Duke

Blue Devils · 9–5 in 2025–26

Fan Score
695.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
14,337
2025–26 season
Positive share
69.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
20.4
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Duke fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Identity-Based Abuse: 4th percentile · Team & Front Office: 11th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 76th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Duke Harm: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Duke Identity-Based Abuse: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Duke Explicit Language: 50th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Duke College Sports: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Duke Off-Field Storylines: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Duke Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Duke Team & Front Office: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive69.5%9,965
Neutral6.8%972
Negative22.2%3,188
Mixed1.5%212

Signature subtags

What Duke fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
1.7×

Mentioned Officiating at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

21.5 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
1.3×

Mentioned Explicit Emoji at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.2×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 1.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.7 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +91% · week of Dec 20Low: +1% · week of Jan 17Aug 28: W 45–17 vs ElonWSep 6: L 19–45 vs IllinoisLSep 13: L 27–34 at TulaneLSep 20: W 45–33 vs NC StateWSep 27: W 38–3 at SyracuseWOct 4: W 45–21 at CaliforniaWOct 18: L 18–27 vs Georgia TechLNov 1: W 46–45 at ClemsonWNov 8: L 34–37 at UConnLNov 15: L 17–34 vs VirginiaLNov 22: W 32–25 at North CarolinaWNov 29: W 49–32 vs Wake ForestWDec 6: W 27–20 (OT) vs VirginiaWDec 31: W 42–39 vs Arizona StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+59%40783550W 45–17 vs Elon
2025-08-30+76%22025256No game
2025-09-06+28%215113367L 19–45 vs Illinois
2025-09-13+31%11155179L 27–34 at Tulane
2025-09-20+69%61091747W 45–33 vs NC State
2025-09-27+66%610101769W 38–3 at Syracuse
2025-10-04+72%61179736W 45–21 at California
2025-10-11+80%17515200No game
2025-10-18+31%17889290L 18–27 vs Georgia Tech
2025-10-25+52%8424115No game
2025-11-01+21%9886211,774W 46–45 at Clemson
2025-11-08+22%216132387L 34–37 at UConn
2025-11-15+15%149107272L 17–34 vs Virginia
2025-11-22+56%8342031,119W 32–25 at North Carolina
2025-11-29+39%1,1904651,848W 49–32 vs Wake Forest
2025-12-06+35%1,6327312,601W 27–20 (OT) vs Virginia
2025-12-13+50%511572No game
2025-12-20+91%89197No game
2025-12-27+78%1,1621151,345W 42–39 vs Arizona State
2026-01-03+75%29628356No game
2026-01-10+28%8746147No game
2026-01-17+1%5049110No game
Fan mood fell 49 points the week they lost by 9 to Georgia Tech.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%46%92%Aug 28: W 45–17 vs ElonWSep 6: L 19–45 vs IllinoisLSep 13: L 27–34 at TulaneLSep 20: W 45–33 vs NC StateWSep 27: W 38–3 at SyracuseWOct 4: W 45–21 at CaliforniaWOct 18: L 18–27 vs Georgia TechLNov 1: W 46–45 at ClemsonWNov 8: L 34–37 at UConnLNov 15: L 17–34 vs VirginiaLNov 22: W 32–25 at North CarolinaWNov 29: W 49–32 vs Wake ForestWDec 6: W 27–20 (OT) vs VirginiaWDec 31: W 42–39 vs Arizona StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2374%15.1%550
2025-08-3085.9%9.8%256
2025-09-0658.6%30.8%367
2025-09-1362%30.7%179
2025-09-2081.7%12.2%747
2025-09-2779.3%13.1%769
2025-10-0483%10.7%736
2025-10-1187.5%7.5%200
2025-10-1861.4%30.7%290
2025-10-2573%20.9%115
2025-11-0155.7%35%1,774
2025-11-0855.8%34.1%387
2025-11-1554.8%39.3%272
2025-11-2274.5%18.1%1,119
2025-11-2964.4%25.2%1,848
2025-12-0662.7%28.1%2,601
2025-12-1370.8%20.8%72
2025-12-2091.8%1%97
2025-12-2786.4%8.6%1,345
2026-01-0383.1%7.9%356
2026-01-1059.2%31.3%147
2026-01-1745.5%44.5%110

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm17.5 per 1,000 · 251
Personal Attacks 232Group Hate 14Violent Threat 1Harm Wish 5Sexual Content 3
Identity-Based Abuse2.9 per 1,000 · 42
Gender 20LGBTQIA+ 4Physical Appearance 7Disability 6Age 3Race 2Religion 1
Explicit Language19.2 per 1,000 · 275
Explicit Acronym 61Explicit Words 207Violent Language 6Explicit Emoji 15
College Sports13.2 per 1,000 · 189
Recruiting 41NIL 50Transfer Portal 67Band 5Conference Realignment 22Student Section 7
Off-Field Storylines34.9 per 1,000 · 501
Broadcast & Media 146Officiating 308Injuries 49Player Conduct 1Politics & Activism 1
Sports Betting1.2 per 1,000 · 17
Moneyline 1Gambling 15Prop Bet 1
Team & Front Office79.2 per 1,000 · 1,136
Opponent Hostility 442Crowd & Attendance 132Stadium Experience 78Coaching 407Opponent Respect 85Front Office 15Athletic Department 3

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

50th percentile
275 explicit comments19.2 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words207
  • Explicit Acronym61
  • Explicit Emoji15
  • Violent Language6

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 19.2 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 51st of 100 nationally, the 50th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 20.490.9 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WLLWWWLWLLWWWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2310.9W 45–17 vs Elon
2025-08-303.9No game
2025-09-0635.4L 19–45 vs Illinois
2025-09-1322.3L 27–34 at Tulane
2025-09-206.7W 45–33 vs NC State
2025-09-272.6W 38–3 at Syracuse
2025-10-0414.9W 45–21 at California
2025-10-110No game
2025-10-1834.5L 18–27 vs Georgia Tech
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-0145.7W 46–45 at Clemson
2025-11-0849.1L 34–37 at UConn
2025-11-1522.1L 17–34 vs Virginia
2025-11-2218.8W 32–25 at North Carolina
2025-11-2920.6W 49–32 vs Wake Forest
2025-12-0618.5W 27–20 (OT) vs Virginia
2025-12-1369.4No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-273W 42–39 vs Arizona State
2026-01-032.8No game
2026-01-1054.4No game
2026-01-1790.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 90.9 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 20.4 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks232
  • Group Hate14
  • Harm Wish5
  • Sexual Content3
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender20
  • Physical Appearance7
  • Disability6
  • LGBTQIA+4
  • Age3
  • Race2
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Going to be a great season!!!!

positiveFacebook

Let’s offer our full support to these men that choose Duke. Together they will do great things. 🏈💙

positiveFacebook

Good luck getting trouble by ncaa

negativeFacebook

Yep. Great win when you have 6 extra players on every play!

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.