UMass

Minutemen · 0–12 in 2025–26

Fan Score
551.2
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
1,455
2025–26 season
Positive share
55.1%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
9.6
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UMass fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UMass Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive55.1%802
Neutral9.8%143
Negative33.3%485
Mixed1.7%25
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +94% · week of Aug 23Low: −30% · L 3–45 vs Northern IllinoisAug 30: L 10–42 vs TempleLSep 6: L 26–27 vs BryantLSep 13: L 7–47 at IowaLSep 27: L 6–42 at MissouriLOct 4: L 3–21 vs Western MichiganLOct 11: L 6–42 at Kent StateLOct 18: L 21–28 vs BuffaloLOct 25: L 13–38 at Central MichiganLNov 4: L 10–44 at AkronLNov 12: L 3–45 vs Northern IllinoisLNov 18: L 14–42 at OhioLNov 25: L 14–45 vs Bowling GreenLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+94%64068No game
2025-08-30+10%403278L 10–42 vs Temple
2025-09-06+23%452681L 26–27 vs Bryant
2025-09-13+12%191442L 7–47 at Iowa
2025-09-20+86%26129No game
2025-09-27+16%11819L 6–42 at Missouri
2025-10-04−3%181940L 3–21 vs Western Michigan
2025-10-11−5%6067139L 6–42 at Kent State
2025-10-18+19%5938110L 21–28 vs Buffalo
2025-10-25+42%16624L 13–38 at Central Michigan
2025-11-01−4%252868L 10–44 at Akron
2025-11-08−30%3165114L 3–45 vs Northern Illinois
2025-11-15−6%404694L 14–42 at Ohio
2025-11-22+31%9446154L 14–45 vs Bowling Green
2025-11-29−12%3648100No game
2025-12-06+60%19425No game
2025-12-13+56%28541No game
2025-12-20+30%8220No game
2025-12-27+55%35751No game
2026-01-03+69%32539No game
2026-01-10+67%671282No game
2026-01-17+62%29637No game
Fan mood fell 84 points the week they lost by 32 to Temple.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%47%94%Aug 30: L 10–42 vs TempleLSep 6: L 26–27 vs BryantLSep 13: L 7–47 at IowaLSep 27: L 6–42 at MissouriLOct 4: L 3–21 vs Western MichiganLOct 11: L 6–42 at Kent StateLOct 18: L 21–28 vs BuffaloLOct 25: L 13–38 at Central MichiganLNov 4: L 10–44 at AkronLNov 12: L 3–45 vs Northern IllinoisLNov 18: L 14–42 at OhioLNov 25: L 14–45 vs Bowling GreenLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2394.1%0%68
2025-08-3051.3%41%78
2025-09-0655.6%32.1%81
2025-09-1345.2%33.3%42
2025-09-2089.7%3.4%29
2025-09-2757.9%42.1%19
2025-10-0445%47.5%40
2025-10-1143.2%48.2%139
2025-10-1853.6%34.5%110
2025-10-2566.7%25%24
2025-11-0136.8%41.2%68
2025-11-0827.2%57%114
2025-11-1542.6%48.9%94
2025-11-2261%29.9%154
2025-11-2936%48%100
2025-12-0676%16%25
2025-12-1368.3%12.2%41
2025-12-2040%10%20
2025-12-2768.6%13.7%51
2026-01-0382.1%12.8%39
2026-01-1081.7%14.6%82
2026-01-1778.4%16.2%37

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm8.9 per 1,000 · 13
Personal Attacks 11Harm Wish 1Group Hate 1
Identity-Based Abuse0.7 per 1,000 · 1
Gender 1
Explicit Language1.4 per 1,000 · 2
Explicit Acronym 1Explicit Words 1
College Sports45.4 per 1,000 · 66
Transfer Portal 7Conference Realignment 15Recruiting 21NIL 9Band 11Student Section 3
Off-Field Storylines22 per 1,000 · 32
Officiating 3Broadcast & Media 20Injuries 9
Sports Betting9.6 per 1,000 · 14
Gambling 12Prop Bet 2
Team & Front Office114.1 per 1,000 · 166
Coaching 108Front Office 11Stadium Experience 23Crowd & Attendance 15Opponent Hostility 4Opponent Respect 4Athletic Department 2

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

2 explicit comments1.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym1
  • Explicit Words1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 1.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 9.647.6 per 1,000 · L 7–47 at IowaLLLLLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300L 10–42 vs Temple
2025-09-060L 26–27 vs Bryant
2025-09-1347.6L 7–47 at Iowa
2025-09-200No game
2025-09-270L 6–42 at Missouri
2025-10-040L 3–21 vs Western Michigan
2025-10-110L 6–42 at Kent State
2025-10-1827.3L 21–28 vs Buffalo
2025-10-250L 13–38 at Central Michigan
2025-11-0129.4L 10–44 at Akron
2025-11-080L 3–45 vs Northern Illinois
2025-11-1521.3L 14–42 at Ohio
2025-11-220L 14–45 vs Bowling Green
2025-11-2930No game
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-1012.2No game
2026-01-1727No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 47.6 per 1,000 comments (L 7–47 at Iowa) against a season average of 9.6 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks11
  • Group Hate1
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

they’ve been working so hard- hope it’s a great season! ❤️🏈

positiveFacebook

We must make sure we recruit an offensive line from the transfer portal. An older experienced line!! Nothing will happen without that improvement!!

positiveTransfer PortalFacebook

Well, it is basketball season at the University of Massachusetts The Football program needs to improve on the field

negativeFacebook

They should have played in the dark! Just being wise guy. Nice try Minetemen. Better luck next week. Stay strong!

mixedOpponent HostilityFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.