Purdue

Boilermakers · 2–10 in 2025–26

Fan Score
538.5
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
6,141
2025–26 season
Positive share
53.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
25.4
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Purdue fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 79th percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 23rd percentile · Sports Betting: 76th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Purdue Harm: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Identity-Based Abuse: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Explicit Language: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue College Sports: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Off-Field Storylines: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Team & Front Office: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive53.9%3,307
Neutral10.7%657
Negative33.9%2,082
Mixed1.5%95

Signature subtags

What Purdue fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.6×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 2.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

9.9 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
2.2×

Mentioned Band at 2.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

2.9 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
2×

Mentioned Front Office at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +72% · week of Sep 27Low: −52% · week of Jan 17Aug 30: W 31–0 vs Ball StateWSep 6: W 34–17 vs S IllinoisWSep 13: L 17–33 vs USCLSep 20: L 30–56 at Notre DameLOct 4: L 27–43 vs IllinoisLOct 11: L 20–27 at MinnesotaLOct 18: L 0–19 at NorthwesternLOct 25: L 24–27 vs RutgersLNov 1: L 16–21 at MichiganLNov 8: L 10–34 vs Ohio StateLNov 15: L 13–49 at WashingtonLNov 28: L 3–56 vs IndianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+46%14047201No game
2025-08-30+69%46663581W 31–0 vs Ball State
2025-09-06+55%31967455W 34–17 vs S Illinois
2025-09-13+31%263116471L 17–33 vs USC
2025-09-20+24%221130387L 30–56 at Notre Dame
2025-09-27+72%11612144No game
2025-10-04+27%12969224L 27–43 vs Illinois
2025-10-11+12%185143355L 20–27 at Minnesota
2025-10-18−10%115145295L 0–19 at Northwestern
2025-10-25−22%118197352L 24–27 vs Rutgers
2025-11-01+33%21297348L 16–21 at Michigan
2025-11-08+11%7357140L 10–34 vs Ohio State
2025-11-15−26%90167299L 13–49 at Washington
2025-11-22−12%248328683L 3–56 vs Indiana
2025-11-29+20%321202602No game
2025-12-06+27%271352No game
2025-12-13−36%3177128No game
2025-12-20−10%6276147No game
2025-12-27+42%9134137No game
2026-01-03+55%441160No game
2026-01-10+36%311253No game
2026-01-17−52%51927No game
Mood climbed for 3 straight weeks after the week of Dec 13, gaining 91 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%40%81%Aug 30: W 31–0 vs Ball StateWSep 6: W 34–17 vs S IllinoisWSep 13: L 17–33 vs USCLSep 20: L 30–56 at Notre DameLOct 4: L 27–43 vs IllinoisLOct 11: L 20–27 at MinnesotaLOct 18: L 0–19 at NorthwesternLOct 25: L 24–27 vs RutgersLNov 1: L 16–21 at MichiganLNov 8: L 10–34 vs Ohio StateLNov 15: L 13–49 at WashingtonLNov 28: L 3–56 vs IndianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2369.7%23.4%201
2025-08-3080.2%10.8%581
2025-09-0670.1%14.7%455
2025-09-1355.8%24.6%471
2025-09-2057.1%33.6%387
2025-09-2780.6%8.3%144
2025-10-0457.6%30.8%224
2025-10-1152.1%40.3%355
2025-10-1839%49.2%295
2025-10-2533.5%56%352
2025-11-0160.9%27.9%348
2025-11-0852.1%40.7%140
2025-11-1530.1%55.9%299
2025-11-2236.3%48%683
2025-11-2953.3%33.6%602
2025-12-0651.9%25%52
2025-12-1324.2%60.2%128
2025-12-2042.2%51.7%147
2025-12-2766.4%24.8%137
2026-01-0373.3%18.3%60
2026-01-1058.5%22.6%53
2026-01-1718.5%70.4%27

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm20.5 per 1,000 · 126
Personal Attacks 122Group Hate 4Sexual Content 2
Identity-Based Abuse4.9 per 1,000 · 30
Age 6Physical Appearance 11Disability 7Gender 5Race 1
Explicit Language13.4 per 1,000 · 82
Explicit Words 52Violent Language 6Explicit Acronym 26Usual Suspects 2
College Sports25.4 per 1,000 · 156
Transfer Portal 61Recruiting 30NIL 42Band 18Conference Realignment 10Student Section 7
Off-Field Storylines29 per 1,000 · 178
Broadcast & Media 112Injuries 31Officiating 33Politics & Activism 2Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting4.1 per 1,000 · 25
Gambling 18Prop Bet 6Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office142.5 per 1,000 · 875
Coaching 457Crowd & Attendance 82Opponent Respect 57Opponent Hostility 210Stadium Experience 47Front Office 42Athletic Department 11

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

36th percentile
82 explicit comments13.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words52
  • Explicit Acronym26
  • Violent Language6
  • Usual Suspects2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 13.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 65th of 100 nationally, the 36th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 25.4444.4 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWLLLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2354.7No game
2025-08-3015.5W 31–0 vs Ball State
2025-09-0624.2W 34–17 vs S Illinois
2025-09-1319.1L 17–33 vs USC
2025-09-2025.8L 30–56 at Notre Dame
2025-09-270No game
2025-10-048.9L 27–43 vs Illinois
2025-10-1122.5L 20–27 at Minnesota
2025-10-1813.6L 0–19 at Northwestern
2025-10-2525.6L 24–27 vs Rutgers
2025-11-0111.5L 16–21 at Michigan
2025-11-0814.3L 10–34 vs Ohio State
2025-11-1533.4L 13–49 at Washington
2025-11-2233.7L 3–56 vs Indiana
2025-11-2923.3No game
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-1339.1No game
2025-12-2061.2No game
2025-12-2729.2No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-17444.4No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 444.4 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 25.4 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks122
  • Group Hate4
  • Sexual Content2
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance11
  • Disability7
  • Age6
  • Gender5
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

GO. GO. PURDUE. YOU. GUYS. CAN. DO. IT. !!!

positiveFacebook

“For no document from human hands can make these humans any less our brothers.” - MLK Jr.

positiveFacebook

Coach just cancel the season , stop playing football at Purdue and move on. Cash savings , remove Ross-Ade more parking etc.

negativeFacebook

Love my Boilers, but this season, after last season, is wearing on me, but I’m not going anywhere.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.