South Alabama

Jaguars · 4–8 in 2025–26

Fan Score
817.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
1,487
2025–26 season
Positive share
81.7%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
3.4
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects South Alabama fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • South Alabama Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • South Alabama Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive81.7%1,215
Neutral9.9%147
Negative7.9%117
Mixed0.5%8
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +91% · W 26–14 at UL MonroeLow: +0% · week of Dec 13Aug 30: W 38–21 vs Morgan StWSep 6: L 31–33 vs TulaneLSep 13: L 15–31 at AuburnLSep 20: L 20–38 vs Coastal CarolinaLSep 27: L 22–36 at North TexasLOct 4: L 24–31 (OT) at TroyLOct 14: L 14–15 vs Arkansas StateLOct 23: W 38–31 at Georgia StateWNov 1: L 22–31 vs LouisianaLNov 15: W 26–14 at UL MonroeWNov 22: W 42–35 vs Southern MissWNov 29: L 26–49 at Texas StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+71%62285No game
2025-08-30+75%14711181W 38–21 vs Morgan St
2025-09-06+87%1141130L 31–33 vs Tulane
2025-09-13+87%2045228L 15–31 at Auburn
2025-09-20+89%59363L 20–38 vs Coastal Carolina
2025-09-27+74%78894L 22–36 at North Texas
2025-10-04+62%601376L 24–31 (OT) at Troy
2025-10-11+22%362168L 14–15 vs Arkansas State
2025-10-18+70%70888W 38–31 at Georgia State
2025-10-25+69%28336No game
2025-11-01+42%15426L 22–31 vs Louisiana
2025-11-08+57%20330No game
2025-11-15+91%92398W 26–14 at UL Monroe
2025-11-22+69%10717131W 42–35 vs Southern Miss
2025-11-29+84%88797L 26–49 at Texas State
2025-12-06+69%13216No game
2025-12-13+0%001No game
2025-12-20No comments000No game
2025-12-27No comments000No game
2026-01-03+50%416No game
2026-01-10+67%516No game
2026-01-17+33%13427No game
Fan mood fell 69 points the week of Dec 13.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%47%94%Aug 30: W 38–21 vs Morgan StWSep 6: L 31–33 vs TulaneLSep 13: L 15–31 at AuburnLSep 20: L 20–38 vs Coastal CarolinaLSep 27: L 22–36 at North TexasLOct 4: L 24–31 (OT) at TroyLOct 14: L 14–15 vs Arkansas StateLOct 23: W 38–31 at Georgia StateWNov 1: L 22–31 vs LouisianaLNov 15: W 26–14 at UL MonroeWNov 22: W 42–35 vs Southern MissWNov 29: L 26–49 at Texas StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2372.9%2.4%85
2025-08-3081.2%6.1%181
2025-09-0687.7%0.8%130
2025-09-1389.5%2.2%228
2025-09-2093.7%4.8%63
2025-09-2783%8.5%94
2025-10-0478.9%17.1%76
2025-10-1152.9%30.9%68
2025-10-1879.5%9.1%88
2025-10-2577.8%8.3%36
2025-11-0157.7%15.4%26
2025-11-0866.7%10%30
2025-11-1593.9%3.1%98
2025-11-2281.7%13%131
2025-11-2990.7%7.2%97
2025-12-0681.3%12.5%16
2025-12-130%0%1
2025-12-200%0%0
2025-12-270%0%0
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%6
2026-01-1083.3%16.7%6
2026-01-1748.1%14.8%27

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm2.7 per 1,000 · 4
Personal Attacks 4Sexual Content 1
Identity-Based Abuse0.7 per 1,000 · 1
Gender 1
Explicit Language0 per 1,000 · 0
College Sports3.4 per 1,000 · 5
Band 3Transfer Portal 2
Off-Field Storylines14.1 per 1,000 · 21
Broadcast & Media 18Officiating 2Injuries 1
Sports Betting0 per 1,000 · 0
Team & Front Office52.5 per 1,000 · 78
Coaching 48Stadium Experience 10Crowd & Attendance 7Opponent Respect 5Opponent Hostility 6Front Office 2

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

0 explicit comments0 per 1,000

No explicit-language subtag classifications recorded.

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 0 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 3.437 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WLLLLLLWLWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3011W 38–21 vs Morgan St
2025-09-060L 31–33 vs Tulane
2025-09-130L 15–31 at Auburn
2025-09-200L 20–38 vs Coastal Carolina
2025-09-270L 22–36 at North Texas
2025-10-040L 24–31 (OT) at Troy
2025-10-110L 14–15 vs Arkansas State
2025-10-1822.7W 38–31 at Georgia State
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-010L 22–31 vs Louisiana
2025-11-080No game
2025-11-150W 26–14 at UL Monroe
2025-11-220W 42–35 vs Southern Miss
2025-11-290L 26–49 at Texas State
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-1737No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 37 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 3.4 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks4
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

you can do anything with the lord help so put him first and be the man you have become. love you man

positiveFacebook

South O Line has been awesome for years now. He has big shoes to fill. Keep that tradition going!

positiveCoachingFacebook

South needs a new coach and staff

negativeCoachingFacebook

Let's get another w but it probably won't happen

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.