Miami (Ohio)

RedHawks · 7–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
789.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
1,085
2025–26 season
Positive share
79%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
13.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Miami (Ohio) fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Miami (Ohio) Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive79%857
Neutral8.7%94
Negative11.6%126
Mixed0.7%8
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 17Low: +23% · L 38–41 vs UNLVAug 28: L 0–17 at WisconsinLSep 6: L 17–45 at RutgersLSep 20: L 38–41 vs UNLVLSep 27: W 38–0 vs LindenwoodWOct 4: W 25–14 at Northern IllinoisWOct 11: W 20–7 at AkronWOct 18: W 44–30 vs Eastern MichiganWOct 25: W 26–17 vs Western MichiganWNov 4: L 20–24 at OhioLNov 12: L 3–24 vs ToledoLNov 19: W 37–20 at BuffaloWNov 29: W 45–24 vs Ball StateWDec 6: L 13–23 vs Western MichiganLDec 27: L 3–18 vs Fresno StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+79%58468L 0–17 at Wisconsin
2025-08-30+24%12721No game
2025-09-06+59%21429L 17–45 at Rutgers
2025-09-13+69%10113No game
2025-09-20+23%16931L 38–41 vs UNLV
2025-09-27+83%26130W 38–0 vs Lindenwood
2025-10-04+92%79284W 25–14 at Northern Illinois
2025-10-11+89%48153W 20–7 at Akron
2025-10-18+81%26032W 44–30 vs Eastern Michigan
2025-10-25+79%895107W 26–17 vs Western Michigan
2025-11-01+36%371658L 20–24 at Ohio
2025-11-08+41%28946L 3–24 vs Toledo
2025-11-15+82%1249140W 37–20 at Buffalo
2025-11-22+82%35339No game
2025-11-29+74%10411125W 45–24 vs Ball State
2025-12-06+43%491872L 13–23 vs Western Michigan
2025-12-13+73%13215No game
2025-12-20+73%29237No game
2025-12-27+33%482279L 3–18 vs Fresno State
2026-01-03No comments000No game
2026-01-10+80%405No game
2026-01-17+100%101No game
Fan mood jumped 61 points the week they beat Lindenwood by 38.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 28: L 0–17 at WisconsinLSep 6: L 17–45 at RutgersLSep 20: L 38–41 vs UNLVLSep 27: W 38–0 vs LindenwoodWOct 4: W 25–14 at Northern IllinoisWOct 11: W 20–7 at AkronWOct 18: W 44–30 vs Eastern MichiganWOct 25: W 26–17 vs Western MichiganWNov 4: L 20–24 at OhioLNov 12: L 3–24 vs ToledoLNov 19: W 37–20 at BuffaloWNov 29: W 45–24 vs Ball StateWDec 6: L 13–23 vs Western MichiganLDec 27: L 3–18 vs Fresno StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2385.3%5.9%68
2025-08-3057.1%33.3%21
2025-09-0672.4%13.8%29
2025-09-1376.9%7.7%13
2025-09-2051.6%29%31
2025-09-2786.7%3.3%30
2025-10-0494%2.4%84
2025-10-1190.6%1.9%53
2025-10-1881.3%0%32
2025-10-2583.2%4.7%107
2025-11-0163.8%27.6%58
2025-11-0860.9%19.6%46
2025-11-1588.6%6.4%140
2025-11-2289.7%7.7%39
2025-11-2983.2%8.8%125
2025-12-0668.1%25%72
2025-12-1386.7%13.3%15
2025-12-2078.4%5.4%37
2025-12-2760.8%27.8%79
2026-01-030%0%0
2026-01-1080%0%5
2026-01-17100%0%1

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm6.5 per 1,000 · 7
Personal Attacks 3Group Hate 4
Identity-Based Abuse7.4 per 1,000 · 8
Race 7Gender 1
Explicit Language1.8 per 1,000 · 2
Explicit Words 2
College Sports8.3 per 1,000 · 9
Conference Realignment 2Transfer Portal 3NIL 1Band 2Recruiting 1
Off-Field Storylines34.1 per 1,000 · 37
Broadcast & Media 26Injuries 3Officiating 6Player Conduct 3
Sports Betting0.9 per 1,000 · 1
Gambling 1
Team & Front Office49.8 per 1,000 · 54
Coaching 23Opponent Hostility 8Opponent Respect 4Crowd & Attendance 16Stadium Experience 4

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

2 explicit comments1.8 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 1.8 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 13.866.7 per 1,000 · W 38–0 vs LindenwoodLLLWWWWWLLWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230L 0–17 at Wisconsin
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-060L 17–45 at Rutgers
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-200L 38–41 vs UNLV
2025-09-2766.7W 38–0 vs Lindenwood
2025-10-040W 25–14 at Northern Illinois
2025-10-110W 20–7 at Akron
2025-10-1831.3W 44–30 vs Eastern Michigan
2025-10-259.3W 26–17 vs Western Michigan
2025-11-010L 20–24 at Ohio
2025-11-080L 3–24 vs Toledo
2025-11-1521.4W 37–20 at Buffalo
2025-11-2225.6No game
2025-11-298W 45–24 vs Ball State
2025-12-0627.8L 13–23 vs Western Michigan
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-2054.1No game
2025-12-2725.3L 3–18 vs Fresno State
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 66.7 per 1,000 comments (W 38–0 vs Lindenwood) against a season average of 13.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Group Hate4
  • Personal Attacks3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Race7
  • Gender1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

You got this, RedHawks! 🥹

positiveFacebook

Crazy introduction to college football. 0-6 to 6-6 who wouldve ever thought

positiveFacebook

Co? Are you kidding me? The Polish Prince is THE Player!

negativeFacebook

Glad we qualified but these 70 bowls are mostly meaningless cash cows.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.