UNLV

Rebels · 10–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
644.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
6,260
2025–26 season
Positive share
64.4%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
20.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UNLV fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Sports Betting: 92nd percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 18th percentile · College Sports: 81st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UNLV Harm: 29th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UNLV Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UNLV Explicit Language: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UNLV College Sports: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UNLV Off-Field Storylines: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UNLV Sports Betting: 92nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UNLV Team & Front Office: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive64.4%4,032
Neutral8.8%551
Negative25%1,566
Mixed1.8%111

Signature subtags

What UNLV fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
7.2×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 7.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

13.7 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.9×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.3 per 1,000 comments
Sports Betting
1.7×

Mentioned Gambling at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.5 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +88% · week of Jan 10Low: −28% · L 35–40 vs New MexicoAug 23: W 38–31 vs Idaho StWAug 29: W 38–21 at Sam HoustonWSep 6: W 30–23 vs UCLAWSep 20: W 41–38 at Miami (Ohio)WOct 4: W 31–17 at WyomingWOct 11: W 51–48 vs Air ForceWOct 18: L 31–56 at Boise StateLNov 1: L 35–40 vs New MexicoLNov 8: W 42–10 at Colorado StateWNov 15: W 29–26 (2OT) vs Utah StateWNov 21: W 38–10 vs HawaiiWNov 29: W 42–17 at NevadaWDec 5: L 21–38 at Boise StateLDec 23: L 10–17 vs OhioLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+43%17059259W 38–31 vs Idaho St; W 38–21 at Sam Houston
2025-08-30+52%621296No game
2025-09-06+69%11015137W 30–23 vs UCLA
2025-09-13+83%51259No game
2025-09-20+66%13221167W 41–38 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-09-27+69%10011129No game
2025-10-04+70%20221258W 31–17 at Wyoming
2025-10-11+62%38072497W 51–48 vs Air Force
2025-10-18−15%197277535L 31–56 at Boise State
2025-10-25+58%37752No game
2025-11-01−28%88170288L 35–40 vs New Mexico
2025-11-08+56%10726144W 42–10 at Colorado State
2025-11-15+58%24855333W 29–26 (2OT) vs Utah State; W 38–10 vs Hawaii
2025-11-22+75%32330390No game
2025-11-29+54%8952181,247W 42–17 at Nevada; L 21–38 at Boise State
2025-12-06−2%276292641No game
2025-12-13+27%8142146No game
2025-12-20+3%171161362L 10–17 vs Ohio
2025-12-27+41%251037No game
2026-01-03+40%13751215No game
2026-01-10+88%1477159No game
2026-01-17+79%937109No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 5 to New Mexico, gaining 104 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%46%93%Aug 23: W 38–31 vs Idaho StWAug 29: W 38–21 at Sam HoustonWSep 6: W 30–23 vs UCLAWSep 20: W 41–38 at Miami (Ohio)WOct 4: W 31–17 at WyomingWOct 11: W 51–48 vs Air ForceWOct 18: L 31–56 at Boise StateLNov 1: L 35–40 vs New MexicoLNov 8: W 42–10 at Colorado StateWNov 15: W 29–26 (2OT) vs Utah StateWNov 21: W 38–10 vs HawaiiWNov 29: W 42–17 at NevadaWDec 5: L 21–38 at Boise StateLDec 23: L 10–17 vs OhioLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2365.6%22.8%259
2025-08-3064.6%12.5%96
2025-09-0680.3%10.9%137
2025-09-1386.4%3.4%59
2025-09-2079%12.6%167
2025-09-2777.5%8.5%129
2025-10-0478.3%8.1%258
2025-10-1176.5%14.5%497
2025-10-1836.8%51.8%535
2025-10-2571.2%13.5%52
2025-11-0130.6%59%288
2025-11-0874.3%18.1%144
2025-11-1574.5%16.5%333
2025-11-2282.8%7.7%390
2025-11-2971.8%17.5%1,247
2025-12-0643.1%45.6%641
2025-12-1355.5%28.8%146
2025-12-2047.2%44.5%362
2025-12-2767.6%27%37
2026-01-0363.7%23.7%215
2026-01-1092.5%4.4%159
2026-01-1785.3%6.4%109

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm16.8 per 1,000 · 105
Group Hate 14Personal Attacks 88Sexual Content 4
Identity-Based Abuse3.4 per 1,000 · 21
Gender 8Age 3Physical Appearance 3Disability 6LGBTQIA+ 1
Explicit Language29.7 per 1,000 · 186
Explicit Words 164Explicit Acronym 24Violent Language 2Explicit Emoji 3
College Sports26 per 1,000 · 163
Recruiting 35Band 9Transfer Portal 22Conference Realignment 86NIL 9Student Section 5
Off-Field Storylines18.4 per 1,000 · 115
Broadcast & Media 55Officiating 33Injuries 23Politics & Activism 1Player Conduct 3
Sports Betting5.9 per 1,000 · 37
Prop Bet 7Gambling 28Moneyline 1Parlay 1
Team & Front Office120.6 per 1,000 · 755
Crowd & Attendance 52Coaching 341Opponent Hostility 252Stadium Experience 58Opponent Respect 68Front Office 3Athletic Department 3

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

69th percentile
186 explicit comments29.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words164
  • Explicit Acronym24
  • Explicit Emoji3
  • Violent Language2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 29.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 32nd of 100 nationally, the 69th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 20.160.8 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)WWWWWWLLWWWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2315.4W 38–31 vs Idaho St; W 38–21 at Sam Houston
2025-08-3020.8No game
2025-09-060W 30–23 vs UCLA
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-2012W 41–38 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-047.8W 31–17 at Wyoming
2025-10-114W 51–48 vs Air Force
2025-10-1824.3L 31–56 at Boise State
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-0117.4L 35–40 vs New Mexico
2025-11-0813.9W 42–10 at Colorado State
2025-11-159W 29–26 (2OT) vs Utah State; W 38–10 vs Hawaii
2025-11-222.6No game
2025-11-2916W 42–17 at Nevada; L 21–38 at Boise State
2025-12-0660.8No game
2025-12-136.8No game
2025-12-2052.5L 10–17 vs Ohio
2025-12-2727No game
2026-01-0337.2No game
2026-01-1012.6No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 60.8 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 20.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks88
  • Group Hate14
  • Sexual Content4
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender8
  • Disability6
  • Age3
  • Physical Appearance3
  • LGBTQIA+1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

LFG! Can't wait for tomorrow!

positiveFacebook

Congratulations Kirby! 🥳🤩🤗🤗🤗

positiveFacebook

That defense is laughable

negativeFacebook

Fun game but we got really lucky.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.