Sence
Sence Fan Index
College Football
SEC

Georgia

Bulldogs · 12–2 in 2025–26

Compare Georgia with…
Fan Score
669.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
38,740
2025–26 season
Positive share
67%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
38.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Georgia fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 2nd percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 74th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 30th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Harm: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Identity-Based Abuse: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Explicit Language: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia College Sports: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Off-Field Storylines: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Sports Betting: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Team & Front Office: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive67%25,952
Neutral6.5%2,506
Negative25.3%9,797
Mixed1.3%485

Signature subtags

What Georgia fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
1.4×

Mentioned Officiating at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.6 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
1.3×

Mentioned Violent Language at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

0.8 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
1.1×

Mentioned Explicit Words at 1.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

25.1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +89% · week of Oct 25Low: −3% · W 28–6 vs Austin PeayAug 30: W 45–7 vs MarshallWSep 6: W 28–6 vs Austin PeayWSep 13: W 44–41 (OT) at TennesseeWSep 27: L 21–24 vs AlabamaLOct 4: W 35–14 vs KentuckyWOct 11: W 20–10 at AuburnWOct 18: W 43–35 vs Ole MissWNov 1: W 24–20 vs FloridaWNov 8: W 41–21 at Mississippi StateWNov 15: W 35–10 vs TexasWNov 22: W 35–3 vs CharlotteWNov 28: W 16–9 vs Georgia TechWDec 6: W 28–7 vs AlabamaWJan 1: L 34–39 vs Ole MissLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+73%50158610No game
2025-08-30+65%1,1371921,445W 45–7 vs Marshall
2025-09-06−3%1,0091,0732,428W 28–6 vs Austin Peay
2025-09-13+39%2,3309683,523W 44–41 (OT) at Tennessee
2025-09-20+73%30534373No game
2025-09-27−2%1,2611,3252,880L 21–24 vs Alabama
2025-10-04+66%22734294W 35–14 vs Kentucky
2025-10-11−2%1,3171,3622,922W 20–10 at Auburn
2025-10-18+35%1,2545711,950W 43–35 vs Ole Miss
2025-10-25+89%40417435No game
2025-11-01+29%1,2306312,033W 24–20 vs Florida
2025-11-08+68%1,3091981,626W 41–21 at Mississippi State
2025-11-15+72%2,1103002,529W 35–10 vs Texas
2025-11-22+64%1,5442881,960W 35–3 vs Charlotte; W 16–9 vs Georgia Tech
2025-11-29+46%1,8546072,707No game
2025-12-06+68%3,7705864,675W 28–7 vs Alabama
2025-12-13+82%71949813No game
2025-12-20+80%1,2081011,387No game
2025-12-27+21%1,7551,1053,043L 34–39 vs Ole Miss
2026-01-03+21%7045119No game
2026-01-10+71%41757508No game
2026-01-17+5%221196480No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they beat Auburn by 10, gaining 91 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%46%93%Aug 30: W 45–7 vs MarshallWSep 6: W 28–6 vs Austin PeayWSep 13: W 44–41 (OT) at TennesseeWSep 27: L 21–24 vs AlabamaLOct 4: W 35–14 vs KentuckyWOct 11: W 20–10 at AuburnWOct 18: W 43–35 vs Ole MissWNov 1: W 24–20 vs FloridaWNov 8: W 41–21 at Mississippi StateWNov 15: W 35–10 vs TexasWNov 22: W 35–3 vs CharlotteWNov 28: W 16–9 vs Georgia TechWDec 6: W 28–7 vs AlabamaWJan 1: L 34–39 vs Ole MissLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2382.1%9.5%610
2025-08-3078.7%13.3%1,445
2025-09-0641.6%44.2%2,428
2025-09-1366.1%27.5%3,523
2025-09-2081.8%9.1%373
2025-09-2743.8%46%2,880
2025-10-0477.2%11.6%294
2025-10-1145.1%46.6%2,922
2025-10-1864.3%29.3%1,950
2025-10-2592.9%3.9%435
2025-11-0160.5%31%2,033
2025-11-0880.5%12.2%1,626
2025-11-1583.4%11.9%2,529
2025-11-2278.8%14.7%1,960
2025-11-2968.5%22.4%2,707
2025-12-0680.6%12.5%4,675
2025-12-1388.4%6%813
2025-12-2087.1%7.3%1,387
2025-12-2757.7%36.3%3,043
2026-01-0358.8%37.8%119
2026-01-1082.1%11.2%508
2026-01-1746%40.8%480

