Air Force

Falcons · 4–8 in 2025–26

Fan Score
612.1
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
2,980
2025–26 season
Positive share
61.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
11.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Air Force fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Harm: 7th percentile · Team & Front Office: 81st percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 28th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Explicit Language, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Air Force Harm: 7th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Air Force Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Air Force Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Air Force College Sports: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Air Force Off-Field Storylines: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Air Force Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Air Force Team & Front Office: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive61.2%1,824
Neutral8.3%246
Negative28.4%845
Mixed2.2%65

Signature subtags

What Air Force fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.3×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8.7 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.5×

Mentioned Opponent Hostility at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

41.6 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.3×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

111.4 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +81% · W 24–21 vs WyomingLow: −14% · week of Dec 20Aug 30: W 49–13 vs BucknellWSep 13: L 30–49 at Utah StateLSep 20: L 37–49 vs Boise StateLSep 27: L 35–44 vs HawaiiLOct 4: L 31–34 at NavyLOct 11: L 48–51 at UNLVLOct 18: W 24–21 vs WyomingWNov 1: L 17–20 vs ArmyLNov 8: W 26–16 at San Jose StateWNov 15: L 16–26 at UConnLNov 22: L 3–20 vs New MexicoLNov 28: W 42–21 at Colorado StateWAug 23Dec 20
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+78%927109No game
2025-08-30+63%19227262W 49–13 vs Bucknell
2025-09-06+52%591290No game
2025-09-13+58%12628168L 30–49 at Utah State
2025-09-20+52%10528148L 37–49 vs Boise State
2025-09-27+24%15992278L 35–44 vs Hawaii
2025-10-04+20%14593260L 31–34 at Navy
2025-10-11+13%134100261L 48–51 at UNLV
2025-10-18+81%15110174W 24–21 vs Wyoming
2025-10-25+51%451265No game
2025-11-01−14%101137266L 17–20 vs Army
2025-11-08+70%17227208W 26–16 at San Jose State
2025-11-15+0%6363136L 16–26 at UConn
2025-11-22+2%156149345L 3–20 vs New Mexico; W 42–21 at Colorado State
2025-11-29+26%8848156No game
2025-12-06+67%10212No game
2025-12-13+49%23635No game
2025-12-20−14%347No game
Fan mood jumped 83 points the week they beat San Jose State by 10.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%43%87%Aug 30: W 49–13 vs BucknellWSep 13: L 30–49 at Utah StateLSep 20: L 37–49 vs Boise StateLSep 27: L 35–44 vs HawaiiLOct 4: L 31–34 at NavyLOct 11: L 48–51 at UNLVLOct 18: W 24–21 vs WyomingWNov 1: L 17–20 vs ArmyLNov 8: W 26–16 at San Jose StateWNov 15: L 16–26 at UConnLNov 22: L 3–20 vs New MexicoLNov 28: W 42–21 at Colorado StateWAug 23Dec 20
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2384.4%6.4%109
2025-08-3073.3%10.3%262
2025-09-0665.6%13.3%90
2025-09-1375%16.7%168
2025-09-2070.9%18.9%148
2025-09-2757.2%33.1%278
2025-10-0455.8%35.8%260
2025-10-1151.3%38.3%261
2025-10-1886.8%5.7%174
2025-10-2569.2%18.5%65
2025-11-0138%51.5%266
2025-11-0882.7%13%208
2025-11-1546.3%46.3%136
2025-11-2245.2%43.2%345
2025-11-2956.4%30.8%156
2025-12-0683.3%16.7%12
2025-12-1365.7%17.1%35
2025-12-2042.9%57.1%7

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm9.1 per 1,000 · 27
Personal Attacks 26Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse2 per 1,000 · 6
Age 3LGBTQIA+ 1Disability 1Physical Appearance 1
Explicit Language3.7 per 1,000 · 11
Explicit Acronym 6Explicit Emoji 2Explicit Words 2Violent Language 1
College Sports18.8 per 1,000 · 56
Transfer Portal 26Recruiting 16NIL 14Conference Realignment 8Band 1
Off-Field Storylines21.8 per 1,000 · 65
Broadcast & Media 39Officiating 9Injuries 15Player Conduct 1Politics & Activism 1
Sports Betting3.7 per 1,000 · 11
Gambling 11
Team & Front Office169.5 per 1,000 · 505
Coaching 332Opponent Hostility 124Crowd & Attendance 11Opponent Respect 27Stadium Experience 16Front Office 4

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

11 explicit comments3.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym6
  • Explicit Emoji2
  • Explicit Words2
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 3.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 11.1142.9 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 20)WLLLLLWLWLLW2025-08-232025-12-20
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-300W 49–13 vs Bucknell
2025-09-0611.1No game
2025-09-1311.9L 30–49 at Utah State
2025-09-206.8L 37–49 vs Boise State
2025-09-2736L 35–44 vs Hawaii
2025-10-0430.8L 31–34 at Navy
2025-10-110L 48–51 at UNLV
2025-10-180W 24–21 vs Wyoming
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-0115L 17–20 vs Army
2025-11-084.8W 26–16 at San Jose State
2025-11-150L 16–26 at UConn
2025-11-222.9L 3–20 vs New Mexico; W 42–21 at Colorado State
2025-11-2925.6No game
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-20142.9No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 142.9 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 20)) against a season average of 11.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks26
  • Harm Wish1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age3
  • Disability1
  • LGBTQIA+1
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Hopefully more affordable items.

positiveFacebook

Going to be an epic season. 🙌🏈🙌

positiveFacebook

Where is the gameday schedule? Air Force Football

negativeFacebook

Worst. Tackling. Ever. Hang in there, guys!

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.