Fresno State

Bulldogs · 9–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
603.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
3,370
2025–26 season
Positive share
60.3%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
23.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Fresno State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 89th percentile · College Sports: 80th percentile · Explicit Language: 73rd percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Fresno State Harm: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Fresno State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Fresno State Explicit Language: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Fresno State College Sports: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Fresno State Off-Field Storylines: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Fresno State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Fresno State Team & Front Office: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive60.3%2,033
Neutral10.5%354
Negative27.4%924
Mixed1.8%59

Signature subtags

What Fresno State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
5.2×

Mentioned Band at 5.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.8 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
2.6×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 2.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

30.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2.6×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

12.5 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 10Low: −51% · week of Oct 11Aug 23: L 7–31 at KansasLAug 30: W 42–14 vs Georgia SouthernWSep 6: W 36–27 at Oregon StateWSep 13: W 56–7 vs SouthernWSep 20: W 23–21 at HawaiiWOct 4: W 20–17 vs NevadaWOct 10: L 21–49 at Colorado StateLOct 25: L 0–23 vs San Diego StateLNov 1: W 30–7 at Boise StateWNov 15: W 24–3 vs WyomingWNov 22: L 17–28 vs Utah StateLNov 29: W 41–14 at San Jose StateWDec 27: W 18–3 vs Miami (Ohio)WAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23−7%119139286L 7–31 at Kansas
2025-08-30+46%13044186W 42–14 vs Georgia Southern
2025-09-06+49%12433187W 36–27 at Oregon State
2025-09-13+36%7430123W 56–7 vs Southern
2025-09-20+68%928124W 23–21 at Hawaii
2025-09-27+67%24430No game
2025-10-04+70%829104W 20–17 vs Nevada; L 21–49 at Colorado State
2025-10-11−51%47180262No game
2025-10-18+19%7446150No game
2025-10-25−18%67101191L 0–23 vs San Diego State
2025-11-01+61%20039262W 30–7 at Boise State
2025-11-08+18%352271No game
2025-11-15+52%13032189W 24–3 vs Wyoming
2025-11-22−28%69132225L 17–28 vs Utah State
2025-11-29+57%22147307W 41–14 at San Jose State
2025-12-06+56%691499No game
2025-12-13+67%12215No game
2025-12-20+78%13413156No game
2025-12-27+74%32029392W 18–3 vs Miami (Ohio)
2026-01-03+75%304No game
2026-01-10+100%505No game
2026-01-17+100%202No game
Fan mood fell 121 points the week of Oct 11.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 23: L 7–31 at KansasLAug 30: W 42–14 vs Georgia SouthernWSep 6: W 36–27 at Oregon StateWSep 13: W 56–7 vs SouthernWSep 20: W 23–21 at HawaiiWOct 4: W 20–17 vs NevadaWOct 10: L 21–49 at Colorado StateLOct 25: L 0–23 vs San Diego StateLNov 1: W 30–7 at Boise StateWNov 15: W 24–3 vs WyomingWNov 22: L 17–28 vs Utah StateLNov 29: W 41–14 at San Jose StateWDec 27: W 18–3 vs Miami (Ohio)WAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2341.6%48.6%286
2025-08-3069.9%23.7%186
2025-09-0666.3%17.6%187
2025-09-1360.2%24.4%123
2025-09-2074.2%6.5%124
2025-09-2780%13.3%30
2025-10-0478.8%8.7%104
2025-10-1117.9%68.7%262
2025-10-1849.3%30.7%150
2025-10-2535.1%52.9%191
2025-11-0176.3%14.9%262
2025-11-0849.3%31%71
2025-11-1568.8%16.9%189
2025-11-2230.7%58.7%225
2025-11-2972%15.3%307
2025-12-0669.7%14.1%99
2025-12-1380%13.3%15
2025-12-2085.9%8.3%156
2025-12-2781.6%7.4%392
2026-01-0375%0%4
2026-01-10100%0%5
2026-01-17100%0%2

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm20.5 per 1,000 · 69
Personal Attacks 63Group Hate 3Violent Threat 1Sexual Content 4Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse3.3 per 1,000 · 11
Disability 3Race 3Gender 1LGBTQIA+ 3Physical Appearance 1
Explicit Language32 per 1,000 · 108
Explicit Words 89Explicit Acronym 16Explicit Emoji 4
College Sports25.8 per 1,000 · 87
NIL 9Conference Realignment 13Band 23Recruiting 28Transfer Portal 15Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines40.1 per 1,000 · 135
Broadcast & Media 104Injuries 10Officiating 20Politics & Activism 3
Sports Betting2.1 per 1,000 · 7
Gambling 5Moneyline 1Parlay 1
Team & Front Office116.3 per 1,000 · 392
Coaching 219Opponent Hostility 56Opponent Respect 23Crowd & Attendance 59Stadium Experience 42Front Office 2

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

73rd percentile
108 explicit comments32 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words89
  • Explicit Acronym16
  • Explicit Emoji4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 32 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 28th of 100 nationally, the 73rd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 23.769.9 per 1,000 · L 7–31 at KansasLWWWWWLLWWLWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2369.9L 7–31 at Kansas
2025-08-3021.5W 42–14 vs Georgia Southern
2025-09-0610.7W 36–27 at Oregon State
2025-09-1324.4W 56–7 vs Southern
2025-09-200W 23–21 at Hawaii
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-040W 20–17 vs Nevada; L 21–49 at Colorado State
2025-10-1149.6No game
2025-10-186.7No game
2025-10-2531.4L 0–23 vs San Diego State
2025-11-0130.5W 30–7 at Boise State
2025-11-0814.1No game
2025-11-1521.2W 24–3 vs Wyoming
2025-11-2240L 17–28 vs Utah State
2025-11-290W 41–14 at San Jose State
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-1366.7No game
2025-12-2019.2No game
2025-12-2712.8W 18–3 vs Miami (Ohio)
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 69.9 per 1,000 comments (L 7–31 at Kansas) against a season average of 23.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks63
  • Sexual Content4
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish1
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability3
  • LGBTQIA+3
  • Race3
  • Gender1
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Go Dogs… see you in the stadium!!!

positiveFacebook

New year new Conference. PAC-12 CONFERENCE https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1AQdvyrkDx/?mibextid=wwXIfr

positiveConference RealignmentFacebook

Pics are so damn dark I can't see anything

negativeBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Go Dogs!, but we have issues right now …

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.