Louisiana

Ragin' Cajuns · 6–7 in 2025–26

Fan Score
687.6
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,213
2025–26 season
Positive share
68.8%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
10.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Louisiana fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 6th percentile · College Sports: 28th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 31st percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Explicit Language, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Louisiana Harm: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana College Sports: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Off-Field Storylines: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Team & Front Office: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive68.8%2,897
Neutral8.5%359
Negative21.7%915
Mixed1%42

Signature subtags

What Louisiana fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
2.8×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 2.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

13.5 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

19.7 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.1×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

12.6 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 27Low: −16% · L 10–22 vs Southern MissAug 30: L 12–14 vs RiceLSep 6: W 34–10 vs McNeeseWSep 13: L 10–52 at MissouriLSep 20: L 31–34 at Eastern MichiganLSep 27: W 54–51 (2OT) vs MarshallWOct 11: L 14–24 at James MadisonLOct 18: L 10–22 vs Southern MissLOct 25: L 23–35 at TroyLNov 1: W 31–22 at South AlabamaWNov 8: W 42–39 vs Texas StateWNov 20: W 34–30 at Arkansas StateWNov 29: W 30–27 (OT) vs UL MonroeWDec 17: L 13–20 vs DelawareLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+70%60480No game
2025-08-30−2%196205479L 12–14 vs Rice
2025-09-06+59%18237247W 34–10 vs McNeese
2025-09-13+37%7531118L 10–52 at Missouri
2025-09-20−4%8593202L 31–34 at Eastern Michigan
2025-09-27+75%36039428W 54–51 (2OT) vs Marshall
2025-10-04+96%51053No game
2025-10-11+23%6941123L 14–24 at James Madison
2025-10-18−16%6188173L 10–22 vs Southern Miss
2025-10-25−14%5778147L 23–35 at Troy
2025-11-01+77%16113193W 31–22 at South Alabama
2025-11-08+58%14533194W 42–39 vs Texas State
2025-11-15+85%28713322W 34–30 at Arkansas State
2025-11-22+95%36038No game
2025-11-29+80%68862787W 30–27 (OT) vs UL Monroe
2025-12-06+55%14431204No game
2025-12-13+9%176144353L 13–20 vs Delaware
2025-12-20+65%15220No game
2025-12-27+100%606No game
2026-01-03+100%606No game
2026-01-10+84%22125No game
2026-01-17+100%15015No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 3 at Eastern Michigan, gaining 100 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 30: L 12–14 vs RiceLSep 6: W 34–10 vs McNeeseWSep 13: L 10–52 at MissouriLSep 20: L 31–34 at Eastern MichiganLSep 27: W 54–51 (2OT) vs MarshallWOct 11: L 14–24 at James MadisonLOct 18: L 10–22 vs Southern MissLOct 25: L 23–35 at TroyLNov 1: W 31–22 at South AlabamaWNov 8: W 42–39 vs Texas StateWNov 20: W 34–30 at Arkansas StateWNov 29: W 30–27 (OT) vs UL MonroeWDec 17: L 13–20 vs DelawareLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2375%5%80
2025-08-3040.9%42.8%479
2025-09-0673.7%15%247
2025-09-1363.6%26.3%118
2025-09-2042.1%46%202
2025-09-2784.1%9.1%428
2025-10-0496.2%0%53
2025-10-1156.1%33.3%123
2025-10-1835.3%50.9%173
2025-10-2538.8%53.1%147
2025-11-0183.4%6.7%193
2025-11-0874.7%17%194
2025-11-1589.1%4%322
2025-11-2294.7%0%38
2025-11-2987.4%7.9%787
2025-12-0670.6%15.2%204
2025-12-1349.9%40.8%353
2025-12-2075%10%20
2025-12-27100%0%6
2026-01-03100%0%6
2026-01-1088%4%25
2026-01-17100%0%15

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm9 per 1,000 · 38
Personal Attacks 38Sexual Content 1
Identity-Based Abuse1.2 per 1,000 · 5
Race 2Disability 2Physical Appearance 1
Explicit Language3.1 per 1,000 · 13
Explicit Acronym 5Explicit Words 6Violent Language 2
College Sports11.9 per 1,000 · 50
NIL 11Recruiting 14Band 6Transfer Portal 8Conference Realignment 6Student Section 5
Off-Field Storylines22.8 per 1,000 · 96
Injuries 28Broadcast & Media 53Officiating 13Politics & Activism 2
Sports Betting2.6 per 1,000 · 11
Prop Bet 2Parlay 1Gambling 8
Team & Front Office106.3 per 1,000 · 448
Coaching 275Opponent Respect 10Stadium Experience 57Front Office 7Crowd & Attendance 83Opponent Hostility 32Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

13 explicit comments3.1 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words6
  • Explicit Acronym5
  • Violent Language2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 3.1 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 10.239.7 per 1,000 · L 12–14 vs RiceLWLLWLLLWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3039.7L 12–14 vs Rice
2025-09-0620.2W 34–10 vs McNeese
2025-09-130L 10–52 at Missouri
2025-09-2014.9L 31–34 at Eastern Michigan
2025-09-272.3W 54–51 (2OT) vs Marshall
2025-10-040No game
2025-10-118.1L 14–24 at James Madison
2025-10-1817.3L 10–22 vs Southern Miss
2025-10-256.8L 23–35 at Troy
2025-11-015.2W 31–22 at South Alabama
2025-11-080W 42–39 vs Texas State
2025-11-153.1W 34–30 at Arkansas State
2025-11-220No game
2025-11-292.5W 30–27 (OT) vs UL Monroe
2025-12-064.9No game
2025-12-1314.2L 13–20 vs Delaware
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 39.7 per 1,000 comments (L 12–14 vs Rice) against a season average of 10.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks38
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability2
  • Race2
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Geaux Cajuns! Go #46Bates!!

positiveFacebook

Holding it down for the Land of the Sugar 🤙🏿🤙🏿🤟🏿🤟🏿

positiveFacebook

Beat ourselves again, not pretty!!

negativeFacebook

Great win over a high school team

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.