Sence
Sence Fan Index
College Football
ACC

Georgia Tech

Yellow Jackets · 9–4 in 2025–26

Compare Georgia Tech with…
Fan Score
670.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
35,814
2025–26 season
Positive share
67%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
17.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Georgia Tech fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Sports Betting: 2nd percentile · College Sports: 8th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 9th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Tech Harm: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Explicit Language: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech College Sports: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Sports Betting: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Team & Front Office: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive67%23,998
Neutral9.5%3,388
Negative21.3%7,637
Mixed2.2%791

Signature subtags

What Georgia Tech fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
1.4×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.8 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.3×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

12.6 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.2×

Mentioned Band at 1.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.5 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +82% · W 27–20 at ColoradoLow: −5% · L 36–48 at NC StateAug 29: W 27–20 at ColoradoWSep 6: W 59–12 vs Gardner-WebbWSep 13: W 24–21 vs ClemsonWSep 20: W 45–24 vs TempleWSep 27: W 30–29 (OT) at Wake ForestWOct 11: W 35–20 vs Virginia TechWOct 18: W 27–18 at DukeWOct 25: W 41–16 vs SyracuseWNov 1: L 36–48 at NC StateLNov 15: W 36–34 at Boston CollegeWNov 22: L 28–42 vs PittsburghLNov 28: L 9–16 vs GeorgiaLDec 27: L 21–25 vs BYULAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+82%890601,014W 27–20 at Colorado
2025-08-30+52%1,6574442,353No game
2025-09-06+61%8511341,175W 59–12 vs Gardner-Webb
2025-09-13+64%2,1923542,860W 24–21 vs Clemson
2025-09-20+47%9312651,406W 45–24 vs Temple
2025-09-27+24%1,2657342,249W 30–29 (OT) at Wake Forest
2025-10-04+61%644104879No game
2025-10-11+58%1,4012931,918W 35–20 vs Virginia Tech
2025-10-18+59%2,0794242,784W 27–18 at Duke
2025-10-25+64%1,7333002,254W 41–16 vs Syracuse
2025-11-01−5%8489482,012L 36–48 at NC State
2025-11-08+54%486116691No game
2025-11-15+22%2,3811,3864,480W 36–34 at Boston College
2025-11-22+24%1,6009312,845L 28–42 vs Pittsburgh; L 9–16 vs Georgia
2025-11-29+58%1,4703411,947No game
2025-12-06+60%7571521,007No game
2025-12-13+69%1,0851541,355No game
2025-12-20+72%76977964No game
2025-12-27+26%6183231,116L 21–25 vs BYU
2026-01-03+52%22356322No game
2026-01-10+56%9120126No game
2026-01-17+11%272157No game
Fan mood fell 69 points the week they lost by 12 at NC State.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%44%88%Aug 29: W 27–20 at ColoradoWSep 6: W 59–12 vs Gardner-WebbWSep 13: W 24–21 vs ClemsonWSep 20: W 45–24 vs TempleWSep 27: W 30–29 (OT) at Wake ForestWOct 11: W 35–20 vs Virginia TechWOct 18: W 27–18 at DukeWOct 25: W 41–16 vs SyracuseWNov 1: L 36–48 at NC StateLNov 15: W 36–34 at Boston CollegeWNov 22: L 28–42 vs PittsburghLNov 28: L 9–16 vs GeorgiaLDec 27: L 21–25 vs BYULAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2387.8%5.9%1,014
2025-08-3070.4%18.9%2,353
2025-09-0672.4%11.4%1,175
2025-09-1376.6%12.4%2,860
2025-09-2066.2%18.8%1,406
2025-09-2756.2%32.6%2,249
2025-10-0473.3%11.8%879
2025-10-1173%15.3%1,918
2025-10-1874.7%15.2%2,784
2025-10-2576.9%13.3%2,254
2025-11-0142.1%47.1%2,012
2025-11-0870.3%16.8%691
2025-11-1553.1%30.9%4,480
2025-11-2256.2%32.7%2,845
2025-11-2975.5%17.5%1,947
2025-12-0675.2%15.1%1,007
2025-12-1380.1%11.4%1,355
2025-12-2079.8%8%964
2025-12-2755.4%28.9%1,116
2026-01-0369.3%17.4%322
2026-01-1072.2%15.9%126
2026-01-1747.4%36.8%57

