Kennesaw State

Owls · 10–4 in 2025–26

Compare Kennesaw State with…
Fan Score
874.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,281
2025–26 season
Positive share
87.4%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
8.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Kennesaw State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 2nd percentile · Team & Front Office: 6th percentile · College Sports: 23rd percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Explicit Language, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Kennesaw State Harm: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Off-Field Storylines: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Team & Front Office: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive87.4%3,743
Neutral6.2%264
Negative5.7%243
Mixed0.7%31

Signature subtags

What Kennesaw State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.8×

Mentioned Band at 2.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.7 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.5×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.8 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.5×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 3Low: +50% · week of Dec 27Aug 29: L 9–10 at Wake ForestLSep 6: L 9–56 at IndianaLSep 13: W 27–13 vs MerrimackWSep 20: W 28–21 vs Arkansas StateWSep 27: W 24–16 vs Middle TennesseeWOct 9: W 35–7 vs Louisiana TechWOct 21: W 45–26 at FIUWOct 28: W 33–20 vs UTEPWNov 8: W 24–21 at New Mexico StateWNov 15: L 26–35 at Jacksonville StateLNov 22: W 41–34 vs Missouri StateWNov 29: W 48–42 (2OT) at LibertyWDec 5: W 19–15 at Jacksonville StateWDec 19: L 6–41 vs Western MichiganLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+82%1242149L 9–10 at Wake Forest
2025-08-30+64%10718139No game
2025-09-06+61%9315128L 9–56 at Indiana
2025-09-13+82%895102W 27–13 vs Merrimack
2025-09-20+95%1413145W 28–21 vs Arkansas State
2025-09-27+90%1014108W 24–16 vs Middle Tennessee
2025-10-04+92%1211131W 35–7 vs Louisiana Tech
2025-10-11+88%65173No game
2025-10-18+88%1614178W 45–26 at FIU
2025-10-25+75%20419247W 33–20 vs UTEP
2025-11-01+90%942102No game
2025-11-08+87%1545171W 24–21 at New Mexico State
2025-11-15+81%16214183L 26–35 at Jacksonville State
2025-11-22+87%21610237W 41–34 vs Missouri State
2025-11-29+88%55021602W 48–42 (2OT) at Liberty; W 19–15 at Jacksonville State
2025-12-06+84%83246938No game
2025-12-13+66%31853404L 6–41 vs Western Michigan
2025-12-20+74%13216157No game
2025-12-27+50%314No game
2026-01-03+100%18018No game
2026-01-10+80%42349No game
2026-01-17+100%16016No game
Fan mood jumped 50 points the week of Jan 3.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 29: L 9–10 at Wake ForestLSep 6: L 9–56 at IndianaLSep 13: W 27–13 vs MerrimackWSep 20: W 28–21 vs Arkansas StateWSep 27: W 24–16 vs Middle TennesseeWOct 9: W 35–7 vs Louisiana TechWOct 21: W 45–26 at FIUWOct 28: W 33–20 vs UTEPWNov 8: W 24–21 at New Mexico StateWNov 15: L 26–35 at Jacksonville StateLNov 22: W 41–34 vs Missouri StateWNov 29: W 48–42 (2OT) at LibertyWDec 5: W 19–15 at Jacksonville StateWDec 19: L 6–41 vs Western MichiganLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2383.2%1.3%149
2025-08-3077%12.9%139
2025-09-0672.7%11.7%128
2025-09-1387.3%4.9%102
2025-09-2097.2%2.1%145
2025-09-2793.5%3.7%108
2025-10-0492.4%0.8%131
2025-10-1189%1.4%73
2025-10-1890.4%2.2%178
2025-10-2582.6%7.7%247
2025-11-0192.2%2%102
2025-11-0890.1%2.9%171
2025-11-1588.5%7.7%183
2025-11-2291.1%4.2%237
2025-11-2991.4%3.5%602
2025-12-0688.7%4.9%938
2025-12-1378.7%13.1%404
2025-12-2084.1%10.2%157
2025-12-2775%25%4
2026-01-03100%0%18
2026-01-1085.7%6.1%49
2026-01-17100%0%16

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm6.8 per 1,000 · 29
Personal Attacks 23Group Hate 5Sexual Content 1
Identity-Based Abuse2.1 per 1,000 · 9
Physical Appearance 4Disability 4Race 1
Explicit Language3.7 per 1,000 · 16
Explicit Acronym 1Explicit Words 15
College Sports11.4 per 1,000 · 49
Band 16Transfer Portal 4Conference Realignment 3Recruiting 19Student Section 5NIL 2
Off-Field Storylines25.9 per 1,000 · 111
Officiating 28Broadcast & Media 76Injuries 5Politics & Activism 2
Sports Betting0.5 per 1,000 · 2
Gambling 2
Team & Front Office69.1 per 1,000 · 296
Coaching 195Front Office 4Stadium Experience 31Opponent Respect 10Crowd & Attendance 48Opponent Hostility 14Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

16 explicit comments3.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words15
  • Explicit Acronym1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 3.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 8.9500 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 27)LLWWWWWWWLWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-236.7L 9–10 at Wake Forest
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-067.8L 9–56 at Indiana
2025-09-130W 27–13 vs Merrimack
2025-09-200W 28–21 vs Arkansas State
2025-09-270W 24–16 vs Middle Tennessee
2025-10-040W 35–7 vs Louisiana Tech
2025-10-110No game
2025-10-180W 45–26 at FIU
2025-10-2516.2W 33–20 vs UTEP
2025-11-019.8No game
2025-11-080W 24–21 at New Mexico State
2025-11-150L 26–35 at Jacksonville State
2025-11-228.4W 41–34 vs Missouri State
2025-11-293.3W 48–42 (2OT) at Liberty; W 19–15 at Jacksonville State
2025-12-066.4No game
2025-12-1329.7L 6–41 vs Western Michigan
2025-12-2038.2No game
2025-12-27500No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-1020.4No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 500 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 27)) against a season average of 8.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks23
  • Group Hate5
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability4
  • Physical Appearance4
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Good luck Owls! Hooty Hoooooo! 🧡🖤

positiveFacebook

Let’s goooooo!! I wish we could start the season next week!!! Love our Owls!!!!

positiveFacebook

STOP CALLING YOURSELF “THE SAW” -everyone-

negativeFacebook

Refs and the home office officials need to be fired!!! Congrats Owls!!!

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.