Nebraska

Cornhuskers · 7–6 in 2025–26

Fan Score
466
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
47,727
2025–26 season
Positive share
46.6%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
57.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Nebraska fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 90th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile · Harm: 85th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive46.6%22,241
Neutral8.9%4,252
Negative42.5%20,301
Mixed2%933

Signature subtags

What Nebraska fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.7×

Mentioned Band at 2.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.5 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
1.8×

Mentioned Age at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.6 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.8×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.9 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +56% · week of Sep 27Low: −52% · week of Oct 18Aug 28: W 20–17 vs CincinnatiWSep 6: W 68–0 vs AkronWSep 13: W 59–7 vs Hou ChristianWSep 20: L 27–30 vs MichiganLOct 4: W 38–27 vs Michigan StateWOct 11: W 34–31 at MarylandWOct 17: L 6–24 at MinnesotaLOct 25: W 28–21 vs NorthwesternWNov 1: L 17–21 vs USCLNov 8: W 28–21 at UCLAWNov 22: L 10–37 at Penn StateLNov 28: L 16–40 vs IowaLDec 31: L 22–44 vs UtahLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+16%2,0491,4163,984W 20–17 vs Cincinnati
2025-08-30+41%590215921No game
2025-09-06+26%1,7039133,040W 68–0 vs Akron
2025-09-13+37%1,3835692,221W 59–7 vs Hou Christian
2025-09-20−22%1,0551,7443,098L 27–30 vs Michigan
2025-09-27+56%26162353No game
2025-10-04+21%1,2657872,280W 38–27 vs Michigan State
2025-10-11+40%2,5169673,896W 34–31 at Maryland; L 6–24 at Minnesota
2025-10-18−52%6932,5523,577No game
2025-10-25+10%1,4411,1512,906W 28–21 vs Northwestern
2025-11-01−26%1,0061,8523,216L 17–21 vs USC
2025-11-08+41%2,5129483,846W 28–21 at UCLA
2025-11-15+47%364103551No game
2025-11-22−33%1,3893,0104,856L 10–37 at Penn State; L 16–40 vs Iowa
2025-11-29+26%9195091,549No game
2025-12-06−5%323363778No game
2025-12-13+11%182139375No game
2025-12-20+56%23258311No game
2025-12-27−29%1,2662,4734,196L 22–44 vs Utah
2026-01-03+23%305175566No game
2026-01-10+39%474181747No game
2026-01-17+43%313114460No game
Fan mood fell 92 points the week of Oct 18.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%75%Aug 28: W 20–17 vs CincinnatiWSep 6: W 68–0 vs AkronWSep 13: W 59–7 vs Hou ChristianWSep 20: L 27–30 vs MichiganLOct 4: W 38–27 vs Michigan StateWOct 11: W 34–31 at MarylandWOct 17: L 6–24 at MinnesotaLOct 25: W 28–21 vs NorthwesternWNov 1: L 17–21 vs USCLNov 8: W 28–21 at UCLAWNov 22: L 10–37 at Penn StateLNov 28: L 16–40 vs IowaLDec 31: L 22–44 vs UtahLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2351.4%35.5%3,984
2025-08-3064.1%23.3%921
2025-09-0656%30%3,040
2025-09-1362.3%25.6%2,221
2025-09-2034.1%56.3%3,098
2025-09-2773.9%17.6%353
2025-10-0455.5%34.5%2,280
2025-10-1164.6%24.8%3,896
2025-10-1819.4%71.3%3,577
2025-10-2549.6%39.6%2,906
2025-11-0131.3%57.6%3,216
2025-11-0865.3%24.6%3,846
2025-11-1566.1%18.7%551
2025-11-2228.6%62%4,856
2025-11-2959.3%32.9%1,549
2025-12-0641.5%46.7%778
2025-12-1348.5%37.1%375
2025-12-2074.6%18.6%311
2025-12-2730.2%58.9%4,196
2026-01-0353.9%30.9%566
2026-01-1063.5%24.2%747
2026-01-1768%24.8%460

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm46.7 per 1,000 · 2,230
Group Hate 85Harm Wish 20Personal Attacks 2,099Sexual Content 76Violent Threat 8
Identity-Based Abuse11.1 per 1,000 · 530
Disability 103Age 74Gender 133LGBTQIA+ 34Physical Appearance 160Race 29Religion 11
Explicit Language41.5 per 1,000 · 1,983
Explicit Acronym 288Explicit Emoji 20Explicit Words 1,711Violent Language 20
College Sports20.2 per 1,000 · 966
Band 166Conference Realignment 68NIL 172Recruiting 269Student Section 7Transfer Portal 330
Off-Field Storylines26.7 per 1,000 · 1,273
Broadcast & Media 475Injuries 251Officiating 542Player Conduct 6Politics & Activism 17
Sports Betting3.7 per 1,000 · 177
Gambling 153Moneyline 10Parlay 1Prop Bet 13
Team & Front Office135 per 1,000 · 6,445
Coaching 4,759Crowd & Attendance 522Front Office 112Opponent Hostility 705Opponent Respect 194Athletic Department 10Stadium Experience 229

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

90th percentile
1,983 explicit comments41.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words1,711
  • Explicit Acronym288
  • Explicit Emoji20
  • Violent Language20

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 41.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 11th of 100 nationally, the 90th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 57.8109.3 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 13)WWWLWWLWLWLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2359.2W 20–17 vs Cincinnati
2025-08-3081.4No game
2025-09-0668.4W 68–0 vs Akron
2025-09-1355.4W 59–7 vs Hou Christian
2025-09-2051L 27–30 vs Michigan
2025-09-2756.7No game
2025-10-0442.1W 38–27 vs Michigan State
2025-10-1143.9W 34–31 at Maryland; L 6–24 at Minnesota
2025-10-1871.3No game
2025-10-2554.4W 28–21 vs Northwestern
2025-11-0181.2L 17–21 vs USC
2025-11-0853.3W 28–21 at UCLA
2025-11-1521.8No game
2025-11-2246.1L 10–37 at Penn State; L 16–40 vs Iowa
2025-11-2936.8No game
2025-12-0691.3No game
2025-12-13109.3No game
2025-12-2025.7No game
2025-12-2765.5L 22–44 vs Utah
2026-01-0347.7No game
2026-01-1064.3No game
2026-01-1767.4No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 109.3 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 13)) against a season average of 57.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2,099
  • Group Hate85
  • Sexual Content76
  • Harm Wish20
  • Violent Threat8
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance160
  • Gender133
  • Disability103
  • Age74
  • LGBTQIA+34
  • Race29
  • Religion11

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

I love the T-Shirt that Coach Rhule is wearing....GO BIG RED!!!

positiveFacebook

Good luck gentlemen. GO BIG RED

positiveFacebook

Why do I only hear the Trojan anthem over and over? Im not hearing our band on TV.

negativeBroadcast & MediaFacebook

We’re gonna lose. But it’ll be fun to watch either way

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.