Miami

Hurricanes · 13–3 in 2025–26

Fan Score
548.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
61,113
2025–26 season
Positive share
54.8%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
47.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Miami fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 99th percentile · College Sports: 4th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 91st percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Miami Harm: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Identity-Based Abuse: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Explicit Language: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Off-Field Storylines: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Sports Betting: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Team & Front Office: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive54.8%33,511
Neutral9%5,482
Negative34.3%20,951
Mixed1.9%1,169

Signature subtags

What Miami fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
2.3×

Mentioned Officiating at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

28 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
2×

Mentioned Explicit Words at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

45.7 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
2×

Mentioned Race at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+70%+35%−35%−70%0%Peak: +49% · week of Aug 23Low: −62% · L 20–26 (OT) at SMUAug 31: W 27–24 vs Notre DameWSep 6: W 45–3 vs BethuneWSep 13: W 49–12 vs South FloridaWSep 20: W 26–7 vs FloridaWOct 4: W 28–22 at Florida StateWOct 17: L 21–24 vs LouisvilleLOct 25: W 42–7 vs StanfordWNov 1: L 20–26 (OT) at SMULNov 8: W 38–10 vs SyracuseWNov 15: W 41–7 vs NC StateWNov 22: W 34–17 at Virginia TechWNov 29: W 38–7 at PittsburghWDec 20: W 10–3 at Texas A&MWDec 31: W 24–14 vs Ohio StateWJan 8: W 31–27 vs Ole MissWJan 19: L 21–27 at IndianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+49%25774373No game
2025-08-30+36%2,8491,1714,636W 27–24 vs Notre Dame
2025-09-06+34%7213161,180W 45–3 vs Bethune
2025-09-13+39%9243301,509W 49–12 vs South Florida
2025-09-20+15%1,3049262,523W 26–7 vs Florida
2025-09-27+47%20759313No game
2025-10-04+39%2,0036493,492W 28–22 at Florida State
2025-10-11+13%257189518L 21–24 vs Louisville
2025-10-18−46%5171,6322,400No game
2025-10-25−9%7128711,755W 42–7 vs Stanford
2025-11-01−62%5022,5283,244L 20–26 (OT) at SMU
2025-11-08−0%6456491,439W 38–10 vs Syracuse
2025-11-15+40%8033041,252W 41–7 vs NC State
2025-11-22+18%1,1037302,049W 34–17 at Virginia Tech
2025-11-29+43%1,5545592,309W 38–7 at Pittsburgh
2025-12-06+33%1,5187122,423No game
2025-12-13+31%7333521,233No game
2025-12-20+18%1,9831,3393,584W 10–3 at Texas A&M
2025-12-27+44%4,2751,4926,267W 24–14 vs Ohio State
2026-01-03+30%3,9531,9676,554W 31–27 vs Ole Miss
2026-01-10+31%1,7268242,878No game
2026-01-17+18%4,9653,2789,182L 21–27 at Indiana
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week they lost by 6 in OT at SMU, gaining 102 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%39%78%Aug 31: W 27–24 vs Notre DameWSep 6: W 45–3 vs BethuneWSep 13: W 49–12 vs South FloridaWSep 20: W 26–7 vs FloridaWOct 4: W 28–22 at Florida StateWOct 17: L 21–24 vs LouisvilleLOct 25: W 42–7 vs StanfordWNov 1: L 20–26 (OT) at SMULNov 8: W 38–10 vs SyracuseWNov 15: W 41–7 vs NC StateWNov 22: W 34–17 at Virginia TechWNov 29: W 38–7 at PittsburghWDec 20: W 10–3 at Texas A&MWDec 31: W 24–14 vs Ohio StateWJan 8: W 31–27 vs Ole MissWJan 19: L 21–27 at IndianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2368.9%19.8%373
2025-08-3061.5%25.3%4,636
2025-09-0661.1%26.8%1,180
2025-09-1361.2%21.9%1,509
2025-09-2051.7%36.7%2,523
2025-09-2766.1%18.8%313
2025-10-0457.4%18.6%3,492
2025-10-1149.6%36.5%518
2025-10-1821.5%68%2,400
2025-10-2540.6%49.6%1,755
2025-11-0115.5%77.9%3,244
2025-11-0844.8%45.1%1,439
2025-11-1564.1%24.3%1,252
2025-11-2253.8%35.6%2,049
2025-11-2967.3%24.2%2,309
2025-12-0662.6%29.4%2,423
2025-12-1359.4%28.5%1,233
2025-12-2055.3%37.4%3,584
2025-12-2768.2%23.8%6,267
2026-01-0360.3%30%6,554
2026-01-1060%28.6%2,878
2026-01-1754.1%35.7%9,182

