UTSA

Roadrunners · 7–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
681
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
3,498
2025–26 season
Positive share
68.1%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
21.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UTSA fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 88th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 32nd percentile · Harm: 34th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UTSA Harm: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTSA Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UTSA Explicit Language: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTSA College Sports: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTSA Off-Field Storylines: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTSA Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UTSA Team & Front Office: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive68.1%2,382
Neutral10%351
Negative20.3%711
Mixed1.5%54

Signature subtags

What UTSA fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
3.2×

Mentioned Recruiting at 3.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

14.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.7×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 2.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

26 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.8×

Mentioned NIL at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.9 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +85% · week of Dec 13Low: −36% · L 17–55 at North TexasAug 30: L 24–42 at Texas A&MLSep 6: L 36–43 vs Texas StateLSep 13: W 48–20 vs Incarnate WordWSep 20: W 17–16 at Colorado StateWOct 4: L 21–27 at TempleLOct 11: W 61–13 vs RiceWOct 18: L 17–55 at North TexasLOct 30: W 48–26 vs TulaneWNov 6: L 23–55 at South FloridaLNov 15: W 28–7 at CharlotteWNov 22: W 58–24 vs East CarolinaWNov 29: L 24–27 vs ArmyLDec 26: W 57–20 vs FIUWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+72%14112178No game
2025-08-30+59%25856343L 24–42 at Texas A&M
2025-09-06−9%92114237L 36–43 vs Texas State
2025-09-13+66%8114102W 48–20 vs Incarnate Word
2025-09-20+32%8841147W 17–16 at Colorado State
2025-09-27+45%25544No game
2025-10-04+12%8968177L 21–27 at Temple
2025-10-11+71%13212168W 61–13 vs Rice
2025-10-18−36%225284L 17–55 at North Texas
2025-10-25+71%13114164W 48–26 vs Tulane
2025-11-01+60%19143247L 23–55 at South Florida
2025-11-08+55%30840No game
2025-11-15+63%13624179W 28–7 at Charlotte
2025-11-22+58%18640252W 58–24 vs East Carolina
2025-11-29+25%11465200L 24–27 vs Army
2025-12-06+58%611383No game
2025-12-13+85%24127No game
2025-12-20+45%15843255W 57–20 vs FIU
2025-12-27+62%31662412No game
2026-01-03+71%46656No game
2026-01-10+67%46364No game
2026-01-17+0%151539No game
Fan mood fell 107 points the week they lost by 38 at North Texas.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%44%89%Aug 30: L 24–42 at Texas A&MLSep 6: L 36–43 vs Texas StateLSep 13: W 48–20 vs Incarnate WordWSep 20: W 17–16 at Colorado StateWOct 4: L 21–27 at TempleLOct 11: W 61–13 vs RiceWOct 18: L 17–55 at North TexasLOct 30: W 48–26 vs TulaneWNov 6: L 23–55 at South FloridaLNov 15: W 28–7 at CharlotteWNov 22: W 58–24 vs East CarolinaWNov 29: L 24–27 vs ArmyLDec 26: W 57–20 vs FIUWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2379.2%6.7%178
2025-08-3075.2%16.3%343
2025-09-0638.8%48.1%237
2025-09-1379.4%13.7%102
2025-09-2059.9%27.9%147
2025-09-2756.8%11.4%44
2025-10-0450.3%38.4%177
2025-10-1178.6%7.1%168
2025-10-1826.2%61.9%84
2025-10-2579.9%8.5%164
2025-11-0177.3%17.4%247
2025-11-0875%20%40
2025-11-1576%13.4%179
2025-11-2273.8%15.9%252
2025-11-2957%32.5%200
2025-12-0673.5%15.7%83
2025-12-1388.9%3.7%27
2025-12-2062%16.9%255
2025-12-2776.7%15%412
2026-01-0382.1%10.7%56
2026-01-1071.9%4.7%64
2026-01-1738.5%38.5%39

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm18.9 per 1,000 · 66
Personal Attacks 63Harm Wish 1Group Hate 2
Identity-Based Abuse2.9 per 1,000 · 10
Gender 6Physical Appearance 5Age 1
Explicit Language17.4 per 1,000 · 61
Explicit Words 53Explicit Acronym 11Violent Language 3
College Sports29.4 per 1,000 · 103
Band 5Recruiting 52Conference Realignment 4Student Section 3Transfer Portal 21NIL 24
Off-Field Storylines22.9 per 1,000 · 80
Broadcast & Media 44Injuries 21Officiating 18Player Conduct 1Politics & Activism 1
Sports Betting1.7 per 1,000 · 6
Gambling 5Prop Bet 1
Team & Front Office119.8 per 1,000 · 419
Coaching 195Opponent Respect 30Crowd & Attendance 91Opponent Hostility 84Stadium Experience 27Front Office 8Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

47th percentile
61 explicit comments17.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words53
  • Explicit Acronym11
  • Violent Language3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 17.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 55th of 100 nationally, the 47th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 21.7179.5 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)LLWWLWLWLWWLW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-305.8L 24–42 at Texas A&M
2025-09-0650.6L 36–43 vs Texas State
2025-09-139.8W 48–20 vs Incarnate Word
2025-09-2061.2W 17–16 at Colorado State
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-0428.2L 21–27 at Temple
2025-10-1111.9W 61–13 vs Rice
2025-10-1859.5L 17–55 at North Texas
2025-10-256.1W 48–26 vs Tulane
2025-11-0128.3L 23–55 at South Florida
2025-11-080No game
2025-11-155.6W 28–7 at Charlotte
2025-11-2215.9W 58–24 vs East Carolina
2025-11-2935L 24–27 vs Army
2025-12-0612No game
2025-12-1337No game
2025-12-2015.7W 57–20 vs FIU
2025-12-2714.6No game
2026-01-0317.9No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-17179.5No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 179.5 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 21.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks63
  • Group Hate2
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender6
  • Physical Appearance5
  • Age1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Thanks Mr. Rice Go Runners 🤙

positiveFacebook

We are so proud of our Roadrunner football Team. We have so much to offer but we need fans to help us push it forward. Birds Up

positiveFacebook

Am I the only one that expects 4 and something? Geez!

negativeFacebook

It's unfortunate that UTSA isn't drawing full houses. Imagine the noise that would be created with 65k+ UTSA fans in attendance.

mixedCrowd & AttendanceFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.