Oklahoma State

Cowboys · 1–11 in 2025–26

Compare Oklahoma State with…
Fan Score
489.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
25,460
2025–26 season
Positive share
48.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
62.8
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Oklahoma State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 96th percentile · Harm: 94th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 91st percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Oklahoma State Harm: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State Identity-Based Abuse: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State Explicit Language: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State College Sports: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State Off-Field Storylines: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma State Team & Front Office: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive48.9%12,460
Neutral13%3,306
Negative35.6%9,059
Mixed2.5%635

Signature subtags

What Oklahoma State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
8×

Mentioned Player Conduct at 8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4.8 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
7×

Mentioned Athletic Department at 7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.5 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
5.8×

Mentioned NIL at 5.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

22.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+50%+25%−25%−50%0%Peak: +49% · week of Dec 20Low: −16% · week of Jan 17Aug 28: W 27–7 vs UT MartinWSep 6: L 3–69 at OregonLSep 19: L 12–19 vs TulsaLSep 27: L 27–45 vs BaylorLOct 4: L 13–41 at ArizonaLOct 11: L 17–39 vs HoustonLOct 18: L 17–49 vs CincinnatiLOct 25: L 0–42 at Texas TechLNov 1: L 21–38 at KansasLNov 15: L 6–14 vs Kansas StateLNov 22: L 14–17 at UCFLNov 29: L 13–20 vs Iowa StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+23%1,4778352,762W 27–7 vs UT Martin
2025-08-30+8%5854891,228No game
2025-09-06−13%8991,3093,109L 3–69 at Oregon
2025-09-13+12%356267727L 12–19 vs Tulsa
2025-09-20−6%1,1441,3182,858No game
2025-09-27+17%7144751,379L 27–45 vs Baylor
2025-10-04+0%4334321,005L 13–41 at Arizona
2025-10-11+27%6763601,170L 17–39 vs Houston
2025-10-18+4%341309744L 17–49 vs Cincinnati
2025-10-25+5%407363869L 0–42 at Texas Tech
2025-11-01+20%314198594L 21–38 at Kansas
2025-11-08+12%230173457No game
2025-11-15+30%484238830L 6–14 vs Kansas State
2025-11-22+16%1,1878052,316L 14–17 at UCF
2025-11-29+44%578192880L 13–20 vs Iowa State
2025-12-06+44%1,2524291,889No game
2025-12-13+32%399185672No game
2025-12-20+49%10528157No game
2025-12-27+24%10560191No game
2026-01-03+18%5683691,111No game
2026-01-10+24%9253160No game
2026-01-17−16%114172352No game
Fan mood fell 41 points the week of Jan 17.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%33%67%Aug 28: W 27–7 vs UT MartinWSep 6: L 3–69 at OregonLSep 19: L 12–19 vs TulsaLSep 27: L 27–45 vs BaylorLOct 4: L 13–41 at ArizonaLOct 11: L 17–39 vs HoustonLOct 18: L 17–49 vs CincinnatiLOct 25: L 0–42 at Texas TechLNov 1: L 21–38 at KansasLNov 15: L 6–14 vs Kansas StateLNov 22: L 14–17 at UCFLNov 29: L 13–20 vs Iowa StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2353.5%30.2%2,762
2025-08-3047.6%39.8%1,228
2025-09-0628.9%42.1%3,109
2025-09-1349%36.7%727
2025-09-2040%46.1%2,858
2025-09-2751.8%34.4%1,379
2025-10-0443.1%43%1,005
2025-10-1157.8%30.8%1,170
2025-10-1845.8%41.5%744
2025-10-2546.8%41.8%869
2025-11-0152.9%33.3%594
2025-11-0850.3%37.9%457
2025-11-1558.3%28.7%830
2025-11-2251.3%34.8%2,316
2025-11-2965.7%21.8%880
2025-12-0666.3%22.7%1,889
2025-12-1359.4%27.5%672
2025-12-2066.9%17.8%157
2025-12-2755%31.4%191
2026-01-0351.1%33.2%1,111
2026-01-1057.5%33.1%160
2026-01-1732.4%48.9%352

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm51.6 per 1,000 · 1,313
Personal Attacks 1,235Sexual Content 49Violent Threat 3Group Hate 50Harm Wish 17
Identity-Based Abuse11.2 per 1,000 · 286
Disability 61LGBTQIA+ 35Gender 87Physical Appearance 57Race 16Age 45Religion 1
Explicit Language25.9 per 1,000 · 659
Explicit Words 572Explicit Acronym 92Violent Language 9Explicit Emoji 8
College Sports41.4 per 1,000 · 1,054
Band 22NIL 565Transfer Portal 283Student Section 27Recruiting 221Conference Realignment 33
Off-Field Storylines27.1 per 1,000 · 691
Player Conduct 122Broadcast & Media 340Injuries 191Officiating 23Politics & Activism 19
Sports Betting4.2 per 1,000 · 106
Gambling 94Prop Bet 10Moneyline 2
Team & Front Office156.6 per 1,000 · 3,987
Coaching 3,104Front Office 182Opponent Hostility 316Stadium Experience 91Crowd & Attendance 191Opponent Respect 79Athletic Department 90

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

59th percentile
659 explicit comments25.9 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words572
  • Explicit Acronym92
  • Violent Language9
  • Explicit Emoji8

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 25.9 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 42nd of 100 nationally, the 59th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 62.8184.7 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WLLLLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2356.5W 27–7 vs UT Martin
2025-08-3081.4No game
2025-09-0648.9L 3–69 at Oregon
2025-09-1345.4L 12–19 vs Tulsa
2025-09-2048.6No game
2025-09-2760.2L 27–45 vs Baylor
2025-10-0475.6L 13–41 at Arizona
2025-10-1180.3L 17–39 vs Houston
2025-10-18106.2L 17–49 vs Cincinnati
2025-10-25110.5L 0–42 at Texas Tech
2025-11-0133.7L 21–38 at Kansas
2025-11-08142.2No game
2025-11-1547L 6–14 vs Kansas State
2025-11-2250.1L 14–17 at UCF
2025-11-2943.2L 13–20 vs Iowa State
2025-12-0655.1No game
2025-12-1337.2No game
2025-12-2038.2No game
2025-12-2747.1No game
2026-01-0378.3No game
2026-01-10106.3No game
2026-01-17184.7No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 184.7 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 62.8 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks1,235
  • Group Hate50
  • Sexual Content49
  • Harm Wish17
  • Violent Threat3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender87
  • Disability61
  • Physical Appearance57
  • Age45
  • LGBTQIA+35
  • Race16
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

PISTOLS FIRING, GO POKES!!!

positiveFacebook

Happy belated Birthday Martin Luther King Jr.!!! 🎂 🎈 🎉

positiveFacebook

Clifford W Fager Owens So? WE were one of them. He stained our University and Football Program.

negativeFacebook

I kinda feel like Pat. I saw some good things and I saw some things I really disliked.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.