Sence
Sence Fan Index
College Football
SEC

Texas A&M

Aggies · 11–2 in 2025–26

Compare Texas A&M with…
Fan Score
541.6
positive per 1,000 comments

Texas A&M ranks 83rd of 120 ranked FBS teams for Fan Score.

Comments analyzed
64,787
2025–26 season

Texas A&M ranks 8th of 138 ranked FBS teams for Comment volume.

Positive share
54.2%
of all fan comments

Texas A&M ranks 83rd of 120 ranked FBS teams for Positive share.

Toxicity
53.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better

Texas A&M sits in the 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams for Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000, where a lower rate is the better outcome.

Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Texas A&M fans raise more than the average fanbase.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Identity-Based Abuse: 93rd percentile · College Sports: 15th percentile · Explicit Language: 83rd percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Texas A&M Harm: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M Identity-Based Abuse: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M Explicit Language: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M College Sports: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas A&M Team & Front Office: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive54.2%35,090
Neutral10.5%6,798
Negative33.6%21,784
Mixed1.7%1,115

Signature subtags

What Texas A&M fans bring up more than the average classified fanbase, across all 138 FBS fanbases. Harm and identity-based abuse are left out here; they sit in this team’s own moderation snapshot.

Team & Front Office
2.3×

Mentioned Opponent Hostility at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

64.5 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
2.1×

Mentioned Student Section at 2.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.5 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.8×

Mentioned Band at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+70%+35%−35%−70%0%Peak: +64% · W 38–17 at MissouriLow: −32% · L 3–10 vs MiamiAug 30: W 42–24 vs UTSAWSep 6: W 44–22 vs Utah StateWSep 13: W 41–40 at Notre DameWSep 27: W 16–10 vs AuburnWOct 4: W 31–9 vs Mississippi StateWOct 11: W 34–17 vs FloridaWOct 18: W 45–42 at ArkansasWOct 25: W 49–25 at LSUWNov 8: W 38–17 at MissouriWNov 15: W 31–30 vs South CarolinaWNov 22: W 48–0 vs SamfordWNov 28: L 17–27 at TexasLDec 20: L 3–10 vs MiamiLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+14%303220587No game
2025-08-30+5%6095421,355W 42–24 vs UTSA
2025-09-06+27%479249843W 44–22 vs Utah State
2025-09-13+58%1,9594182,640W 41–40 at Notre Dame
2025-09-20+48%564143876No game
2025-09-27+26%8734581,571W 16–10 vs Auburn
2025-10-04+32%1,7057822,909W 31–9 vs Mississippi State
2025-10-11+44%1,7075662,595W 34–17 vs Florida
2025-10-18+15%1,6151,1213,194W 45–42 at Arkansas
2025-10-25+49%4,7361,3856,777W 49–25 at LSU
2025-11-01+49%424101658No game
2025-11-08+64%2,9525023,854W 38–17 at Missouri
2025-11-15+28%5,5512,8809,571W 31–30 vs South Carolina
2025-11-22+45%3,2251,0424,853W 48–0 vs Samford; L 17–27 at Texas
2025-11-29−25%3,1965,6789,825No game
2025-12-06+16%1,6801,1613,256No game
2025-12-13+37%7412941,193No game
2025-12-20−32%1,6693,5405,789L 3–10 vs Miami
2025-12-27+4%154141327No game
2026-01-03−7%391459968No game
2026-01-10+13%9363227No game
2026-01-17+46%46439919No game
Fan mood fell 70 points the week of Nov 29.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%38%77%Aug 30: W 42–24 vs UTSAWSep 6: W 44–22 vs Utah StateWSep 13: W 41–40 at Notre DameWSep 27: W 16–10 vs AuburnWOct 4: W 31–9 vs Mississippi StateWOct 11: W 34–17 vs FloridaWOct 18: W 45–42 at ArkansasWOct 25: W 49–25 at LSUWNov 8: W 38–17 at MissouriWNov 15: W 31–30 vs South CarolinaWNov 22: W 48–0 vs SamfordWNov 28: L 17–27 at TexasLDec 20: L 3–10 vs MiamiLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2351.6%37.5%587
2025-08-3044.9%40%1,355
2025-09-0656.8%29.5%843
2025-09-1374.2%15.8%2,640
2025-09-2064.4%16.3%876
2025-09-2755.6%29.2%1,571
2025-10-0458.6%26.9%2,909
2025-10-1165.8%21.8%2,595
2025-10-1850.6%35.1%3,194
2025-10-2569.9%20.4%6,777
2025-11-0164.4%15.3%658
2025-11-0876.6%13%3,854
2025-11-1558%30.1%9,571
2025-11-2266.5%21.5%4,853
2025-11-2932.5%57.8%9,825
2025-12-0651.6%35.7%3,256
2025-12-1362.1%24.6%1,193
2025-12-2028.8%61.2%5,789
2025-12-2747.1%43.1%327
2026-01-0340.4%47.4%968
2026-01-1041%27.8%227
2026-01-1750.5%4.2%919