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments 2 times this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

  1. Aug 30W 45–7vs Marshall
  2. Sep 6W 28–6vs Austin Peay
  3. Sep 13W 44–41at Tennessee (OT)
  4. Sep 27L 21–24vs Alabama
  5. Oct 4W 35–14vs Kentucky
  6. Oct 11W 20–10at Auburn
  7. Oct 18W 43–35vs Ole Miss
  8. Nov 1W 24–20vs FloridaNeutral
  9. Nov 8W 41–21at Mississippi State
  10. Nov 15W 35–10vs Texas
  11. Nov 22W 35–3vs Charlotte
  12. Nov 28W 16–9vs Georgia TechNeutral
  13. Dec 6W 28–7vs AlabamaNeutral
  14. Jan 1L 34–39vs Ole MissNeutral
Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm33.1 per 1,000 · 1,283
Personal Attacks 1,217Group Hate 44Sexual Content 43Harm Wish 24Violent Threat 4
Identity-Based Abuse5.3 per 1,000 · 207
Race 12Age 20Physical Appearance 53Gender 55Disability 54LGBTQIA+ 12Religion 5
Explicit Language29.9 per 1,000 · 1,158
Explicit Words 972Explicit Emoji 24Violent Language 30Explicit Acronym 160
College Sports4.2 per 1,000 · 164
Band 12Recruiting 87Transfer Portal 34NIL 33Conference Realignment 4Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines34.4 per 1,000 · 1,332
Officiating 681Broadcast & Media 460Injuries 180Politics & Activism 9Player Conduct 13
Sports Betting2.9 per 1,000 · 112
Gambling 92Prop Bet 10Moneyline 6Parlay 4
Team & Front Office129.2 per 1,000 · 5,007
Coaching 3,514Crowd & Attendance 142Stadium Experience 96Opponent Hostility 1,122Opponent Respect 177Front Office 16

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

70th percentile
1,158 explicit comments29.9 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words972
  • Explicit Acronym160
  • Violent Language30
  • Explicit Emoji24

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 29.9 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 31st of 100 nationally, the 70th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 38.5127.1 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWLWWWWWWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2321.3No game
2025-08-3027.7W 45–7 vs Marshall
2025-09-0661.8W 28–6 vs Austin Peay
2025-09-1337.5W 44–41 (OT) at Tennessee
2025-09-208No game
2025-09-2763.9L 21–24 vs Alabama
2025-10-0417W 35–14 vs Kentucky
2025-10-1187.6W 20–10 at Auburn
2025-10-1841.5W 43–35 vs Ole Miss
2025-10-252.3No game
2025-11-0131W 24–20 vs Florida
2025-11-0818.5W 41–21 at Mississippi State
2025-11-1527.7W 35–10 vs Texas
2025-11-2217.3W 35–3 vs Charlotte; W 16–9 vs Georgia Tech
2025-11-2938.4No game
2025-12-0616.7W 28–7 vs Alabama
2025-12-1314.8No game
2025-12-2020.9No game
2025-12-2736.8L 34–39 vs Ole Miss
2026-01-0392.4No game
2026-01-1041.3No game
2026-01-17127.1No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 127.1 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 38.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks1,217
  • Group Hate44
  • Sexual Content43
  • Harm Wish24
  • Violent Threat4
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender55
  • Disability54
  • Physical Appearance53
  • Age20
  • LGBTQIA+12
  • Race12
  • Religion5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

“Let's Fckn Go!!! #GoDawgs”

positiveExplicit WordsFacebook

“He got a mullet!!!😂😂😂😂He will fit right in”

positiveFacebook

“Who honestly cares? Does football help the needy? Nope”

negativeFacebook

“Are we sure Bobo is calling the plays today? Definitely looks like a better game plan. Now get the defense going.”

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.

See Sence on your communityAbout the data