UAB

Blazers · 4–8 in 2025–26

Compare UAB with…

Fan Score

600.8

positive per 1,000 comments

UAB ranks 61st of 120 ranked FBS teams for Fan Score.

Comments analyzed

3,196

2025–26 season

UAB ranks 106th of 138 ranked FBS teams for Comment volume.

Positive share

60.1%

of all fan comments

UAB ranks 62nd of 120 ranked FBS teams for Positive share.

Toxicity

24.1

harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better

UAB sits in the 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams for Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000, where a lower rate is the better outcome.

Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UAB fans raise more than the average fanbase.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 96th percentile · College Sports: 20th percentile · Explicit Language: 21st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.

Sentiment

Positive60.1%1,920

Neutral10.1%322

Negative27.5%879

Mixed2.3%75

Signature subtags

What UAB fans bring up more than the average classified fanbase, across all 138 FBS fanbases. Harm and identity-based abuse are left out here; they sit in this team’s own moderation snapshot.

Team & Front Office

7.1×

Mentioned Front Office at 7.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

24.1 per 1,000 comments

Team & Front Office

2.4×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

11.6 per 1,000 comments

Team & Front Office

1.9×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

164.6 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week of	Net mood	Positive	Negative	Comments	Games
2025-08-23	+14%	101	71	207	W 52–42 vs Alabama St
2025-08-30	+39%	22	6	41	No game
2025-09-06	+43%	36	10	60	L 24–38 at Navy
2025-09-13	+17%	35	23	70	W 31–28 vs Akron
2025-09-20	−20%	42	67	124	L 24–56 at Tennessee
2025-09-27	−12%	8	12	34	No game
2025-10-04	−53%	33	124	173	L 13–31 vs Army
2025-10-11	−12%	155	210	446	L 33–53 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-18	+74%	275	30	329	W 31–24 vs Memphis
2025-10-25	+73%	26	2	33	No game
2025-11-01	+48%	59	17	87	L 19–38 at UConn
2025-11-08	+25%	59	32	107	L 17–24 at Rice
2025-11-15	+49%	79	25	111	L 24–53 vs North Texas
2025-11-22	+55%	72	15	104	L 18–48 vs South Florida
2025-11-29	+39%	282	115	430	W 31–24 at Tulsa
2025-12-06	+38%	157	61	251	No game
2025-12-13	+68%	201	31	251	No game
2025-12-20	+85%	65	2	74	No game
2025-12-27	+56%	12	3	16	No game
2026-01-03	+76%	108	10	129	No game
2026-01-10	+79%	61	4	72	No game
2026-01-17	+49%	32	9	47	No game

Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 18 to Army, gaining 127 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative

Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week of	Positive	Negative	Comments
2025-08-23	48.8%	34.3%	207
2025-08-30	53.7%	14.6%	41
2025-09-06	60%	16.7%	60
2025-09-13	50%	32.9%	70
2025-09-20	33.9%	54%	124
2025-09-27	23.5%	35.3%	34
2025-10-04	19.1%	71.7%	173
2025-10-11	34.8%	47.1%	446
2025-10-18	83.6%	9.1%	329
2025-10-25	78.8%	6.1%	33
2025-11-01	67.8%	19.5%	87
2025-11-08	55.1%	29.9%	107
2025-11-15	71.2%	22.5%	111
2025-11-22	69.2%	14.4%	104
2025-11-29	65.6%	26.7%	430
2025-12-06	62.5%	24.3%	251
2025-12-13	80.1%	12.4%	251
2025-12-20	87.8%	2.7%	74
2025-12-27	75%	18.8%	16
2026-01-03	83.7%	7.8%	129
2026-01-10	84.7%	5.6%	72
2026-01-17	68.1%	19.1%	47

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm20 per 1,000 · 64

Personal Attacks 59Sexual Content 4Group Hate 1Harm Wish 5Violent Threat 1

Identity-Based Abuse4.1 per 1,000 · 13

Physical Appearance 3Gender 5Age 3Race 1LGBTQIA+ 1Disability 1Religion 1

Explicit Language8.1 per 1,000 · 26

Explicit Words 23Explicit Acronym 1Violent Language 3

College Sports10 per 1,000 · 32

NIL 15Transfer Portal 7Recruiting 3Conference Realignment 2Band 4Student Section 2

Off-Field Storylines28.8 per 1,000 · 92

Officiating 12Broadcast & Media 52Injuries 13Player Conduct 13Politics & Activism 2

Sports Betting0.6 per 1,000 · 2

Gambling 2

Team & Front Office223.4 per 1,000 · 714

Stadium Experience 37Coaching 526Crowd & Attendance 60Front Office 77Athletic Department 9Opponent Hostility 24Opponent Respect 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

21st percentile

26 explicit comments8.1 per 1,000

Explicit Words23
Violent Language3
Explicit Acronym1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 8.1 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 80th of 100 nationally, the 21st percentile.

How toxic is the UAB fanbase?

Over the 2025–26 season, UAB’s comment section ran at 24.1 harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, putting the fanbase in the 41st percentile of ranked FBS fanbases; on this measure a lower rate is the better outcome.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week of	Rate per 1,000	Games
2025-08-23	24.2	W 52–42 vs Alabama St
2025-08-30	0	No game
2025-09-06	0	L 24–38 at Navy
2025-09-13	14.3	W 31–28 vs Akron
2025-09-20	104.8	L 24–56 at Tennessee
2025-09-27	0	No game
2025-10-04	57.8	L 13–31 vs Army
2025-10-11	40.4	L 33–53 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-18	15.2	W 31–24 vs Memphis
2025-10-25	0	No game
2025-11-01	34.5	L 19–38 at UConn
2025-11-08	9.3	L 17–24 at Rice
2025-11-15	0	L 24–53 vs North Texas
2025-11-22	48.1	L 18–48 vs South Florida
2025-11-29	9.3	W 31–24 at Tulsa
2025-12-06	27.9	No game
2025-12-13	19.9	No game
2025-12-20	0	No game
2025-12-27	0	No game
2026-01-03	0	No game
2026-01-10	0	No game
2026-01-17	0	No game

Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 104.8 per 1,000 comments (L 24–56 at Tennessee) against a season average of 24.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm

Personal Attacks59
Harm Wish5
Sexual Content4
Group Hate1
Violent Threat1

Identity-Based Abuse

Gender5
Age3
Physical Appearance3
Disability1
LGBTQIA+1
Race1
Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

“I’ll be at the UAB v Louisville soccer game. Thanks tho.”

positiveFacebook

“I will be there. Think we could get Sam to put on some breakfast?”

positiveFacebook

“Ever faithful, ever loyal, now get out! I would do mean things to get Bill Clark back.”

negativeCoachingFacebook

“Congrats to UAB. I have been a fan since my son played there. Just not Trent D.”

mixedCoachingFacebook