Season timeline

  1. Aug 30W 42–24vs UTSA
  2. Sep 6W 44–22vs Utah State
  3. Sep 13W 41–40at Notre Dame
  4. Sep 27W 16–10vs Auburn
  5. Oct 4W 31–9vs Mississippi State
  6. Oct 11W 34–17vs Florida
  7. Oct 18W 45–42at Arkansas
  8. Oct 25W 49–25at LSU
  9. Nov 8W 38–17at Missouri
  10. Nov 15W 31–30vs South Carolina
  11. Nov 22W 48–0vs Samford
  12. Nov 28L 17–27at Texas
  13. Dec 20L 3–10vs Miami
Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm42.3 per 1,000 · 2,743
Group Hate 202Harm Wish 52Personal Attacks 2,478Sexual Content 104Violent Threat 14
Identity-Based Abuse11.3 per 1,000 · 733
Disability 81Age 46Gender 150LGBTQIA+ 178Physical Appearance 270Race 29Religion 12
Explicit Language35.9 per 1,000 · 2,324
Explicit Acronym 321Explicit Emoji 59Explicit Words 1,941Violent Language 66
College Sports9.2 per 1,000 · 598
Band 149Conference Realignment 57NIL 78Recruiting 135Student Section 98Transfer Portal 90
Off-Field Storylines31.8 per 1,000 · 2,059
Broadcast & Media 898Injuries 357Officiating 773Player Conduct 34Politics & Activism 14
Sports Betting2.8 per 1,000 · 181
Gambling 154Moneyline 10Parlay 5Prop Bet 13
Team & Front Office141.5 per 1,000 · 9,168
Coaching 3,264Crowd & Attendance 1,115Front Office 86Opponent Hostility 4,179Opponent Respect 453Athletic Department 8Stadium Experience 313

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

83rd percentile
2,324 explicit comments35.9 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words1,941
  • Explicit Acronym321
  • Violent Language66
  • Explicit Emoji59

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 35.9 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 18th of 100 nationally, the 83rd percentile.

How toxic is the Texas A&M fanbase?

Over the 2025–26 season, Texas A&M’s comment section ran at 53.7 harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, putting the fanbase in the 83rd percentile of ranked FBS fanbases; on this measure a lower rate is the better outcome.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 53.7180.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Aug 23)WWWWWWWWWWWLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-23180.6No game
2025-08-3054.6W 42–24 vs UTSA
2025-09-0685.4W 44–22 vs Utah State
2025-09-1323.1W 41–40 at Notre Dame
2025-09-2026.3No game
2025-09-2731.2W 16–10 vs Auburn
2025-10-0428.2W 31–9 vs Mississippi State
2025-10-1140.1W 34–17 vs Florida
2025-10-1824.1W 45–42 at Arkansas
2025-10-2533.1W 49–25 at LSU
2025-11-0127.4No game
2025-11-0816.9W 38–17 at Missouri
2025-11-1536.8W 31–30 vs South Carolina
2025-11-2236.7W 48–0 vs Samford; L 17–27 at Texas
2025-11-29108.5No game
2025-12-0666.6No game
2025-12-1349.5No game
2025-12-2080.5L 3–10 vs Miami
2025-12-2785.6No game
2026-01-03139.5No game
2026-01-1061.7No game
2026-01-176.5No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 180.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Aug 23)) against a season average of 53.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2,478
  • Group Hate202
  • Sexual Content104
  • Harm Wish52
  • Violent Threat14
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance270
  • LGBTQIA+178
  • Gender150
  • Disability81
  • Age46
  • Race29
  • Religion12

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

“Corps. Great to see Coach Elko at this event!”

positiveFacebook

“I met Chet in 1983-1984 school years! He was one of a kind! Gigantic Guy!”

positiveFacebook

“Walking like a constipated 👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼”

negativeFacebook

“Way to frickin close!! And why would you guys do that to us?!?!?!? Anyways GIG”EM”

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.

See Sence on your communityAbout the data