UAB

Blazers · 4–8 in 2025–26

Fan Score
600.8
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
3,196
2025–26 season
Positive share
60.1%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
24.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UAB fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 96th percentile · College Sports: 20th percentile · Explicit Language: 21st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UAB Harm: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UAB Explicit Language: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB College Sports: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UAB Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive60.1%1,920
Neutral10.1%322
Negative27.5%879
Mixed2.3%75

Signature subtags

What UAB fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
7.1×

Mentioned Front Office at 7.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

24.1 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.4×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

11.6 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.9×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

164.6 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +85% · week of Dec 20Low: −53% · L 13–31 vs ArmyAug 28: W 52–42 vs Alabama StWSep 6: L 24–38 at NavyLSep 13: W 31–28 vs AkronWSep 20: L 24–56 at TennesseeLOct 4: L 13–31 vs ArmyLOct 11: L 33–53 at Florida AtlanticLOct 18: W 31–24 vs MemphisWNov 1: L 19–38 at UConnLNov 8: L 17–24 at RiceLNov 15: L 24–53 vs North TexasLNov 22: L 18–48 vs South FloridaLNov 29: W 31–24 at TulsaWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+14%10171207W 52–42 vs Alabama St
2025-08-30+39%22641No game
2025-09-06+43%361060L 24–38 at Navy
2025-09-13+17%352370W 31–28 vs Akron
2025-09-20−20%4267124L 24–56 at Tennessee
2025-09-27−12%81234No game
2025-10-04−53%33124173L 13–31 vs Army
2025-10-11−12%155210446L 33–53 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-18+74%27530329W 31–24 vs Memphis
2025-10-25+73%26233No game
2025-11-01+48%591787L 19–38 at UConn
2025-11-08+25%5932107L 17–24 at Rice
2025-11-15+49%7925111L 24–53 vs North Texas
2025-11-22+55%7215104L 18–48 vs South Florida
2025-11-29+39%282115430W 31–24 at Tulsa
2025-12-06+38%15761251No game
2025-12-13+68%20131251No game
2025-12-20+85%65274No game
2025-12-27+56%12316No game
2026-01-03+76%10810129No game
2026-01-10+79%61472No game
2026-01-17+49%32947No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 18 to Army, gaining 127 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%44%88%Aug 28: W 52–42 vs Alabama StWSep 6: L 24–38 at NavyLSep 13: W 31–28 vs AkronWSep 20: L 24–56 at TennesseeLOct 4: L 13–31 vs ArmyLOct 11: L 33–53 at Florida AtlanticLOct 18: W 31–24 vs MemphisWNov 1: L 19–38 at UConnLNov 8: L 17–24 at RiceLNov 15: L 24–53 vs North TexasLNov 22: L 18–48 vs South FloridaLNov 29: W 31–24 at TulsaWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2348.8%34.3%207
2025-08-3053.7%14.6%41
2025-09-0660%16.7%60
2025-09-1350%32.9%70
2025-09-2033.9%54%124
2025-09-2723.5%35.3%34
2025-10-0419.1%71.7%173
2025-10-1134.8%47.1%446
2025-10-1883.6%9.1%329
2025-10-2578.8%6.1%33
2025-11-0167.8%19.5%87
2025-11-0855.1%29.9%107
2025-11-1571.2%22.5%111
2025-11-2269.2%14.4%104
2025-11-2965.6%26.7%430
2025-12-0662.5%24.3%251
2025-12-1380.1%12.4%251
2025-12-2087.8%2.7%74
2025-12-2775%18.8%16
2026-01-0383.7%7.8%129
2026-01-1084.7%5.6%72
2026-01-1768.1%19.1%47

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm20 per 1,000 · 64
Personal Attacks 59Sexual Content 4Group Hate 1Harm Wish 5Violent Threat 1
Identity-Based Abuse4.1 per 1,000 · 13
Physical Appearance 3Gender 5Age 3Race 1LGBTQIA+ 1Disability 1Religion 1
Explicit Language8.1 per 1,000 · 26
Explicit Words 23Explicit Acronym 1Violent Language 3
College Sports10 per 1,000 · 32
NIL 15Transfer Portal 7Recruiting 3Conference Realignment 2Band 4Student Section 2
Off-Field Storylines28.8 per 1,000 · 92
Officiating 12Broadcast & Media 52Injuries 13Player Conduct 13Politics & Activism 2
Sports Betting0.6 per 1,000 · 2
Gambling 2
Team & Front Office223.4 per 1,000 · 714
Stadium Experience 37Coaching 526Crowd & Attendance 60Front Office 77Athletic Department 9Opponent Hostility 24Opponent Respect 5

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

21st percentile
26 explicit comments8.1 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words23
  • Violent Language3
  • Explicit Acronym1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 8.1 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 80th of 100 nationally, the 21st percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 24.1104.8 per 1,000 · L 24–56 at TennesseeWLWLLLWLLLLW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2324.2W 52–42 vs Alabama St
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-060L 24–38 at Navy
2025-09-1314.3W 31–28 vs Akron
2025-09-20104.8L 24–56 at Tennessee
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-0457.8L 13–31 vs Army
2025-10-1140.4L 33–53 at Florida Atlantic
2025-10-1815.2W 31–24 vs Memphis
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-0134.5L 19–38 at UConn
2025-11-089.3L 17–24 at Rice
2025-11-150L 24–53 vs North Texas
2025-11-2248.1L 18–48 vs South Florida
2025-11-299.3W 31–24 at Tulsa
2025-12-0627.9No game
2025-12-1319.9No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 104.8 per 1,000 comments (L 24–56 at Tennessee) against a season average of 24.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks59
  • Harm Wish5
  • Sexual Content4
  • Group Hate1
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender5
  • Age3
  • Physical Appearance3
  • Disability1
  • LGBTQIA+1
  • Race1
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

I’ll be at the UAB v Louisville soccer game. Thanks tho.

positiveFacebook

I will be there. Think we could get Sam to put on some breakfast?

positiveFacebook

Ever faithful, ever loyal, now get out! I would do mean things to get Bill Clark back.

negativeCoachingFacebook

Congrats to UAB. I have been a fan since my son played there. Just not Trent D.

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.