Oregon State

Beavers · 2–10 in 2025–26

Fan Score
582.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
5,528
2025–26 season
Positive share
58.3%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
31.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Oregon State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 86th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 18th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 19th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Oregon State Harm: 50th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon State Identity-Based Abuse: 19th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon State Explicit Language: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon State College Sports: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon State Off-Field Storylines: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Oregon State Team & Front Office: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive58.3%3,222
Neutral7.4%411
Negative32.5%1,794
Mixed1.8%101

Signature subtags

What Oregon State fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
4.1×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 4.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.8 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
2.4×

Mentioned NIL at 2.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.2 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.6×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 1.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.2 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +78% · week of Jan 17Low: −17% · week of Dec 20Aug 30: L 15–34 vs CaliforniaLSep 6: L 27–36 vs Fresno StateLSep 13: L 14–45 at Texas TechLSep 20: L 7–41 at OregonLSep 26: L 24–27 (OT) vs HoustonLOct 4: L 23–27 at Appalachian StateLOct 11: L 14–39 vs Wake ForestLOct 18: W 45–13 vs LafayetteWNov 1: W 10–7 vs Washington StateWNov 8: L 17–21 vs Sam HoustonLNov 15: L 14–31 at TulsaLNov 29: L 8–32 at Washington StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+51%17947261No game
2025-08-30+18%313211573L 15–34 vs California
2025-09-06+12%271209525L 27–36 vs Fresno State
2025-09-13−5%225252528L 14–45 at Texas Tech
2025-09-20+40%23390360L 7–41 at Oregon; L 24–27 (OT) vs Houston
2025-09-27+23%283171488No game
2025-10-04+2%223212466L 23–27 at Appalachian State
2025-10-11+10%251198515L 14–39 vs Wake Forest
2025-10-18+53%358100484W 45–13 vs Lafayette
2025-10-25+62%28439No game
2025-11-01+23%6313W 10–7 vs Washington State
2025-11-08−7%182144L 17–21 vs Sam Houston
2025-11-15+14%191436L 14–31 at Tulsa
2025-11-22+45%19964301No game
2025-11-29+52%516142725L 8–32 at Washington State
2025-12-06+25%362161No game
2025-12-13+33%10515No game
2025-12-20−17%236No game
2025-12-27+20%325No game
2026-01-03+21%372367No game
2026-01-10+43%417No game
2026-01-17+78%819No game
Mood climbed for 4 straight weeks after the week of Dec 20, gaining 94 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%44%89%Aug 30: L 15–34 vs CaliforniaLSep 6: L 27–36 vs Fresno StateLSep 13: L 14–45 at Texas TechLSep 20: L 7–41 at OregonLSep 26: L 24–27 (OT) vs HoustonLOct 4: L 23–27 at Appalachian StateLOct 11: L 14–39 vs Wake ForestLOct 18: W 45–13 vs LafayetteWNov 1: W 10–7 vs Washington StateWNov 8: L 17–21 vs Sam HoustonLNov 15: L 14–31 at TulsaLNov 29: L 8–32 at Washington StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2368.6%18%261
2025-08-3054.6%36.8%573
2025-09-0651.6%39.8%525
2025-09-1342.6%47.7%528
2025-09-2064.7%25%360
2025-09-2758%35%488
2025-10-0447.9%45.5%466
2025-10-1148.7%38.4%515
2025-10-1874%20.7%484
2025-10-2571.8%10.3%39
2025-11-0146.2%23.1%13
2025-11-0840.9%47.7%44
2025-11-1552.8%38.9%36
2025-11-2266.1%21.3%301
2025-11-2971.2%19.6%725
2025-12-0659%34.4%61
2025-12-1366.7%33.3%15
2025-12-2033.3%50%6
2025-12-2760%40%5
2026-01-0355.2%34.3%67
2026-01-1057.1%14.3%7
2026-01-1788.9%11.1%9

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm26.8 per 1,000 · 148
Group Hate 5Personal Attacks 142Harm Wish 3Sexual Content 2
Identity-Based Abuse4.5 per 1,000 · 25
Disability 3Gender 8Physical Appearance 9Religion 1LGBTQIA+ 1Race 2Age 1
Explicit Language22.6 per 1,000 · 125
Explicit Words 102Explicit Acronym 17Explicit Emoji 8Violent Language 5
College Sports28.6 per 1,000 · 158
Conference Realignment 43Student Section 2Recruiting 37NIL 51Transfer Portal 34Band 6
Off-Field Storylines18.6 per 1,000 · 103
Injuries 12Broadcast & Media 77Politics & Activism 1Officiating 14Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting4.2 per 1,000 · 23
Gambling 17Prop Bet 5Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office162.8 per 1,000 · 900
Coaching 721Front Office 28Crowd & Attendance 47Opponent Respect 21Athletic Department 4Stadium Experience 35Opponent Hostility 59

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

53rd percentile
125 explicit comments22.6 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words102
  • Explicit Acronym17
  • Explicit Emoji8
  • Violent Language5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 22.6 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 48th of 100 nationally, the 53rd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 31.3181.8 per 1,000 · L 17–21 vs Sam HoustonLLLLLLLWWLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2326.8No game
2025-08-3024.4L 15–34 vs California
2025-09-0628.6L 27–36 vs Fresno State
2025-09-1337.9L 14–45 at Texas Tech
2025-09-2013.9L 7–41 at Oregon; L 24–27 (OT) vs Houston
2025-09-2726.6No game
2025-10-0421.5L 23–27 at Appalachian State
2025-10-1152.4L 14–39 vs Wake Forest
2025-10-1826.9W 45–13 vs Lafayette
2025-10-2525.6No game
2025-11-0176.9W 10–7 vs Washington State
2025-11-08181.8L 17–21 vs Sam Houston
2025-11-150L 14–31 at Tulsa
2025-11-2223.3No game
2025-11-2931.7L 8–32 at Washington State
2025-12-0698.4No game
2025-12-13133.3No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-0314.9No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 181.8 per 1,000 comments (L 17–21 vs Sam Houston) against a season average of 31.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks142
  • Group Hate5
  • Harm Wish3
  • Sexual Content2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance9
  • Gender8
  • Disability3
  • Race2
  • Age1
  • LGBTQIA+1
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

It’s game week!!!! Warm up the saw I can almost hear the first down huuuuughhhhhh!!!! Go Beavs!

positiveFacebook

Shepherd will do an outstanding job! Great hire - a man of character!

positiveCoachingFacebook

Beavers defense looks weak

negativeFacebook

Awesome helmet logo but OSU is garbage

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.