Michigan

Wolverines · 9–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
472.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
133,763
2025–26 season
Positive share
47.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
76.4
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Michigan fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 98th percentile · Explicit Language: 98th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 96th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Michigan Harm: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Explicit Language: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan College Sports: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Off-Field Storylines: 48th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Sports Betting: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Team & Front Office: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive47.2%63,145
Neutral8.7%11,663
Negative42.2%56,489
Mixed1.8%2,466

Signature subtags

What Michigan fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Harm
2.7×

Mentioned Sexual Content at 2.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.8 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
2.4×

Mentioned LGBTQIA+ at 2.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.7 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
2.1×

Mentioned Age at 2.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.9 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+50%+25%−25%−50%0%Peak: +45% · W 45–20 at MarylandLow: −42% · L 13–31 at USCAug 30: W 34–17 vs New MexicoWSep 6: L 13–24 at OklahomaLSep 13: W 63–3 vs Central MichiganWSep 20: W 30–27 at NebraskaWOct 4: W 24–10 vs WisconsinWOct 11: L 13–31 at USCLOct 18: W 24–7 vs WashingtonWOct 25: W 31–20 at Michigan StateWNov 1: W 21–16 vs PurdueWNov 15: W 24–22 at NorthwesternWNov 22: W 45–20 at MarylandWNov 29: L 9–27 vs Ohio StateLDec 31: L 27–41 vs TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+36%2,1709173,442No game
2025-08-30+20%5,0313,1729,156W 34–17 vs New Mexico
2025-09-06−35%2,9186,43810,200L 13–24 at Oklahoma
2025-09-13+12%2,7942,1375,463W 63–3 vs Central Michigan
2025-09-20+7%2,7562,3435,667W 30–27 at Nebraska
2025-09-27+29%1,1155431,960No game
2025-10-04+27%2,9771,6075,011W 24–10 vs Wisconsin
2025-10-11−42%2,1305,6818,499L 13–31 at USC
2025-10-18+26%3,4621,9035,895W 24–7 vs Washington
2025-10-25+13%3,7002,7487,053W 31–20 at Michigan State
2025-11-01−9%2,7153,3496,747W 21–16 vs Purdue
2025-11-08+24%1,2136802,189No game
2025-11-15+1%4,3234,2669,849W 24–22 at Northwestern
2025-11-22+45%6,5892,1409,811W 45–20 at Maryland
2025-11-29−21%4,9688,00614,809L 9–27 vs Ohio State
2025-12-06−3%1,7021,8464,128No game
2025-12-13−1%1,4751,5003,380No game
2025-12-20+15%1,3569642,610No game
2025-12-27+15%6,7294,80112,743L 27–41 vs Texas
2026-01-03+26%1,8711,0033,286No game
2026-01-10+38%7022681,151No game
2026-01-17+38%449177714No game
Fan mood fell 69 points the week they lost by 18 at USC.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%34%67%Aug 30: W 34–17 vs New MexicoWSep 6: L 13–24 at OklahomaLSep 13: W 63–3 vs Central MichiganWSep 20: W 30–27 at NebraskaWOct 4: W 24–10 vs WisconsinWOct 11: L 13–31 at USCLOct 18: W 24–7 vs WashingtonWOct 25: W 31–20 at Michigan StateWNov 1: W 21–16 vs PurdueWNov 15: W 24–22 at NorthwesternWNov 22: W 45–20 at MarylandWNov 29: L 9–27 vs Ohio StateLDec 31: L 27–41 vs TexasLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2363%26.6%3,442
2025-08-3054.9%34.6%9,156
2025-09-0628.6%63.1%10,200
2025-09-1351.1%39.1%5,463
2025-09-2048.6%41.3%5,667
2025-09-2756.9%27.7%1,960
2025-10-0459.4%32.1%5,011
2025-10-1125.1%66.8%8,499
2025-10-1858.7%32.3%5,895
2025-10-2552.5%39%7,053
2025-11-0140.2%49.6%6,747
2025-11-0855.4%31.1%2,189
2025-11-1543.9%43.3%9,849
2025-11-2267.2%21.8%9,811
2025-11-2933.5%54.1%14,809
2025-12-0641.2%44.7%4,128
2025-12-1343.6%44.4%3,380
2025-12-2052%36.9%2,610
2025-12-2752.8%37.7%12,743
2026-01-0356.9%30.5%3,286
2026-01-1061%23.3%1,151
2026-01-1762.9%24.8%714

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments once this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm62.5 per 1,000 · 8,362
Death Threat 4Group Hate 425Harm Wish 89Personal Attacks 7,717Sexual Content 502Violent Threat 27
Identity-Based Abuse13.9 per 1,000 · 1,864
Disability 366Age 249Gender 513LGBTQIA+ 225Physical Appearance 404Race 142Religion 35
Explicit Language52.2 per 1,000 · 6,987
Explicit Acronym 1,089Explicit Emoji 189Explicit Words 5,855Violent Language 102
College Sports14.6 per 1,000 · 1,949
Band 84Conference Realignment 47NIL 737Recruiting 581Student Section 21Transfer Portal 551
Off-Field Storylines29.2 per 1,000 · 3,900
Broadcast & Media 806Injuries 978Officiating 1,956Player Conduct 138Politics & Activism 56
Sports Betting3.3 per 1,000 · 437
Gambling 379Moneyline 17Parlay 10Prop Bet 31
Team & Front Office164.1 per 1,000 · 21,948
Coaching 12,590Crowd & Attendance 708Front Office 276Opponent Hostility 7,247Opponent Respect 972Athletic Department 22Stadium Experience 527

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

98th percentile
6,987 explicit comments52.2 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words5,855
  • Explicit Acronym1,089
  • Explicit Emoji189
  • Violent Language102

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 52.2 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 3rd of 100 nationally, the 98th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 76.4116 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 13)WLWWWLWWWWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2388.9No game
2025-08-3073.2W 34–17 vs New Mexico
2025-09-0683L 13–24 at Oklahoma
2025-09-1392.8W 63–3 vs Central Michigan
2025-09-2079.1W 30–27 at Nebraska
2025-09-2749.5No game
2025-10-0463.9W 24–10 vs Wisconsin
2025-10-1198.2L 13–31 at USC
2025-10-1859.7W 24–7 vs Washington
2025-10-2554.6W 31–20 at Michigan State
2025-11-0173.1W 21–16 vs Purdue
2025-11-0859.4No game
2025-11-1556W 24–22 at Northwestern
2025-11-2249.8W 45–20 at Maryland
2025-11-2977.5L 9–27 vs Ohio State
2025-12-06111.9No game
2025-12-13116No game
2025-12-2091.2No game
2025-12-2790L 27–41 vs Texas
2026-01-0378.8No game
2026-01-1061.7No game
2026-01-17109.2No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 116 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 13)) against a season average of 76.4 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks7,717
  • Sexual Content502
  • Group Hate425
  • Harm Wish89
  • Violent Threat27
  • Death Threat4
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender513
  • Physical Appearance404
  • Disability366
  • Age249
  • LGBTQIA+225
  • Race142
  • Religion35

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Phenomenal story, well done Ed! 🏈

positiveFacebook

Gone way too soon ! Leadership!

positiveFacebook

I’m tired of Moore saying we gotta clean some things up that’s all he ever says and nothing ever changes

negativeCoachingFacebook

Moore needs to wake up. Quit doing the same shit week in and week out and saying we need to get better but I haven’t seen nothing. As always though Go Blue!

mixedExplicit WordsCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.