LSU

Tigers · 7–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
425.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
95,525
2025–26 season
Positive share
42.6%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
68.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects LSU fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 97th percentile · Team & Front Office: 95th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 86th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • LSU Harm: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU Identity-Based Abuse: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU College Sports: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU Sports Betting: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • LSU Team & Front Office: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive42.6%40,686
Neutral10%9,587
Negative45.3%43,247
Mixed2.1%2,005

Signature subtags

What LSU fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Harm
2.6×

Mentioned Sexual Content at 2.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.7 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
2.2×

Mentioned Gender at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.4 per 1,000 comments
Harm
2.2×

Mentioned Harm Wish at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+70%+35%−35%−70%0%Peak: +62% · week of Aug 23Low: −52% · L 19–24 at Ole MissAug 30: W 17–10 at ClemsonWSep 6: W 23–7 vs Louisiana TechWSep 13: W 20–10 vs FloridaWSep 20: W 56–10 vs SE LouisianaWSep 27: L 19–24 at Ole MissLOct 11: W 20–10 vs South CarolinaWOct 18: L 24–31 at VanderbiltLOct 25: L 25–49 vs Texas A&MLNov 8: L 9–20 at AlabamaLNov 15: W 23–22 vs ArkansasWNov 22: W 13–10 vs WKUWNov 29: L 13–17 at OklahomaLDec 27: L 35–38 vs HoustonLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+62%1,6782652,292No game
2025-08-30+35%5,3382,3408,651W 17–10 at Clemson
2025-09-06+16%1,7421,1803,500W 23–7 vs Louisiana Tech
2025-09-13+12%2,1831,6574,406W 20–10 vs Florida
2025-09-20+26%1,6458722,925W 56–10 vs SE Louisiana
2025-09-27−52%1,4345,3127,436L 19–24 at Ole Miss
2025-10-04+14%7115061,457No game
2025-10-11+5%1,7831,6093,841W 20–10 vs South Carolina
2025-10-18−40%2,1425,5888,660L 24–31 at Vanderbilt
2025-10-25−25%2,4144,3537,659L 25–49 vs Texas A&M
2025-11-01+26%5562921,011No game
2025-11-08−12%1,2971,7013,335L 9–20 at Alabama
2025-11-15+56%4,2051,0085,692W 23–22 vs Arkansas
2025-11-22+3%2,0191,8734,354W 13–10 vs WKU
2025-11-29−26%5,3199,76317,168L 13–17 at Oklahoma
2025-12-06+15%2,1651,4874,507No game
2025-12-13+39%7542951,175No game
2025-12-20+19%6914391,303No game
2025-12-27−16%1,4852,1844,240L 35–38 vs Houston
2026-01-03+15%358254701No game
2026-01-10+45%7052231,079No game
2026-01-17+12%6246133No game
Fan mood fell 79 points the week they lost by 5 at Ole Miss.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%74%Aug 30: W 17–10 at ClemsonWSep 6: W 23–7 vs Louisiana TechWSep 13: W 20–10 vs FloridaWSep 20: W 56–10 vs SE LouisianaWSep 27: L 19–24 at Ole MissLOct 11: W 20–10 vs South CarolinaWOct 18: L 24–31 at VanderbiltLOct 25: L 25–49 vs Texas A&MLNov 8: L 9–20 at AlabamaLNov 15: W 23–22 vs ArkansasWNov 22: W 13–10 vs WKUWNov 29: L 13–17 at OklahomaLDec 27: L 35–38 vs HoustonLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2373.2%11.6%2,292
2025-08-3061.7%27%8,651
2025-09-0649.8%33.7%3,500
2025-09-1349.5%37.6%4,406
2025-09-2056.2%29.8%2,925
2025-09-2719.3%71.4%7,436
2025-10-0448.8%34.7%1,457
2025-10-1146.4%41.9%3,841
2025-10-1824.7%64.5%8,660
2025-10-2531.5%56.8%7,659
2025-11-0155%28.9%1,011
2025-11-0838.9%51%3,335
2025-11-1573.9%17.7%5,692
2025-11-2246.4%43%4,354
2025-11-2931%56.9%17,168
2025-12-0648%33%4,507
2025-12-1364.2%25.1%1,175
2025-12-2053%33.7%1,303
2025-12-2735%51.5%4,240
2026-01-0351.1%36.2%701
2026-01-1065.3%20.7%1,079
2026-01-1746.6%34.6%133

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm57.9 per 1,000 · 5,528
Death Threat 1Group Hate 147Harm Wish 121Personal Attacks 5,187Sexual Content 354Violent Threat 10
Identity-Based Abuse10.5 per 1,000 · 1,001
Disability 159Age 78Gender 417LGBTQIA+ 26Physical Appearance 223Race 105Religion 15
Explicit Language35.3 per 1,000 · 3,375
Explicit Acronym 722Explicit Emoji 86Explicit Words 2,595Usual Suspects 1Violent Language 47
College Sports14.8 per 1,000 · 1,409
Band 192Conference Realignment 31NIL 369Recruiting 488Student Section 16Transfer Portal 363
Off-Field Storylines32.4 per 1,000 · 3,095
Broadcast & Media 1,001Injuries 716Officiating 1,278Player Conduct 64Politics & Activism 53
Sports Betting3.2 per 1,000 · 307
Gambling 236Moneyline 25Parlay 8Prediction Market 1Prop Bet 37
Team & Front Office213.5 per 1,000 · 20,390
Coaching 15,549Crowd & Attendance 949Front Office 579Opponent Hostility 2,681Opponent Respect 512Athletic Department 42Stadium Experience 500

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

81st percentile
3,375 explicit comments35.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words2,595
  • Explicit Acronym722
  • Explicit Emoji86
  • Violent Language47
  • Usual Suspects1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 35.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 20th of 100 nationally, the 81st percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 68.3142.9 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWWLWLLLWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2331No game
2025-08-3036.5W 17–10 at Clemson
2025-09-0622.9W 23–7 vs Louisiana Tech
2025-09-1340.4W 20–10 vs Florida
2025-09-2038.3W 56–10 vs SE Louisiana
2025-09-2777.7L 19–24 at Ole Miss
2025-10-0443.2No game
2025-10-1156.2W 20–10 vs South Carolina
2025-10-1861.9L 24–31 at Vanderbilt
2025-10-2567.2L 25–49 vs Texas A&M
2025-11-0142.5No game
2025-11-0858.5L 9–20 at Alabama
2025-11-1520.4W 23–22 vs Arkansas
2025-11-2235.4W 13–10 vs WKU
2025-11-29138.8L 13–17 at Oklahoma
2025-12-0669.4No game
2025-12-1359.6No game
2025-12-2062.2No game
2025-12-2789.4L 35–38 vs Houston
2026-01-0399.9No game
2026-01-1038No game
2026-01-17142.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 142.9 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 68.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks5,187
  • Sexual Content354
  • Group Hate147
  • Harm Wish121
  • Violent Threat10
  • Death Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender417
  • Physical Appearance223
  • Disability159
  • Race105
  • Age78
  • LGBTQIA+26
  • Religion15

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Whit looking like a kid in a candy store 😂

positiveFacebook

Thank you Brother of CHRIST JESUS.

positiveFacebook

…… how did that result impress you??? I’ll tell you….. it was an embarrassing performance. Either BK, Sloan,….. or both have to go.

negativeCoachingFacebook

Screw the Aggies!! Geaux Tigers!!!

mixedOpponent HostilityFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.