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments 2 times this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm38.8 per 1,000 · 2,369
Death Threat 1Group Hate 152Harm Wish 62Personal Attacks 2,143Sexual Content 104Violent Threat 10
Identity-Based Abuse9.1 per 1,000 · 558
Disability 94Age 49Gender 134LGBTQIA+ 59Physical Appearance 158Race 75Religion 10
Explicit Language54.6 per 1,000 · 3,338
Explicit Acronym 517Explicit Emoji 84Explicit Words 2,795Violent Language 54
College Sports7.7 per 1,000 · 472
Band 10Conference Realignment 58NIL 129Recruiting 149Student Section 25Transfer Portal 117
Off-Field Storylines43.6 per 1,000 · 2,664
Broadcast & Media 647Injuries 253Officiating 1,712Player Conduct 63Politics & Activism 17
Sports Betting5.1 per 1,000 · 314
Gambling 254Moneyline 18Parlay 14Prop Bet 28
Team & Front Office126 per 1,000 · 7,701
Coaching 3,967Crowd & Attendance 615Front Office 63Opponent Hostility 2,388Opponent Respect 593Athletic Department 9Stadium Experience 192

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

99th percentile
3,338 explicit comments54.6 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words2,795
  • Explicit Acronym517
  • Explicit Emoji84
  • Violent Language54

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 54.6 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 2nd of 100 nationally, the 99th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 47.992.2 per 1,000 · L 20–26 (OT) at SMUWWWWWLWLWWWWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2334.9No game
2025-08-3032.1W 27–24 vs Notre Dame
2025-09-0658.5W 45–3 vs Bethune
2025-09-1322.5W 49–12 vs South Florida
2025-09-2041.6W 26–7 vs Florida
2025-09-2744.7No game
2025-10-0418.3W 28–22 at Florida State
2025-10-1130.9L 21–24 vs Louisville
2025-10-1885.8No game
2025-10-2555.8W 42–7 vs Stanford
2025-11-0192.2L 20–26 (OT) at SMU
2025-11-0841.7W 38–10 vs Syracuse
2025-11-1528.8W 41–7 vs NC State
2025-11-2235.6W 34–17 at Virginia Tech
2025-11-2932.9W 38–7 at Pittsburgh
2025-12-0645No game
2025-12-1331.6No game
2025-12-2062.5W 10–3 at Texas A&M
2025-12-2739.7W 24–14 vs Ohio State
2026-01-0342.3W 31–27 vs Ole Miss
2026-01-1045.5No game
2026-01-1763.8L 21–27 at Indiana
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 92.2 per 1,000 comments (L 20–26 (OT) at SMU) against a season average of 47.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2,143
  • Group Hate152
  • Sexual Content104
  • Harm Wish62
  • Violent Threat10
  • Death Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance158
  • Gender134
  • Disability94
  • Race75
  • LGBTQIA+59
  • Age49
  • Religion10

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Man. I hope it’s a sell out. And we represent

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

I watched at the Watsco Center with Anders.

positiveFacebook

Miami can forget the playoff picture, they don’t have a defense.

negativeFacebook

Ja'von Daman Upstairs I’m simply stating a fact maan! They kill folks for harming the messenger. I am disappointed with the couple losses but all and all at least they’re still top ranked

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.