Cincinnati

Bearcats · 7–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
535.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
12,753
2025–26 season
Positive share
53.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
40.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Cincinnati fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 17th percentile · Sports Betting: 17th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 82nd percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Cincinnati Harm: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati Explicit Language: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati College Sports: 57th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati Off-Field Storylines: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati Sports Betting: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Cincinnati Team & Front Office: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive53.5%6,828
Neutral11.6%1,479
Negative33%4,212
Mixed1.8%234

Signature subtags

What Cincinnati fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
3.4×

Mentioned Student Section at 3.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.4 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.3×

Mentioned Front Office at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.8 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.8×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

20.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+70%+35%−35%−70%0%Peak: +61% · W 37–34 at KansasLow: −46% · week of Jan 3Aug 28: L 17–20 vs NebraskaLSep 6: W 34–20 vs Bowling GreenWSep 13: W 70–0 vs N'Western StWSep 27: W 37–34 at KansasWOct 4: W 38–30 vs Iowa StateWOct 11: W 20–11 vs UCFWOct 18: W 49–17 at Oklahoma StateWOct 25: W 41–20 vs BaylorWNov 1: L 14–45 at UtahLNov 15: L 24–30 vs ArizonaLNov 22: L 14–26 vs BYULNov 29: L 23–45 at TCULJan 2: L 13–35 vs NavyLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23−1%4594701,124L 17–20 vs Nebraska
2025-08-30−11%79103214No game
2025-09-06+46%27292395W 34–20 vs Bowling Green
2025-09-13+22%194115365W 70–0 vs N'Western St
2025-09-20+8%5748115No game
2025-09-27+61%57098775W 37–34 at Kansas
2025-10-04+38%7352821,183W 38–30 vs Iowa State
2025-10-11+49%511138762W 20–11 vs UCF
2025-10-18+61%66090941W 49–17 at Oklahoma State
2025-10-25+39%9253441,476W 41–20 vs Baylor
2025-11-01+7%395341827L 14–45 at Utah
2025-11-08+52%12130175No game
2025-11-15−21%188302538L 24–30 vs Arizona
2025-11-22−19%293448834L 14–26 vs BYU
2025-11-29−33%230496807L 23–45 at TCU
2025-12-06+13%192140390No game
2025-12-13+42%11137178No game
2025-12-20+15%7955156No game
2025-12-27+42%328119493L 13–35 vs Navy
2026-01-03−46%116355523No game
2026-01-10+57%24558329No game
2026-01-17+11%6851153No game
Fan mood jumped 103 points the week of Jan 10.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%75%Aug 28: L 17–20 vs NebraskaLSep 6: W 34–20 vs Bowling GreenWSep 13: W 70–0 vs N'Western StWSep 27: W 37–34 at KansasWOct 4: W 38–30 vs Iowa StateWOct 11: W 20–11 vs UCFWOct 18: W 49–17 at Oklahoma StateWOct 25: W 41–20 vs BaylorWNov 1: L 14–45 at UtahLNov 15: L 24–30 vs ArizonaLNov 22: L 14–26 vs BYULNov 29: L 23–45 at TCULJan 2: L 13–35 vs NavyLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2340.8%41.8%1,124
2025-08-3036.9%48.1%214
2025-09-0668.9%23.3%395
2025-09-1353.2%31.5%365
2025-09-2049.6%41.7%115
2025-09-2773.5%12.6%775
2025-10-0462.1%23.8%1,183
2025-10-1167.1%18.1%762
2025-10-1870.1%9.6%941
2025-10-2562.7%23.3%1,476
2025-11-0147.8%41.2%827
2025-11-0869.1%17.1%175
2025-11-1534.9%56.1%538
2025-11-2235.1%53.7%834
2025-11-2928.5%61.5%807
2025-12-0649.2%35.9%390
2025-12-1362.4%20.8%178
2025-12-2050.6%35.3%156
2025-12-2766.5%24.1%493
2026-01-0322.2%67.9%523
2026-01-1074.5%17.6%329
2026-01-1744.4%33.3%153

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm33.6 per 1,000 · 429
Personal Attacks 402Sexual Content 14Group Hate 20Harm Wish 3
Identity-Based Abuse7.1 per 1,000 · 91
Gender 17Physical Appearance 42Religion 7Age 8LGBTQIA+ 2Race 5Disability 11
Explicit Language7.4 per 1,000 · 95
Explicit Words 55Explicit Acronym 34Explicit Emoji 5Violent Language 1
College Sports17.6 per 1,000 · 224
NIL 50Band 10Student Section 31Recruiting 48Transfer Portal 83Conference Realignment 22
Off-Field Storylines37.7 per 1,000 · 481
Officiating 161Injuries 53Broadcast & Media 265Player Conduct 3Politics & Activism 1
Sports Betting2.3 per 1,000 · 29
Gambling 23Moneyline 4Prop Bet 2
Team & Front Office126.8 per 1,000 · 1,617
Coaching 1,141Opponent Respect 61Front Office 100Crowd & Attendance 166Opponent Hostility 108Stadium Experience 85Athletic Department 8

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

17th percentile
95 explicit comments7.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words55
  • Explicit Acronym34
  • Explicit Emoji5
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 7.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 84th of 100 nationally, the 17th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 40.8107.5 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Aug 30)LWWWWWWWLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2368.5L 17–20 vs Nebraska
2025-08-30107.5No game
2025-09-0617.7W 34–20 vs Bowling Green
2025-09-1327.4W 70–0 vs N'Western St
2025-09-2060.9No game
2025-09-2721.9W 37–34 at Kansas
2025-10-0428.7W 38–30 vs Iowa State
2025-10-119.2W 20–11 vs UCF
2025-10-1817W 49–17 at Oklahoma State
2025-10-2571.1W 41–20 vs Baylor
2025-11-0129L 14–45 at Utah
2025-11-0817.1No game
2025-11-1559.5L 24–30 vs Arizona
2025-11-2252.8L 14–26 vs BYU
2025-11-2943.4L 23–45 at TCU
2025-12-0620.5No game
2025-12-1328.1No game
2025-12-2012.8No game
2025-12-2722.3L 13–35 vs Navy
2026-01-0370.7No game
2026-01-1039.5No game
2026-01-1719.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 107.5 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Aug 30)) against a season average of 40.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks402
  • Group Hate20
  • Sexual Content14
  • Harm Wish3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance42
  • Gender17
  • Disability11
  • Age8
  • Religion7
  • Race5
  • LGBTQIA+2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Love seeing player come back to visit. It's wonderful to witness the Bearcats' growth and development as athletes . GO BEARCATS ❤️🖤🏈

positiveFacebook

BGIII is a hard worker, tall, talented, smart, strong, give him a chance

positiveFacebook

We're all Bearcaty in Cincinnati over our mediocre team........Will Satterfield be fired after a 7-5 season?

negativeCoachingFacebook

This has been an AMAZING season!!’ Love these guys! Just don’t love this color combo…. Go Cats!!!

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.