vs Northern IllinoisWOct 18: L 30–44 at Miami (Ohio)LOct 25: L 21–28 vs OhioLNov 8: W 27–21 vs Bowling GreenWNov 15: W 24–9 at Ball StateWNov 25: L 21–31 vs Western MichiganLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+100%101No game
2025-08-30+100%101L 27–52 at Texas State
2025-09-06+100%101L 23–28 vs Long Island
2025-09-13−100%011L 23–48 at Kentucky
2025-09-20No comments000W 34–31 vs Louisiana
2025-09-27No comments000L 13–24 at Central Michigan
2025-10-04+100%404L 30–31 (OT) at Buffalo
2025-10-11+100%202W 16–10 vs Northern Illinois
2025-10-18+0%112L 30–44 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-10-25+0%001L 21–28 vs Ohio
2025-11-01No comments000No game
2025-11-08+36%7311W 27–21 vs Bowling Green
2025-11-15+20%13825W 24–9 at Ball State
2025-11-22+100%303L 21–31 vs Western Michigan
2025-11-29+100%202No game
2025-12-06+57%517No game
2025-12-13−100%011No game
2025-12-20No comments000No game
2025-12-27No comments000No game
2026-01-03No comments000No game
2026-01-10No comments000No game
2026-01-17−20%125No game
Fan mood fell 200 points the week they lost by 25 at Kentucky.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: L 27–52 at Texas StateLSep 6: L 23–28 vs Long IslandLSep 13: L 23–48 at KentuckyLSep 20: W 34–31 vs LouisianaWSep 27: L 13–24 at Central MichiganLOct 4: L 30–31 (OT) at BuffaloLOct 11: W 16–10 vs Northern IllinoisWOct 18: L 30–44 at Miami (Ohio)LOct 25: L 21–28 vs OhioLNov 8: W 27–21 vs Bowling GreenWNov 15: W 24–9 at Ball StateWNov 25: L 21–31 vs Western MichiganLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-23100%0%1
2025-08-30100%0%1
2025-09-06100%0%1
2025-09-130%100%1
2025-09-200%0%0
2025-09-270%0%0
2025-10-04100%0%4
2025-10-11100%0%2
2025-10-1850%50%2
2025-10-250%0%1
2025-11-010%0%0
2025-11-0863.6%27.3%11
2025-11-1552%32%25
2025-11-22100%0%3
2025-11-29100%0%2
2025-12-0671.4%14.3%7
2025-12-130%100%1
2025-12-200%0%0
2025-12-270%0%0
2026-01-030%0%0
2026-01-100%0%0
2026-01-1720%40%5

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm29.9 per 1,000 · 2
Personal Attacks 2
Identity-Based Abuse0 per 1,000 · 0
Explicit Language0 per 1,000 · 0
College Sports29.9 per 1,000 · 2
Recruiting 1NIL 1
Off-Field Storylines14.9 per 1,000 · 1
Broadcast & Media 1
Sports Betting0 per 1,000 · 0
Team & Front Office268.7 per 1,000 · 18
Front Office 2Coaching 15Stadium Experience 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

0 explicit comments0 per 1,000

No explicit-language subtag classifications recorded.

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 0 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 29.980 per 1,000 · W 24–9 at Ball StateLLLWLLWLLWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300L 27–52 at Texas State
2025-09-060L 23–28 vs Long Island
2025-09-130L 23–48 at Kentucky
2025-09-200W 34–31 vs Louisiana
2025-09-270L 13–24 at Central Michigan
2025-10-040L 30–31 (OT) at Buffalo
2025-10-110W 16–10 vs Northern Illinois
2025-10-180L 30–44 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-10-250L 21–28 vs Ohio
2025-11-010No game
2025-11-080W 27–21 vs Bowling Green
2025-11-1580W 24–9 at Ball State
2025-11-220L 21–31 vs Western Michigan
2025-11-290No game
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 80 per 1,000 comments (W 24–9 at Ball State) against a season average of 29.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Been waiting for this to drop! Go green!

positiveFacebook

Welcome…congratulations…💚💚💚💚

positiveFacebook

Actually I believe the athletic department is trying to drive the baseball program away

negativeFacebook

Love our coaches 🙌🏽 appreciate you all 💚🦅

positiveCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.