Virginia Tech

Hokies · 3–9 in 2025–26

Fan Score
405.6
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
16,922
2025–26 season
Positive share
40.6%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
58.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Virginia Tech fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 99th percentile · Harm: 91st percentile · College Sports: 91st percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Virginia Tech Harm: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech Explicit Language: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech College Sports: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech Off-Field Storylines: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech Sports Betting: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Tech Team & Front Office: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive40.6%6,863
Neutral7.8%1,317
Negative49.5%8,378
Mixed2.2%364

Signature subtags

What Virginia Tech fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
3.3×

Mentioned Band at 3.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.3 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
3×

Mentioned Recruiting at 3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

14.1 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.9×

Mentioned Front Office at 2.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +55% · week of Nov 8Low: −58% · L 26–45 vs Old DominionAug 31: L 11–24 vs South CarolinaLSep 6: L 20–44 vs VanderbiltLSep 13: L 26–45 vs Old DominionLSep 20: W 38–6 vs WoffordWSep 27: W 23–21 at NC StateWOct 4: L 23–30 vs Wake ForestLOct 11: L 20–35 at Georgia TechLOct 24: W 42–34 (2OT) vs CaliforniaWNov 1: L 16–28 vs LouisvilleLNov 15: L 14–34 at Florida StateLNov 22: L 17–34 vs MiamiLNov 29: L 7–27 at VirginiaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+48%672097No game
2025-08-30−17%312456862L 11–24 vs South Carolina
2025-09-06−56%2431,0281,407L 20–44 vs Vanderbilt
2025-09-13−58%2601,1111,469L 26–45 vs Old Dominion
2025-09-20+22%200122354W 38–6 vs Wofford
2025-09-27+43%6942431,040W 23–21 at NC State
2025-10-04−23%177301529L 23–30 vs Wake Forest
2025-10-11−20%122191352L 20–35 at Georgia Tech
2025-10-18+51%10628154W 42–34 (2OT) vs California
2025-10-25+31%381188623No game
2025-11-01−14%149204394L 16–28 vs Louisville
2025-11-08+55%471264No game
2025-11-15−1%2,2832,3425,134L 14–34 at Florida State
2025-11-22−1%5275431,207L 17–34 vs Miami
2025-11-29−19%6259581,743L 7–27 at Virginia
2025-12-06−25%149265461No game
2025-12-13+7%6353148No game
2025-12-20+36%261142No game
2025-12-27−4%103112247No game
2026-01-03+38%8635133No game
2026-01-10−18%6095196No game
2026-01-17+46%18360266No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 19 to Old Dominion, gaining 101 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%38%76%Aug 31: L 11–24 vs South CarolinaLSep 6: L 20–44 vs VanderbiltLSep 13: L 26–45 vs Old DominionLSep 20: W 38–6 vs WoffordWSep 27: W 23–21 at NC StateWOct 4: L 23–30 vs Wake ForestLOct 11: L 20–35 at Georgia TechLOct 24: W 42–34 (2OT) vs CaliforniaWNov 1: L 16–28 vs LouisvilleLNov 15: L 14–34 at Florida StateLNov 22: L 17–34 vs MiamiLNov 29: L 7–27 at VirginiaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2369.1%20.6%97
2025-08-3036.2%52.9%862
2025-09-0617.3%73.1%1,407
2025-09-1317.7%75.6%1,469
2025-09-2056.5%34.5%354
2025-09-2766.7%23.4%1,040
2025-10-0433.5%56.9%529
2025-10-1134.7%54.3%352
2025-10-1868.8%18.2%154
2025-10-2561.2%30.2%623
2025-11-0137.8%51.8%394
2025-11-0873.4%18.8%64
2025-11-1544.5%45.6%5,134
2025-11-2243.7%45%1,207
2025-11-2935.9%55%1,743
2025-12-0632.3%57.5%461
2025-12-1342.6%35.8%148
2025-12-2061.9%26.2%42
2025-12-2741.7%45.3%247
2026-01-0364.7%26.3%133
2026-01-1030.6%48.5%196
2026-01-1768.8%22.6%266

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm50.5 per 1,000 · 854
Personal Attacks 815Group Hate 31Harm Wish 8Sexual Content 10Violent Threat 1
Identity-Based Abuse7.8 per 1,000 · 132
Gender 24Age 15Disability 29Physical Appearance 57LGBTQIA+ 5Race 4Religion 1
Explicit Language36.5 per 1,000 · 617
Explicit Words 514Explicit Emoji 17Explicit Acronym 85Violent Language 8
College Sports32.7 per 1,000 · 554
Band 73Recruiting 239NIL 119Transfer Portal 131Student Section 12Conference Realignment 22
Off-Field Storylines23 per 1,000 · 389
Injuries 49Player Conduct 22Broadcast & Media 155Officiating 165Politics & Activism 2
Sports Betting2.2 per 1,000 · 37
Moneyline 3Gambling 34
Team & Front Office242.8 per 1,000 · 4,109
Coaching 3,091Opponent Hostility 429Opponent Respect 153Crowd & Attendance 289Front Office 165Stadium Experience 101Athletic Department 17

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

84th percentile
617 explicit comments36.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words514
  • Explicit Acronym85
  • Explicit Emoji17
  • Violent Language8

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 36.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 17th of 100 nationally, the 84th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 58.3145.3 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 6)LLLWWLLWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2320.6No game
2025-08-3036L 11–24 vs South Carolina
2025-09-0639.8L 20–44 vs Vanderbilt
2025-09-1328.6L 26–45 vs Old Dominion
2025-09-2025.4W 38–6 vs Wofford
2025-09-2729.8W 23–21 at NC State
2025-10-0430.2L 23–30 vs Wake Forest
2025-10-1199.4L 20–35 at Georgia Tech
2025-10-1819.5W 42–34 (2OT) vs California
2025-10-2533.7No game
2025-11-0133L 16–28 vs Louisville
2025-11-0815.6No game
2025-11-1564.9L 14–34 at Florida State
2025-11-2262.1L 17–34 vs Miami
2025-11-2987.2L 7–27 at Virginia
2025-12-06145.3No game
2025-12-1387.8No game
2025-12-2047.6No game
2025-12-27141.7No game
2026-01-0352.6No game
2026-01-10102No game
2026-01-1782.7No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 145.3 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 6)) against a season average of 58.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks815
  • Group Hate31
  • Sexual Content10
  • Harm Wish8
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance57
  • Disability29
  • Gender24
  • Age15
  • LGBTQIA+5
  • Race4
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

What a cool event for those special kids invited to attend.

positiveFacebook

Welcome wishing you the best

positiveFacebook

Yet misses his first attempt 🤡🤦🏼‍♂️

negativeFacebook

Great hire for them but if he wants a natty he had better odds at other places.

mixedGamblingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.