Season timeline

  1. Aug 29W 27–20at Colorado
  2. Sep 6W 59–12vs Gardner-Webb
  3. Sep 13W 24–21vs Clemson
  4. Sep 20W 45–24vs Temple
  5. Sep 27W 30–29at Wake Forest (OT)
  6. Oct 11W 35–20vs Virginia Tech
  7. Oct 18W 27–18at Duke
  8. Oct 25W 41–16vs Syracuse
  9. Nov 1L 36–48at NC State
  10. Nov 15W 36–34at Boston College
  11. Nov 22L 28–42vs Pittsburgh
  12. Nov 28L 9–16vs GeorgiaNeutral
  13. Dec 27L 21–25vs BYUNeutral
Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm14.2 per 1,000 · 508
Personal Attacks 450Group Hate 45Sexual Content 15Harm Wish 7
Identity-Based Abuse3.1 per 1,000 · 110
Gender 24Disability 16Physical Appearance 39Race 8LGBTQIA+ 10Age 15Religion 4
Explicit Language9.3 per 1,000 · 333
Explicit Words 247Explicit Acronym 80Violent Language 11Explicit Emoji 7
College Sports8.2 per 1,000 · 292
Recruiting 108Student Section 26NIL 28Band 55Transfer Portal 68Conference Realignment 13
Off-Field Storylines28.9 per 1,000 · 1,034
Injuries 250Officiating 398Broadcast & Media 382Politics & Activism 6Player Conduct 3
Sports Betting1.5 per 1,000 · 55
Gambling 47Parlay 3Prop Bet 3Moneyline 2
Team & Front Office94.5 per 1,000 · 3,385
Crowd & Attendance 451Opponent Respect 190Stadium Experience 243Coaching 1,822Opponent Hostility 698Front Office 44Athletic Department 4

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

23rd percentile
333 explicit comments9.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words247
  • Explicit Acronym80
  • Violent Language11
  • Explicit Emoji7

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 9.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 78th of 100 nationally, the 23rd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 17.352.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWWWWWWLWLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2310.8W 27–20 at Colorado
2025-08-3022.5No game
2025-09-0620.4W 59–12 vs Gardner-Webb
2025-09-1311.2W 24–21 vs Clemson
2025-09-2022.8W 45–24 vs Temple
2025-09-2722.2W 30–29 (OT) at Wake Forest
2025-10-0411.4No game
2025-10-1119.8W 35–20 vs Virginia Tech
2025-10-1816.9W 27–18 at Duke
2025-10-2521.7W 41–16 vs Syracuse
2025-11-0111.9L 36–48 at NC State
2025-11-0815.9No game
2025-11-1517W 36–34 at Boston College
2025-11-2215.8L 28–42 vs Pittsburgh; L 9–16 vs Georgia
2025-11-2918No game
2025-12-0611.9No game
2025-12-1318.5No game
2025-12-2012.4No game
2025-12-2714.3L 21–25 vs BYU
2026-01-0334.2No game
2026-01-1015.9No game
2026-01-1752.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 52.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 17.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks450
  • Group Hate45
  • Sexual Content15
  • Harm Wish7
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance39
  • Gender24
  • Disability16
  • Age15
  • LGBTQIA+10
  • Race8
  • Religion4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

“Congratulations 🎊🎈🎉 King#10!”

positiveFacebook

“Let's Work "Sonshine"!!💛🐝🏈🦈😍🙏🏽”

positiveFacebook

“Defense fell asleep on a few key plays plus they started off and were always a step or two ahead.”

negativeFacebook

“All the haters were right unfortunately. Still love the Jackets. Still looking at 9-4 after an 8-0 start with that defense.”

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.

See Sence on your communityAbout the data