Wyoming

Cowboys · 4–8 in 2025–26

Fan Score
571.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
7,961
2025–26 season
Positive share
57.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
17.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Wyoming fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 5th percentile · Harm: 26th percentile · Team & Front Office: 70th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Wyoming Harm: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wyoming Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Wyoming Explicit Language: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wyoming College Sports: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wyoming Off-Field Storylines: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wyoming Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Wyoming Team & Front Office: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive57.2%4,551
Neutral11.6%926
Negative29.3%2,334
Mixed1.9%150

Signature subtags

What Wyoming fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
2.3×

Mentioned Front Office at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.7 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.7×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

20.2 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.7×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 17Low: −25% · L 7–27 at HawaiiAug 28: W 10–0 at AkronWSep 6: W 31–7 vs Northern IowaWSep 13: L 6–31 vs UtahLSep 20: L 20–37 at ColoradoLOct 4: L 17–31 vs UNLVLOct 11: W 35–28 vs San Jose StateWOct 18: L 21–24 at Air ForceLOct 25: W 28–0 vs Colorado StateWNov 1: L 7–24 at San Diego StateLNov 15: L 3–24 at Fresno StateLNov 22: L 7–13 vs NevadaLNov 29: L 7–27 at HawaiiLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+54%488122675W 10–0 at Akron
2025-08-30+50%31477473No game
2025-09-06+63%35448488W 31–7 vs Northern Iowa
2025-09-13+31%302141512L 6–31 vs Utah
2025-09-20−13%204279558L 20–37 at Colorado
2025-09-27+63%59979No game
2025-10-04−18%164253504L 17–31 vs UNLV
2025-10-11+60%46787630W 35–28 vs San Jose State
2025-10-18−2%315328764L 21–24 at Air Force
2025-10-25+71%59959756W 28–0 vs Colorado State
2025-11-01+16%12586239L 7–24 at San Diego State
2025-11-08+30%22846No game
2025-11-15+10%221178447L 3–24 at Fresno State
2025-11-22+25%472259838L 7–13 vs Nevada
2025-11-29−25%165296524L 7–27 at Hawaii
2025-12-06−6%7485170No game
2025-12-13+43%15523No game
2025-12-20+57%24435No game
2025-12-27+56%9016No game
2026-01-03+81%62472No game
2026-01-10+78%856101No game
2026-01-17+100%11011No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week they lost by 20 at Hawaii, gaining 82 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 28: W 10–0 at AkronWSep 6: W 31–7 vs Northern IowaWSep 13: L 6–31 vs UtahLSep 20: L 20–37 at ColoradoLOct 4: L 17–31 vs UNLVLOct 11: W 35–28 vs San Jose StateWOct 18: L 21–24 at Air ForceLOct 25: W 28–0 vs Colorado StateWNov 1: L 7–24 at San Diego StateLNov 15: L 3–24 at Fresno StateLNov 22: L 7–13 vs NevadaLNov 29: L 7–27 at HawaiiLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2372.3%18.1%675
2025-08-3066.4%16.3%473
2025-09-0672.5%9.8%488
2025-09-1359%27.5%512
2025-09-2036.6%50%558
2025-09-2774.7%11.4%79
2025-10-0432.5%50.2%504
2025-10-1174.1%13.8%630
2025-10-1841.2%42.9%764
2025-10-2579.2%7.8%756
2025-11-0152.3%36%239
2025-11-0847.8%17.4%46
2025-11-1549.4%39.8%447
2025-11-2256.3%30.9%838
2025-11-2931.5%56.5%524
2025-12-0643.5%50%170
2025-12-1365.2%21.7%23
2025-12-2068.6%11.4%35
2025-12-2756.3%0%16
2026-01-0386.1%5.6%72
2026-01-1084.2%5.9%101
2026-01-17100%0%11

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm15.5 per 1,000 · 123
Personal Attacks 118Group Hate 3Harm Wish 2
Identity-Based Abuse2.3 per 1,000 · 18
Disability 3Physical Appearance 6Religion 4Race 1Age 2Gender 1LGBTQIA+ 1
Explicit Language4.4 per 1,000 · 35
Explicit Acronym 20Explicit Words 11Explicit Emoji 3Violent Language 2
College Sports18 per 1,000 · 143
Recruiting 38NIL 45Band 7Conference Realignment 26Transfer Portal 41Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines31.2 per 1,000 · 248
Officiating 46Broadcast & Media 161Politics & Activism 6Injuries 35Player Conduct 2
Sports Betting3 per 1,000 · 24
Gambling 23Prop Bet 1
Team & Front Office151.1 per 1,000 · 1,203
Coaching 958Crowd & Attendance 70Stadium Experience 32Opponent Hostility 93Front Office 61Opponent Respect 21Athletic Department 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

5th percentile
35 explicit comments4.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym20
  • Explicit Words11
  • Explicit Emoji3
  • Violent Language2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 4.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 96th of 100 nationally, the 5th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 17.735.3 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)WWLLLWLWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-235.9W 10–0 at Akron
2025-08-3014.8No game
2025-09-068.2W 31–7 vs Northern Iowa
2025-09-139.8L 6–31 vs Utah
2025-09-2030.5L 20–37 at Colorado
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-0417.9L 17–31 vs UNLV
2025-10-1117.5W 35–28 vs San Jose State
2025-10-1828.8L 21–24 at Air Force
2025-10-250W 28–0 vs Colorado State
2025-11-0120.9L 7–24 at San Diego State
2025-11-080No game
2025-11-1526.8L 3–24 at Fresno State
2025-11-2222.7L 7–13 vs Nevada
2025-11-2932.4L 7–27 at Hawaii
2025-12-0635.3No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0327.8No game
2026-01-109.9No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 35.3 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 17.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks118
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance6
  • Religion4
  • Disability3
  • Age2
  • Gender1
  • LGBTQIA+1
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

COWBOY TOUGH...GO FOR THE WIN!!

positiveFacebook

We welcome Justin with open arms. Good luck in the brown and gold Wyoming uniform. Go Pokes!

positiveFacebook

or at least a full four quarters of play

negativeFacebook

Hope it's not HIM from the new Horror movie. And Svoboda likes giving the ball to the other team. Or helping them out in some way

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.